Nut sure how real or accurate this are but we get the 1st leaked benchs.
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=23032
Nut sure how real or accurate this are but we get the 1st leaked benchs.
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.php?item=23032
these have been circulating for weeks now.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
SKYMTL has been very positive of Fermi over at HWC, he certainly is not setting up a bad tone for it. I really have my doubts he could be so positive knowing it is a fail... and Charlie is hardly credible, he can make all sorts of claims and hope he is right with some but the majority of the time he is wrong.
Originally Posted by motown_steve
Every genocide that was committed during the 20th century has been preceded by the disarmament of the target population. Once the government outlaws your guns your life becomes a luxury afforded to you by the state. You become a tool to benefit the state. Should you cease to benefit the state or even worse become an annoyance or even a hindrance to the state then your life becomes more trouble than it is worth.
Once the government outlaws your guns your life is forfeit. You're already dead, it's just a question of when they are going to get around to you.
Unless my timezone causes me to become blind (4 AM), I can't see why the marked out parts are.... marked out.
Top Part:
Benchmark: PCGH-Save "From Hell's Heart"/Enthusiast details
Res./FSAA/AF: 1.920x1200/4x MSAA (in-Game)/No AF (Driver)
Date Published: 26 March 2010
Bottom Part:
Core i7 @ 3.5GHz, 175x20; SMT/TM off), Intel x58, 3x2.048MB DDR3-1400 (7-7-7-21)
Maybe it's just fake? I just can't figure out why those spots are marked out....
Great blurring, I for one totally didn't see the 1920x1200, 4xAA, no AF settings
Crysis performance doesn't look too good, unfortunately. With a slightly overclocked new 5870 product ATI will be easily able to surpass it in Crysis.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
They really should close down the website and come back as "rarelyifeveraccurate.com"
Likely they amongst a few other websites are just upset they'll never get review cards spewing all the BS they spew. Not trying to be a Nvidia fanboy just reading their comments and putting them into perspective.
PC1 EVGA Nvidia 790i Ultra | E8400 Retail @ 4.05GHz 1.35v | 8GB Mushkin Ascent @ DDR3-1680 | 2xBFG GTX 280 SLI @ stock | 30" Dell 3008WFP @ 2560x1600 XHD | XFI Fatality | 3x256GB Corsair(Samsung) SSD Raid0 & 1TB Samsung Backup | LG DVD / CDRW | NEC DVD DL 16x | CoolerMaster Stacker 830 8x120mm high 110 CFM per fan| 1000w Corsair SLI certified | Scythe Infinity (dremel mod to avoid caps on board)
PC2 (Wife) ASUS P5WDH Bios 1101 | E6400 Retail @ 3.2 | 4GB Corsair 6400C4 | 1xBFG GTX 260 @ stock | 24" Dell 2405FPW @ 1920x1200 XHD | XFI Xtrememusic | 2x150G Raptor Raid0 & 1TB WD Backup | Pioneer DVD | CoolerMaster Stacker 830 | 850w PCP&C | Stock HSF
Oh and actually I didn't even need to "try" to read it.... it's all the same as previously, apart from 16:1 AF to No AF :P.
5890 can and thus will happen.
Virtually all 5870 (850Mhz) can max out overdrive at 900. Most cards do around 920-935 @1.15V. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that better binning or 1.2V could get 950Mhz. But to stay within 225W, probably binning.
Memory on 5870 (1200) overclocks to 1300. I doubt AMD will bother trying to source some rare uber high end GDDR5, since most of performance improvement is from core overclocking.
Therefore, "5870 OC" is probably gonna be something like 950/1250 2GB (with overdrive headroom up to 1000). Despite +12% clock, performance probably only +5%... you know, diminishing returns.
===========
if I recall correctly, 5870 is 4 phase, and 5850 is 3 phase. For 4890 (5 phase?), AMD made better than 4870 PCB.. maybe they'll reuse that idea..
Last edited by ***Deimos***; 03-23-2010 at 07:22 PM.
24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V
I'm wondering though (after looking at all the other reviews, Hemlock launch, Cypress launch, 5850 launch, 4890 etc): this is the only 1 where it says No AF (driver) instead of 16:1 AF (driver), as if they could not force AF with Fermi?...
Did not see this posted, if it was my apologies. Talks about the launch for Fermi and that they will have 2x more than 5800 series launch did.
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/News...id=1240&page=0
PC1 EVGA Nvidia 790i Ultra | E8400 Retail @ 4.05GHz 1.35v | 8GB Mushkin Ascent @ DDR3-1680 | 2xBFG GTX 280 SLI @ stock | 30" Dell 3008WFP @ 2560x1600 XHD | XFI Fatality | 3x256GB Corsair(Samsung) SSD Raid0 & 1TB Samsung Backup | LG DVD / CDRW | NEC DVD DL 16x | CoolerMaster Stacker 830 8x120mm high 110 CFM per fan| 1000w Corsair SLI certified | Scythe Infinity (dremel mod to avoid caps on board)
PC2 (Wife) ASUS P5WDH Bios 1101 | E6400 Retail @ 3.2 | 4GB Corsair 6400C4 | 1xBFG GTX 260 @ stock | 24" Dell 2405FPW @ 1920x1200 XHD | XFI Xtrememusic | 2x150G Raptor Raid0 & 1TB WD Backup | Pioneer DVD | CoolerMaster Stacker 830 | 850w PCP&C | Stock HSF
And this... GTX 480 sample with 512 SPs and possible 600Mhz (1200Mhz).
Be aware that the 5870 is set as reference card, so those are not FPSs in the graph below, but differences in %.
Tested games, 2560*1600:
Call of Duty World at War, 4xAA, 16xAF
Company of Heroes, Opposing Fronts
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Clear Sky, NoAA, NoAF
Call of Juarez: Bound in Blood, Maxed
Enemy Territory: Quake Wors, 8xAA, 16xAF
Farcry 2, DX10, HDR On, 4xAA
Crysis Warhead DX10
Dawn of War 2, Ultra
Fallout 3, Ultra, High-Res Texture Pack
HAWX, DX10, SSAO Very High, 4xAA
Resident Evil 5, DX10, Maxed
Wolfenstein, 8xAA, 8xAF, Maxed
Batman: Arkham Asylum, NoAA, Maxed
The scores were a little higher for the ES card with the second set of drivers but nothing record-braking.
Core temp idle was 58C, core temp load around 86-90C, which was good.
It's laud, but not 5800Ultra.
In the tesselation tests, the GTX-ul won with +53% vs 5870, but this is as relevant as the 5-point parallelism issue where the The tesselation performance wasRAdeon wins with 350%+.
Idle power is at least 3 times that of the 5870 and the drained power at load was 283W. The official 480 will have less drained power because it will have a whole shader cluster disabled.
Source: http://forums.amd.com/forum/messagev...VIEWTMP=Linear
Last edited by ethomaz; 03-23-2010 at 07:51 PM.
in that graph the 5870 beats 480 in Warhead, but from other benchies we know 480 is actually faster. So the 700mhz has definitely sped everything up, so we can expect somewhat higher than the scores there, still not record breaking.
also, this is obv. where Charlie was getting his estimates from. Looks like the increase from 600mhz to 700mhz will prove him wrong, not by much though
Last edited by annihilat0r; 03-23-2010 at 08:06 PM.
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
By pure math...
32 shaders would be about 6.5% of the shading, lost...
but you'd gain about 17% clock rate... on the cores alone... and a good chunk more memory bandwidth.
You'd also be speeding up the ROP's whereas more cores don't do that alone...
Additionally the TMU's would be sped up as those are tied to the core clock and not shaders as far as I'm aware...
He also said the newer drivers added a couple % performance...
Also worth noting, this guy claims his Engineering Sample card had 512 shaders @ 600mhz, 1200mhz shader, and 2800 (GDDR5) RAM: full specs should be 480 shaders @ 700mhz, 1400mhz shader, and 3600-3700 (GDDR5) RAM.
So my guess is that with those #'s considered, it would be maybe 16-17% better performance for 700mhz @ 480 cores, vs. 600mhz @ 512 cores, taking into account the memory frequency as well. Couple that with a couple of extra percent from those tests adding 3% (he said a few) and we might see a graph looking a bit more favorable. Still, if this guy's accurate, it wouldn't be enough to make it what I would call a clean win for nV here.
Last edited by GoldenTiger; 03-23-2010 at 08:13 PM.
I wouldn't say it reflects market share more than anything else. I'd say market share might be a small factor though. Regardless of how much, the end result is still that nv's drivers were inferior to ATi's, so the anti-ATi driver crusade has no merit.
When the earthquake hit Chile, you were the first one I thought of (i'm not familiar with anyone else from Chile). I hope things are OK down there for you and yours.
Bookmarks