 |
|
01-04-2008, 05:24 AM
|
#1
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,694
|
My performance simulation of GeForce 9800GX2
2x GeForce GTS-512, Two mobos with nForce 780i SLI - my today test rig.
I am testing two GeForce 8800 GTS-512 now, during this test i can to test "supposed" future performance of GeForce 9800GX2 ... i think.
GeForce 9800GX2 is two 8800-512 PCB together, but clocks of GPU a MEMs will be lowest, because heat. I underclock GPU/MEM from 650/1940 to 550/1800 in SLI and now i am testing games with. You can see results in first game ...
Complete review in Czech language ...
http://www.pctuning.cz/index.php?opt...9959&Itemid=44
Direct link to Tests - graph dont need a translation ...
http://www.pctuning.cz/index.php?opt...1&limitstart=5
__________________
Core i7 Ci7 i920 D0, W3540, Ci9 Extreme, Ci5 670 ...
Gigabyte EX58-UD5, Asus Rampage 2 Extreme, eVGA 2x X58 Classified
Nvidia 3x GTX 285 SLi, 5x GTX 260, 2x GTX 295, 2x HD5870
Thermaltake 1000W, Corsair HX 1000W
Watercooled by Swiftech (NB, SB, GPUs) + Apogee GTX + Two Laing D5 pumps + 2x Rads + Waterchiller
Lian Li Armosuit PC-P80 Black case
Last edited by OBR; 01-08-2008 at 06:48 AM.
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 05:33 AM
|
#2
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Snowdonia
Posts: 141
|
Dont get it,you post an unreal/estimated benchmark?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 05:39 AM
|
#3
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cairo
Posts: 2,280
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatal Error
Dont get it,you post an unreal/estimated benchmark?
|
He is just running underclocked 8800GTS 512MB SLI
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 05:40 AM
|
#4
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kemo
He is just running underclocked 8800GTS 512MB SLI
|
Yes, it is measured score of underclocked GTS-512 SLI ...
__________________
Core i7 Ci7 i920 D0, W3540, Ci9 Extreme, Ci5 670 ...
Gigabyte EX58-UD5, Asus Rampage 2 Extreme, eVGA 2x X58 Classified
Nvidia 3x GTX 285 SLi, 5x GTX 260, 2x GTX 295, 2x HD5870
Thermaltake 1000W, Corsair HX 1000W
Watercooled by Swiftech (NB, SB, GPUs) + Apogee GTX + Two Laing D5 pumps + 2x Rads + Waterchiller
Lian Li Armosuit PC-P80 Black case
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 05:44 AM
|
#5
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 279
|
gx2 is supposed to be 30% faster than the ultra
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 06:00 AM
|
#6
|
|
The Doctor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,601
|
Indeed the GX2 is "rumored" to be 30% faster then the Ultra.
But from what your "simulations" say, Its about -30%
So Maybe they have something up their sleeve, Maybe its the G90 based and not G92.
Who knows. Why try to take guesses now. We can't do that till we have the card in hand.
__________________
Nvidia Forceware 195.39 Recommended
Nvidia Forceware 191.07 WHQL Released
Nvidia Forceware 195.55 Beta Released
Teacher says "Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference." In other words it's like a flesh eating virus and You should not use it for a reliable source.
My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
Once this baby hits 88 GigaFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....
GigaFLOPs Record - 59.xxx using 2.4Gb of memory.
David Tennant will be missed as The Doctor
Current OS Systems: Windows XP 64bit Build 3959, Windows 7 64bit Ultimate Signature Edition, Ubuntu 9.10
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 06:07 AM
|
#7
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: May 2006
Location: De. Stuttgart
Posts: 1,144
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fcry64
gx2 is supposed to be 30% faster than the ultra
|
 K10 was supposed to be 40% faster than conroe
__________________
De oppresso liber
Nous Defions
Nothing follows
cpu PXA310 memmory 197.36mb
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 06:10 AM
|
#8
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,616
|
Simulations based on speculation based on rumors posted as news, this is getting better and better 
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 06:26 AM
|
#9
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,694
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warboy
Indeed the GX2 is "rumored" to be 30% faster then the Ultra.
But from what your "simulations" say, Its about -30%
So Maybe they have something up their sleeve, Maybe its the G90 based and not G92.
Who knows. Why try to take guesses now. We can't do that till we have the card in hand.
|
Score is lower only in low resolution ... look at 1920x1200 ... and Crysis game!
__________________
Core i7 Ci7 i920 D0, W3540, Ci9 Extreme, Ci5 670 ...
Gigabyte EX58-UD5, Asus Rampage 2 Extreme, eVGA 2x X58 Classified
Nvidia 3x GTX 285 SLi, 5x GTX 260, 2x GTX 295, 2x HD5870
Thermaltake 1000W, Corsair HX 1000W
Watercooled by Swiftech (NB, SB, GPUs) + Apogee GTX + Two Laing D5 pumps + 2x Rads + Waterchiller
Lian Li Armosuit PC-P80 Black case
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 06:40 AM
|
#10
|
|
The Doctor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,601
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OBR
Score is lower only in low resolution ... look at 1920x1200 ... and Crysis game!
|
uhhh? so?
I'm pretty sure Nvidia would release a 30% overall then 30% in select apps / settings.
__________________
Nvidia Forceware 195.39 Recommended
Nvidia Forceware 191.07 WHQL Released
Nvidia Forceware 195.55 Beta Released
Teacher says "Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference." In other words it's like a flesh eating virus and You should not use it for a reliable source.
My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
Once this baby hits 88 GigaFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....
GigaFLOPs Record - 59.xxx using 2.4Gb of memory.
David Tennant will be missed as The Doctor
Current OS Systems: Windows XP 64bit Build 3959, Windows 7 64bit Ultimate Signature Edition, Ubuntu 9.10
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 07:01 AM
|
#11
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Stalingrad, USSR
Posts: 448
|
warboy what are you talking about
g80 640mb gts beats g92 512mb gt on very high resolutions with aa/af
but the g92 gt STOMPS the g80 640mb on lower resolutions.
it has to do with vram
__________________
cm690 w/ 7 yate loons
q6600 - l737b046 @ 8*400 w/ TRUE (vid 1.2125, will push later when needed)
eVGA 8800gts 640 MB @ 626/980 with stock cooling 100% fan
p35-ds3r with stock cooling
mushkin ddr2 800 2x2gb @ 800 5-4-4-12
seagate 7200.10 280gb + 7200.7 80gb
corsair hx520W
westinghouse 22" widescreen monitor
syncmaster 1100p
ath-a900 headphones w/x-fi xtrememusic
mx518 with xtrac ripper xl mousepad, and an n52 with some generic bad keyboard, i need something new 
logitech usb mic
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 07:38 AM
|
#12
|
|
Xtreme X.I.P.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 臺北 (Taipei)
Posts: 31,271
|
you forgot one thing, the 9800gx2 will have 16lanes for 2 cards, so each gpu will have 8 lanes only, so itll be even slower than that 
__________________
.
Nvidia: Tesla C2050 and C2070 products (GT300) will retail for $2,499 and $3,999
JHH (Nvidia) sep 2009: The best way to always be the number1 is to have no backup plan  link
JHH (Nvidia) nov 2009: Tolerance for failure is important, it puts our employees in a position where they are willing to try new ideas  link
Solus Corvus - maybe things would get better if people addressed the content of each others posts instead of trying to discredit each other with insults and poisoning the well. Attack the argument not the person.
Hail Voltage! The Solution to AND Source of all our Hardware Problems
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 07:51 AM
|
#13
|
|
Phazers on Stun
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,352
|
So a little off center but Which 780i board do you like?
the
EVGA - Very hard to find
XFX - looks exactly like Evga and pops up every now and then
ASUS- is always available?
which board do would you get to run your dual 8800 GTS 512
thanks
__________________
HEAT
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 07:54 AM
|
#14
|
|
The Doctor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,601
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lev
warboy what are you talking about
g80 640mb gts beats g92 512mb gt on very high resolutions with aa/af
but the g92 gt STOMPS the g80 640mb on lower resolutions.
it has to do with vram
|
You clearly do not understand. That wasn't the point of topic.
We're talking about pure performance. I never said anything about the 8800GTS G80 based cards.
__________________
Nvidia Forceware 195.39 Recommended
Nvidia Forceware 191.07 WHQL Released
Nvidia Forceware 195.55 Beta Released
Teacher says "Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference." In other words it's like a flesh eating virus and You should not use it for a reliable source.
My Rig can do EpicFLOPs, Can yours?
Once this baby hits 88 GigaFLOPs, You're going to see some serious $@#%....
GigaFLOPs Record - 59.xxx using 2.4Gb of memory.
David Tennant will be missed as The Doctor
Current OS Systems: Windows XP 64bit Build 3959, Windows 7 64bit Ultimate Signature Edition, Ubuntu 9.10
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 07:54 AM
|
#15
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Montana, USA
Posts: 409
|
While it is highly speculative, I like the thought process here.
__________________
C2Q6600 g0@ 3520Mhz
440x8 1.375v Orthos stable
nvidia 680i reference board
Patriot 2x2GB 6400 @440mhz 5-4-4-12
evga GTX 260 Core216 720/1440/2376
Custom watercooling
150Gb Raptor
Corsair TX850
64bit Vista Ultimate
47" 1080p LCD
Last edited by Movieman; 01-04-2008 at 10:06 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 08:13 AM
|
#16
|
|
Xtreme Mentor
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Spain, EU
Posts: 2,529
|
8800GTS 512 SLI slower than 8800GT SLI? 
__________________
Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 08:16 AM
|
#17
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 261
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fcry64
gx2 is supposed to be 30% faster than the ultra
|
Sli was also supposed to be almost double the performance and look where we are know.I think hardware is way ahead of software i will all depend on the drivers.
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 09:00 AM
|
#18
|
|
Xtreme Guru
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,372
|
Interesting prediction, lets see what turns up in the wash.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 09:01 AM
|
#19
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,750
|
lol, i find it somehow amusing that you put "geforce 9800gx2"-tag in these graphs. i mean, someone who just sees these pics will be like "OMFG, they benched a 9800gx2 and it sux ass!"...
could very well be mixed up.
__________________
1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 @690/1093 MHz / WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 Surround Speaker // SysProfile
2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Hitachi Deskstar 40GB, 2x Seagate Medalist 10GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W
Server: MSI K7T266 Pro2-R / AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @~1666 MHz (12,5x133,3) / 2x256 MB Kingston PC2300, 2.0-3-3-6 / PixelView GeForce FX 5900XT / WD Caviar 160GB + Seagate 80GB
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 09:10 AM
|
#20
|
|
Xtreme Mentor
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 3,422
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warboy
Indeed the GX2 is "rumored" to be 30% faster then the Ultra.
But from what your "simulations" say, Its about -30%
.
|
?????
all testes the 9800GX2 its faster than ULTRA , the only test i see where Ultra its faster its in Bioshock @ 1280x1024
Bioshock @ 1280x1024
Ultra = 134 FPS
8900GX2 = 124 Fps
-7%
Bioshock @ 1600x1200
Ultra = 92 Fps
9800GX2 = 102 Fps
+ 11%
Bioshock @ 1920x1200
Ultra = 86 Fps
8900GX2 = 96 Fps
+12%
Crysis @ 1920x1200
Ultra = 26 Fps
8900GX2 = 37 Fps
+ 42%
regards
Last edited by mascaras; 01-04-2008 at 09:17 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 10:54 AM
|
#21
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lithuania,Klaipeda
Posts: 36
|
Thanks for this "9800GX2" tests :]
40fps in Crysis @1920x1200.Uh..not bad I think But AF and AA is 0 :{
w/e,Crysis graphics is beastly and the best now with its CryEngine2.
__________________
E6300@3.3GHz|9700LED|965P-DS3(rev.2.0)|Corsair 2GB CL5|X1950PRO 256mb@vf900cu-led|Inter-Tech 420w@ZALMAN F3|WD 250GB|LCD LG Flatron 19"|Logitech G15v2|Razer DeathAdder|Steelpad 4D|Icemat Siberia+usb
Sorry for bad english :|
 
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 11:02 AM
|
#22
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montenegro
Posts: 291
|
Nvidia is losing its edge. Hopefully ATI's dual gpu solution is much better in scailing. I think it will be.
__________________
Internet will save the World.
Foxconn MARS
E8400 Wolfdale @ 4Ghz@1.4225v
Team Xtreem 2GB 4-4-4-10 @ 9x450mhz 1:1
Foxconn 8800GTX OC 630/2000
CORSAIR 620HX
2x 320Gig Seagate Perps in Raid 0 & 80Gig WD Back-Up
Theramlright Extreme 120
BenQ FP241W Black 24" 6ms
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 11:11 AM
|
#23
|
|
Xtreme Guru
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,372
|
Wait, isn't the 9800 GTX nothing more then a 8800 GTX die shrink?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 11:24 AM
|
#24
|
|
XIP
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 5,311
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBull78
Nvidia is losing its edge. Hopefully ATI's dual gpu solution is much better in scailing. I think it will be.
|
Remember, this was just a simulation, not real results. 
|
|
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 11:24 AM
|
#25
|
|
Xtreme X.I.P.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 臺北 (Taipei)
Posts: 31,271
|
9800gtx is a 8800gts g92 but with higher clocks afaik
__________________
.
Nvidia: Tesla C2050 and C2070 products (GT300) will retail for $2,499 and $3,999
JHH (Nvidia) sep 2009: The best way to always be the number1 is to have no backup plan link
JHH (Nvidia) nov 2009: Tolerance for failure is important, it puts our employees in a position where they are willing to try new ideas link
Solus Corvus - maybe things would get better if people addressed the content of each others posts instead of trying to discredit each other with insults and poisoning the well. Attack the argument not the person.
Hail Voltage! The Solution to AND Source of all our Hardware Problems
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
 Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:36 AM.
|
