Page 7 of 19 FirstFirst ... 4567891017 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 466

Thread: HD 6990 Preview/Review

  1. #151
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    Quote Originally Posted by cobra_kai View Post
    The scale on that graph is absurd...
    Entirely agreed.
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  2. #152
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,782
    For $700, it can sit on a store shelf somewhere until hell freezes over, or I change my underwear, whichever comes first.
    As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"

  3. #153
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    Or you could pre-order for the staggering price of €715 (that is ~1000USD)

    John
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  4. #154
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    511
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeBar View Post
    I totally agree with u. I've tried these dual card/singe slot solutions and i can say that if you want CF/SLI do it the right way...
    yea but sometimes people prefer it.. i myself would prefer this to dual 6970's if i was still on water and was using my stacker..i just switched but before i would of definitely went this route being as they perform pretty much identical.
    mainly for the reason of a single card looks cleaner imo and needs less cabling also keeping the interior cleaner while still maintaining the same performance..

    of course price would have to cost a little less then 2x6970s

  5. #155
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    isnt it cheaper to buy 1 6990 waterblock than 2 6970 blocks?
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  6. #156
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nordschleife!
    Posts
    705
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    looking at the one review, the perf difference at 1920x1200 is like 1-2%, but at 2560x1600 was like 2-5%, so i can only imagine it gets worse as you go higher
    Yup, perf diff will undoubtely increase as res. goes up but I'm eager to see how much. I'm building a SB rig for gaming so I'm limited at 2x8 pcie lanes with 2 cards CF/SLI and I'm very curious if this will be a bottleneck considering the firepower provided by 2x6870 at Eyefinity resolutions. Couldn't find a reliable article on this subject, though.
    Murray Walker: "And there are flames coming from the back of Prost's McLaren as he enters the Swimming Pool."

    James Hunt: "Well, that should put them out then."

  7. #157
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    TPU did a quick review of pci lanes and perf loss, i think back with 5870s
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  8. #158
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nordschleife!
    Posts
    705
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    TPU did a quick review of pci lanes and perf loss, i think back with 5870s
    Thanks for the tip. I'll check it out.
    Murray Walker: "And there are flames coming from the back of Prost's McLaren as he enters the Swimming Pool."

    James Hunt: "Well, that should put them out then."

  9. #159
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    409
    HardOCP did a similar test too. IIRC the results were a bit contradicting against the TPU test. But I would not be surprised if 8x bottlenecks a 6990.

    As for the loudness of the card coming, just look up the xfx 5970 limited edition review that uses basically the same cooler. It's loud as hell, though the temps stay decent. Now add 100 W more load to that and you have 6990. The temps will go through the roof regardless of the already insane fan speed. This card really will need water to be usable. I don't think even an accelero xtreme could keep the card cool properly.

    With a ~700$ price tag it just makes no sense. Two unlocked 6950's is the way to go if you want performance at a decent price. Or 570 SLI if you want quieter cards.
    "No, you'll warrant no villain's exposition from me."

  10. #160
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nordschleife!
    Posts
    705
    Quote Originally Posted by Pantsu View Post
    HardOCP did a similar test too. IIRC the results were a bit contradicting against the TPU test. But I would not be surprised if 8x bottlenecks a 6990.
    Dual cards in CF/SLI would be 2x8 pcie on socket 1155. One 6990 or the rumored dual Fermi card would be at 16x pcie lanes.
    Murray Walker: "And there are flames coming from the back of Prost's McLaren as he enters the Swimming Pool."

    James Hunt: "Well, that should put them out then."

  11. #161
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    Quote Originally Posted by Caparroz View Post
    Dual cards in CF/SLI would be 2x8 pcie on socket 1155. One 6990 or the rumored dual Fermi card would be at 16x pcie lanes.
    but still 8x per gpu.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  12. #162
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    they share the same bandwith on the pci express .... ( but maybe i miss something )
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  13. #163
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    511
    Quote Originally Posted by Lanek View Post
    they share the same bandwith on the pci express .... ( but maybe i miss something )
    just that xfire 2 different cards = 8x per card
    6990 on 1 16x is 2 gpus on 16x ..16/2 = theoretically 8x per gpu.

  14. #164
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    Im going to jump on the 2x 6950 boat and say that would be the best bet again for MOST people because. you get the same perf. You get quieter cards, all the ehat get dumped out the back of your case. You can use AIR cooling practically, it's cheaper and 2 cards just looks plain cool
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  15. #165
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nordschleife!
    Posts
    705
    Quote Originally Posted by STEvil View Post
    but still 8x per gpu.
    Nope. One card CF/SLI ala 6990 gets full 16 pcie lanes. There's no pcie splited lanes because there aren't two devices sharing the bus.
    Murray Walker: "And there are flames coming from the back of Prost's McLaren as he enters the Swimming Pool."

    James Hunt: "Well, that should put them out then."

  16. #166

  17. #167
    Xtreme Addict Chrono Detector's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,142
    AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160

  18. #168

  19. #169
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    227
    Antec 900
    Corsair TX750
    Gigabyte EP45 UD3P
    Q9550 E0 500x8 4.0 GHZ 1.360v
    ECO A.L.C Cooler with Gentle Typhoon PushPull
    Kingston HyperX T1 5-5-5-18 1:1
    XFX Radeon 6950 @ 880/1300 (Shader unlocked)
    WD Caviar Black 2 x 640GB - Short Stroked 120GB RAID0 128KB Stripe - 540GB RAID1

  20. #170

  21. #171
    Xtreme Addict Chrono Detector's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1,142
    Time for you to update the first post, onetreehill.

    Anyway, the card performance looks quite nice, though it does consume a lot of power, but that was expected due to reusing 40nm. Though GTX 580 SLI wins most of the time.
    AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160

  22. #172
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nordschleife!
    Posts
    705
    Bring me Eyefinity reviews...
    Murray Walker: "And there are flames coming from the back of Prost's McLaren as he enters the Swimming Pool."

    James Hunt: "Well, that should put them out then."

  23. #173
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247
    Quote Originally Posted by Chrono Detector View Post
    Time for you to update the first post, onethreehill.....
    First post updated

  24. #174

  25. #175
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    227
    Quote Originally Posted by Chrono Detector View Post
    Time for you to update the first post, onetreehill.

    Anyway, the card performance looks quite nice, though it does consume a lot of power, but that was expected due to reusing 40nm. Though GTX 580 SLI wins most of the time.
    I never really expected it to be faster than 580 SLI, but at least it's practically 6970CF performance, which I am rather glad of.
    Antec 900
    Corsair TX750
    Gigabyte EP45 UD3P
    Q9550 E0 500x8 4.0 GHZ 1.360v
    ECO A.L.C Cooler with Gentle Typhoon PushPull
    Kingston HyperX T1 5-5-5-18 1:1
    XFX Radeon 6950 @ 880/1300 (Shader unlocked)
    WD Caviar Black 2 x 640GB - Short Stroked 120GB RAID0 128KB Stripe - 540GB RAID1

Page 7 of 19 FirstFirst ... 4567891017 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •