We're having a little argument.
Which rad is better, the MCR320 or the GTS360? Or maybe anything else for 60$ +-?
thanks,
Zzzz
We're having a little argument.
Which rad is better, the MCR320 or the GTS360? Or maybe anything else for 60$ +-?
thanks,
Zzzz
Rig: Intel Pentium E 2140 | Gigabyte 965P-S3 | G.Skill 2GBNT | Sapphire HD2600 XT | Fsp 350-60Gln
Ppc: Intel XScale 255Mhz | 64Mb Ram | 64Mb Flashdrive | 320x240 QVga | hp1915 | 1Gb Sandisk Storage Card
Nas: Intel Pentium 3 477Mhz | Epox | 384 Patriot SDRam | nVidia Geforce tnt2 | Boxter 500W
Else: Viewsonic VG930m | Microsoft Optical | D-Link 524
I think, therefore I am
-Renι Descartes
Sorry for my bad english =D
MCR320, WHY YOU ASK? Cause im using one!
Nothing anymore
MCR, no questions asked
Lian Li PC-75B Corsair Professional Series 850w
2x Intel Xeon E5420 @ 3.0GHz (400x7.5) Intel D5400XS Skulltrail
8GB (4x2GB) A-Data DDR2-800 FB-DIMM ECC (1:1 @ 400MHz)
MSI Radeon HD4870 1GB Creative X-Fi Titanium HD
2x WD VelociRaptor 150GB (RAID 0) + 2x WD Caviar Black 500GB
2x EK Supreme HF CPU EK S-MAX NB EK VGA Supreme GPU Blastflow Tidal SB
Thermochill PA120.3 Swiftech MCRes-Micro Laing D5 w/ Bitspower Top
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Heatware http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=34593
From Radical_53:s radiator test:
At 600rpm:
Thermochill PA120.3 - 7k
Watercool HTSF - 8k
Watercool HTSF3-x - 8.4k
Cooltek Maxistream / Swiftech MCR - 8.4k
Black Ice GT - 9.2k
Black Ice Extreme - 11k
Alphacool NexXxos Pro - 11.2k
Black Ice GT X-Flow - 12.1k
Black Ice Extreme X-Flow - 12.3k
Alphacool NexXxos Extreme - 14k
At 900rpm:
ThermoChill - 6.2k
Cooltek - 6.9k
BIGT - 7.2k
WC HTSF - 7.3k
BIGT-XFlow - 7.3k
WC HTSF3-x - 7.4k
NexXxos Pro - 7.5k
BIX - 8.5k
NexXxos Extreme - 8.5k
BIX-XFlow - 9.5k
At 1200rpm:
ThermoChill - 4.2k
Cooltek - 5.6k
BIGT - 5.7k
BIGT-XFlow - 5.9k
BIX - 5.9k
NexXxos Pro - 6.1k
NexXxos Extreme - 6.1k
HTF3-x - 6.3k
HTSF - 6.3k
BIX-XFlow - 6.6k
As you can see MCR beats GTS but the difference gets smaller at higher RPMs so if you plan on using strong fans GTS might be better. I'd go with the MCR though because I prioritize performance at low RPMs.
GTS has higher restriction i think... MCR is cheaper, why not?
Lenovo Thinkpad X220 - Core i5 2410m, 4gb
waiting on 28nm video cards...
Radical's numbers showed something like a 1% difference in pressure drop between the rads, with the GTS coming out on the top. It's not a noticable difference, however, and the MCR-2/320 radiators are very widely available and inexpensive.
Unfortunately, Radical's data is a bit, well, dated. A link to a more up-to-date roundup, preferably including the Hardware Labs GTX and some 50-100 CFM fans, would be eternally appreciated.
Hmmm... Thats strange, lots of the tables I've seen show bigger differences in restriction than just 1%. Anyways GTS is pretty expensive. Its small yes, but if you want small go BIP Xflow lol its even smaller.
Lenovo Thinkpad X220 - Core i5 2410m, 4gb
waiting on 28nm video cards...
The MCR is a great rad. And not to expensive either.
NoPeace - out
See www.thermal-management-testing.com - test data there for all brands also contains MCR220 as baseline test, and all show the MCR220 to beat the BI GTS240... therefore due to scalability of results when it comes to radiator testing, MCR320 also beats GTS360.
Bookmarks