MMM
Page 1 of 6 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 140

Thread: ATI`s R600 News Thread

  1. #1
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,475

    ATI`s R600 News Thread

    R600, codename: Pele
    True 512-bit memoryinterface (Nvidia G80 = 384-bit)
    1024 MB GDDR4 mem 2,5GHz effective, bandwidth 160GB/s (G80 = 86GB/s)
    80nm
    Free 4xAA
    Expected launch time: 1Q 2007

    Original source
    Last edited by Cooper; 10-12-2006 at 01:51 PM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,250
    if its true its a beast.
    4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11 (one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,087
    Free 4xAA is tastety.
    ________
    Toyota Rz Engine
    Last edited by clayton; 03-10-2011 at 06:22 AM.

  4. #4
    SLC
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    2,795
    hmm looks a little too good, can it really be ~50% fasterer than G80?

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    7,825
    If it's as fast as the specs look, nvidia is BEYOND screwed...
    Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
    3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,533
    Dam thats impressive. If true I guess I will have to buy an AMD product.

    If this is true . Would SLI G80 be competitive to 1 R600? I read the G80 info and its 125 shaders. But keep in mind that 64 R600 unified shaders = is 192 shaders.

    If this is true Its going to be a massive performer. How much $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
    Last edited by Turtle 1; 10-12-2006 at 02:12 PM.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    585
    This card will be a monster folding beast and a hell of a good video card

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    756
    Quote Originally Posted by afireinside
    If it's as fast as the specs look, nvidia is BEYOND screwed...
    no, they are SUPER screwed lmao!!!
    if the nvidia g80 has 700+ transistors, ur talking about a heat output of over w 350 watts!!!
    jeez that means it will need to take in more than 450watts a card...
    new psus wont work that well
    My Rig:
    i7 3770k
    Sabertooth Z77
    MSI GTX680 reference
    2x8gb Mushkin Redline 8-8-8-18 @1600
    Corsair Neutron 256gb
    2x Toshiba 7200rpm 3TB(Raid 0)
    Corsair 600T White
    Corsair HX750
    Asus PCE-AC66
    Hanns-G 27"

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,933
    Quote Originally Posted by Turtle 1
    Dam thats impressive. If true I guess I will have to buy an AMD product.

    If this is true . Would SLI G80 be competitive to 1 R600? I read the G80 info and its 125 shaders. But keep in mind that 64 R600 unified shaders = is 192 shaders.

    If this is true Its going to be a massive performer.
    Holy crap! 192 shaders Oo!

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    756
    Quote Originally Posted by fhpchris
    Holy crap! 192 shaders Oo!
    but its unified remember that, so it can have 16 pipes and 176 pixel shaders, or 176 pipes and 16 shaders
    My Rig:
    i7 3770k
    Sabertooth Z77
    MSI GTX680 reference
    2x8gb Mushkin Redline 8-8-8-18 @1600
    Corsair Neutron 256gb
    2x Toshiba 7200rpm 3TB(Raid 0)
    Corsair 600T White
    Corsair HX750
    Asus PCE-AC66
    Hanns-G 27"

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    WTF that can't be right, GDDR4 at 2.5 GHz??
    With so much bandwidth I wonder if its even necessary to have 1024 Mb, that will just be pushing the price sky high, 512Mb would more that beat Nvidias 7xxMb in performance anyway.
    On a sidenote, if this is true, yes Nvidia is in some dookie

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    756
    Quote Originally Posted by Dimitriman
    WTF that can't be right, GDDR4 at 2.5 GHz??
    With so much bandwidth I wonder if its even necessary to have 1024 Mb, that will just be pushing the price sky high, 512Mb would more that beat Nvidias 7xxMb in performance anyway.
    On a sidenote, if this is true, yes Nvidia is in some dookie
    ???
    gddr4 is tested to be able to go to 3ghz (1.5ghz ddr)
    1225mhz is nothing!!!
    My Rig:
    i7 3770k
    Sabertooth Z77
    MSI GTX680 reference
    2x8gb Mushkin Redline 8-8-8-18 @1600
    Corsair Neutron 256gb
    2x Toshiba 7200rpm 3TB(Raid 0)
    Corsair 600T White
    Corsair HX750
    Asus PCE-AC66
    Hanns-G 27"

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by rpg711
    ???
    gddr4 is tested to be able to go to 3ghz (1.5ghz ddr)
    1225mhz is nothing!!!
    I see, sounds nice but I still think 1024 is just too expensive and unnecessary since it will perform so fast anyway.

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    703
    Quote Originally Posted by rpg711
    ???
    gddr4 is tested to be able to go to 3ghz (1.5ghz ddr)
    1225mhz is nothing!!!
    Agreed especially since x1950s already have 1Ghz GDDR4.
    A wiseman once said, "If Bible proves the existence of God, then comic books prove the existence of Superheros."

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    They talk about free 4xAA but apparently they don't take the eDRAM approach, so it isn't necessarily free 4xAA but rather so much ram so fast that 4xAA can be considered free, from what I understood

  16. #16
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Upstate, NY
    Posts
    5,425
    Quote Originally Posted by flopper
    if its true its a beast.
    Doesn't look to good for nVidia now does it

    As it stands at the moment, from looking at specs, nVidia has no chance. There are SO many variables though, like if ATi has enough stock or not, and weather or not they can keep up with supply and demand. They should be able to though, given the fact that AMD owns them now and should be able to provide the neceserry materials, and funds to make things happen quickly. It also depends on how much heat this will put out, power consumption, real-world benching, drivers, etc.
    Last edited by NickS; 10-12-2006 at 02:29 PM.
    Core i3-550 Clarkdale @ 4.2GHz, 1.36v (Corsair A50 HS/F) LinX Stable
    MSI H55-GD65 Motherboard
    G.Skill 4GBRL DDR3-1600 @ 1755, CL9, 1.55v
    Sapphire Radeon 5750 1GB
    Samsung F4 320GB - WD Green 1TB
    Xigmatek Utgard Case - Corsair VX550

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Herbert's House in Family Guy
    Posts
    2,381
    u know i might jsut wait for this, as my GeForce 7800GTX SLI is not doing too bad even for the graphic intense games like Oblivion

    but ATI + intel dont really have any future in multi GPU as RD600 will probably be the last chipset ATI will make for intel.

    haha dimitriman, i have links to that picture in ur avatar :P even videos
    E6600 @ 3.6
    IN9 32x MAX
    EVGA 8800Ultra
    750W

  18. #18
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    looks like the competition between nVidia and ATi isn't dead yet
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  19. #19
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    it all depends on the gpu! 700= transistors is alot of space and nvidia could have something up their sleve. and if the r600 has 64 shaders and the nvidia has 128 then i think it is an even match or mabye even in nvidias favor because 128 shaders is a lot of power!!!!!!!!! and there is no point to having so much unused bandwith. so only time will tell if all this bandwith is a waste. looks to be a beast tho
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Quote Originally Posted by Turtle 1
    Dam thats impressive. If true I guess I will have to buy an AMD product.

    If this is true . Would SLI G80 be competitive to 1 R600? I read the G80 info and its 125 shaders. But keep in mind that 64 R600 unified shaders = is 192 shaders.

    If this is true Its going to be a massive performer. How much $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
    Where are you getting your numbers from... 1 unified shader can't have 3 unified shaders tied to it. If it only has 64 unified shaders, it'll be just that..only 64 unified shaders. With a 500 million transistor die size, 192 shaders is a physical impossibility.

    Either way, it sounds like ATi isn't out of the fight yet, but NVidia is going to get the christmas shoppers money either way.
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    135
    2 of these, a kentsfield, rd600 and 4gig d9-ram and I'm set.
    [Core 2 Quadro QX6700 @ 3.20Ghz] [Tuniq Tower 120] [Abit IN9 32X MAX nForce-680i SLI] [4x1024 PC2-6400 Team Xtreem @ 3338 400Mhz] [Geforce GTX 260 216 55nm @ 655/1408/2100 SLI] [2x74GB WD Raptor 10000RPM] [Tagan TurboJet 1100W] [7x TT Blue Led VR] [CoolerMaster Stacker 830 Evolution] [Samsung SH-S183A SATA] [Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC] [Logitech Z-5500]

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rotterdam
    Posts
    1,553
    Quote Originally Posted by theteamaqua
    u know i might jsut wait for this, as my GeForce 7800GTX SLI is not doing too bad even for the graphic intense games like Oblivion

    but ATI + intel dont really have any future in multi GPU as RD600 will probably be the last chipset ATI will make for intel.

    haha dimitriman, i have links to that picture in ur avatar :P even videos
    post some vid;s, haven't seen many yet :P

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hopatcong, NJ
    Posts
    1,078
    I think people are drawing the 192 number in the fact that the R580 has 16 pixel pipelines and 48 shaders. So they naturally assume to multiply the number by 3 to get number of total unified shaders? Just a thought......

    'Gaming' AMD FX-6300 @ 4.5GHz | Asus M5A97 | 16GB DDR3 2133MHz | GTX760 2GB + Antec Kuhler620 mod | Crucial m4 64GB + WD Blue 2x1TB Str
    'HTPC' AMD A8-3820 @ 3.5GHz | Biostar TA75A+ | 4GB DDR3 | Momentus XT 500GB | Radeon 7950 3GB
    'Twitch' AMD 720BE @ 3.5GHz | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-S2P | 4GB DDR3 | Avermedia Game Broadcaster

    Desktop Audio: Optical Out > Matrix mini DAC > Virtue Audio ONE.2 > Tannoy Reveal Monitors + Energy Encore 8 Sub
    HTPC: Optoma HD131XE Projector + Yamaha RX-V463 + 3.2 Speaker Setup

  24. #24
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by ettis
    2 of these, a kentsfield, rd600 and 4gig d9-ram and I'm set.
    yeah for about a year, then you'll have to upgrade again
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  25. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,533
    Quote Originally Posted by rpg711
    but its unified remember that, so it can have 16 pipes and 176 pixel shaders, or 176 pipes and 16 shaders
    You the man . and you are correct

Page 1 of 6 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •