That score would give HD 4850 ~1.86x the texture power of HD 3870, when the theoretical jump w/ 32 TMUs @ 625MHz is 1.61x. The jump with 40 TMUs @ 625MHz would be 2.01x, which seems likely given the 1.86x increase in texture fillrate. HD 4850 might have trouble getting all of its theoretical fillrate since it is likely bandwidth limited.
That score would give HD 4850 ~1.86x the texture power of HD 3870, when the theoretical jump w/ 32 TMUs @ 625MHz is 1.61x. The jump with 40 TMUs @ 625MHz would be 2.01x, which seems likely given the 1.86x increase in texture fillrate. HD 4850 might have trouble getting all of its theoretical fillrate since it is likely bandwidth limited.
I concur, actually. But even on the safe side, 32 TMUs would be great already. Memory is SERIOUSLY limiting the 4850's performance from my standpoint.
8800GTX stock - 33fps AVG with the same settings. I'm not sure, i think is too slow, because at 1680* Very High i get 20fps avg@680/160/1080
That`s normal. Crysis has an uber-ness limiter that halves the frame rate whenever it gets close to 100. Apparently, the story goes that Crysis brings out a new patch whenever computers start getting above 100fps on any settings in the game, to preserve it`s uberness and to drive fanboys crazy over its low unoptimizied framerates for many years to come
Perkam
__________________ Chicken....will be TASTY...in 2010
only that thse patches are called expansion-packs, that cut frames in half and offer only minimalistic graphical improvements (and crytek gets more money)
__________________
system:
Phenom II 920 3.5Ghz @ 1.4v, benchstable @ over 3,6Ghz (didnt test higher)
xigmatek achilles
sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 820 1020
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
8gb a-data 4-4-4-12 800
x-fi xtrememusic
rip 2x 160gb maxtor(now that adds up to 4...)
320gb/250gb/500gb samsung
i will test Crysis at 800x600 on HIGH tonight on my 8800gt and see what happens but i have a feeling it will be similar to that score. if so im not to impressed. hopefully drivers will fix things.
__________________
Does your pc just idle when at work surfing the web or any time you aren't gaming? Give it a purpose and crunch for the XS WCG team. Meet great people and kick cancer and aids right where it hurts!!!!! We have everything to gain and nothing to loose!!!!!
Rig1:
-Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4Ghz @ 3.9ghz On Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme
-Asus P5Q Deluxe
-4GB G. Skill DDR2 800mhz @1040mhz
-Sapphire ATI 5870 1GB @890/1285 for now
-Creative XFI Titanium
-Logitech G15 (old) and G5
-Antec 900 and OCZ GameXStream 700watt
-Western Digital Caviar SE16 750GB (WD7500AAKS) 7,200rpm
-Windows 7 RC 64Bit
If those results aren't a fake nvidia will have serious problems with the price/performance relation. Only the high-end products wouldn't produce enough sales and the cards of ati will be the best choice in their price gap...
they're an opposite version of the gtx vs 3870x2 graphs from nvidia
soooo similar in how they use scale and compare previous gen
you really think AMD just copied a leaked nvidia chart?
I don't think so. The nvidia graphics were with about 100 and more percentage difference between their and the ati product, but these look more realistic. I've said they can be fake, but there is still hope in every fanATIc.
P.S. Maybe you're right about the total fake They just have pasted a 4870 pic in the other slide, in order to hide the spot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isaac MM
Will there be any difference in performance between a 4870 in CrossFire and a 4870x2?
Yes there should be, because of the shared memory that 4870X2 have to use.
I don't think so. The nvidia graphics were with about 100 and more percentage difference between their and the ati product, but these look more realistic. I've said they can be fake, but there is still hope in every fanATIc.
![[XC] hipno650's Avatar](image.php?u=26623&dateline=1197750135)
They just have pasted a 4870 pic in the other slide, in order to hide the spot.
Linear Mode
