First off, this is just a quick test, far from perfect, but I just thought it would be interesting to share.
I have been using the Xigmatek cooler for a while now with a Q6600 and have been pleasantly surprised at the results. This weekend I had a chance to compare it with my Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme. I have had this TRUE for months and it is lapped.
I tested on an open bench because it just takes too much time switching everything around using a case. Ambient temps were rather cool, 65-68f. I did this in my garage and I live in Seattle.
The set-up: P5K Premium (0504 Bios), Q6600 (not lapped)@ 3.6ghz, 1.425vcore, loadline calibration enabled, 2 x 1GB Gskill PC8500. Both coolers were tested with the stock Xigamtek fan and a Panaflo M1A that I normally run with the TRUE. Screenshot were taken after about 1 hour of blend in Prime 95. I know small fft's will produce more heat, but just trying to show more of a real world comparison. Also, since the temps tend to fluctuate some, I tried to watch and take the screenshot at the highest temp. Now on to the results.
Xigmatek, stock fan:
TRUE with stock Xigmatek fan:
Xigmatek with Panaflo M1A:
TRUE with Panaflo M1A:
As you can see from my results the Xigmatek S1283 damn near matches the TRUE's performance. At about half the cost, this has to be the best bang for your buck cooler. With the stock fan, it is pretty quiet, and didn't really gain a lot with the more powerful fan. That is where the TRUE really shines. On my last test with the Panaflo fan, my ambient jumped up to 72f. (The wife came home and parked her hot car in the garage) Even with the higher ambient, temps dropped significantly over the Xigmatek fan.
So what does this all prove? Nothing except that I some extra time this weekend Just thought I would share.
Bookmarks