Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 72

Thread: 939 FX-53 Not OC Pi32M!

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882

    939 FX-53 Not OC Pi32M!



    MB:K8T800Pro

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    VIENNA
    Posts
    632
    is there also a super pi 1m result?
    Overclocking made in Austria

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882
    Originally posted by EmineM
    is there also a super pi 1m result?

    this CPU-Z is Old

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    2,038
    socket 939?
    really?
    I love XS

    Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications

    I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92

  5. #5
    Xtreme 3DMark Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,225
    so how much faster is it in 3dmark? and I cant see the numbers of superpi and I wouldnt understand the differences anyway. also that ram timing is bad. 2-2-2-5 rocks.
    3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
    9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!

    9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
    9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
    9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
    9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
    3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
    Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
    3dmark scores with older gpus
    Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    2,038
    I dont know IF 35s at Pi 1M, 304 for cpumark or 31 min at Pi 32M is good compared to the FX53 S940 with the same timings of course.
    I love XS

    Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications

    I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882
    Originally posted by cpulloverclock
    socket 939?
    really?
    ya.....use this Mainboard

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,626
    I was wondering what the importance of this was. You got the board and the 939 chip already? Yikes. Sweet.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    North America
    Posts
    2,038
    Originally posted by sxs112
    ya.....use this Mainboard
    ok 28+28+27+27 + 27*31-8 = 939 pins

    U are a beta tester??
    Last edited by cpulloverclock; 05-13-2004 at 05:54 AM.
    I love XS

    Road to CompTIA A+ (601, 602) and Network+ (N10-003) Certifications

    I want a Penryn 3.33G 12MB & quad sli Nvidia G92

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,068
    Good ole Asus board eh?

    How you like it though?

    `s

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    35s SuperPi 1M stock is not bad. Could you say something about o/cing potential? Is it possible to tighten the timings at least tRCD?
    3DMark run?

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882
    Originally posted by `schr0et
    Good ole Asus board eh?

    How you like it though?

    `s
    ASUS takes to my question to be least, therefore I only then am willing to use their product. If has a better choice, I certainly or can choose others' product

  13. #13
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882
    Originally posted by cpulloverclock
    ok 28+28+27+27 + 27*31-8 = 939 pins

    U are a beta tester??
    Friend of mine tests

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Wellington, Kansas USA
    Posts
    609
    That's a pretty insane score I think for a chip at stock speeds! I can only do 34 seconds at the speed in my sig!

  15. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882
    Originally posted by QuadDamage
    35s SuperPi 1M stock is not bad. Could you say something about o/cing potential? Is it possible to tighten the timings at least tRCD?
    3DMark run?
    Because is the VIA ES board, therefore the not O/C option, runs 3dmark2001 is does not have the question

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    279
    I have my 940 pin FX53 running 32m atm with your timings. i can tell that that 939s is faster. im getting 13m 07s @ loop 10. I also have antivirus running and a bunch of other junk running tho.

    I will post a screeny as soon as its done.

    [ TEAM PUSS ]

    01= 34.3k x800pro
    03= 14.4k 6800gt

  17. #17
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    117
    damn fast...

  18. #18
    AMD Fanboy
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Luis Obispo, California
    Posts
    2,251
    sxs112:
    you can use clockgen to overclock that maybe
    Dell Studio XPS16... no desktop
    yes i have AIM, yes you can send me a message. EvilSpork3 i dare you.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882
    Originally posted by Evil_Spork
    sxs112:
    you can use clockgen to overclock that maybe
    soft not support

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    279
    Ok here is a stock 940s FX53 on a untweaked OS with nortons runnning.




    [ TEAM PUSS ]

    01= 34.3k x800pro
    03= 14.4k 6800gt

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    Originally posted by Evil_Spork
    sxs112:
    you can use clockgen to overclock that maybe
    i'm sure clockgen doesn't support this chipset yet.

    I can tell it's very fast. Too bad it's an ES mobo.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    279
    Im going to run it again with nortons and everything turned off with auto timings in the bios which i feel is better to find a stock score..

    edit: stock fx53 940 run with nothing running in the background

    Last edited by yuri; 05-13-2004 at 08:14 AM.

    [ TEAM PUSS ]

    01= 34.3k x800pro
    03= 14.4k 6800gt

  23. #23
    THE ORIGINAL OC JEDI
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Field of Battle
    Posts
    8,973
    Hmmmm....
    So the 939 looks APPRECIABLY faster... now the next questions are:
    How does it OC?
    How will the Mobo/Chipsets perform?
    When will it be here?
    How does it do with BH-5 and tight timings/high fsb with locked pci/agp??

    C

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    279
    Originally posted by charlie
    Hmmmm....
    So the 939 looks APPRECIABLY faster... now the next questions are:
    How does it OC?
    How will the Mobo/Chipsets perform?
    When will it be here?
    How does it do with BH-5 and tight timings/high fsb with locked pci/agp??

    C
    yes it does

    btw since i was at it i ran a max bench also (temps @ 3c)


    [ TEAM PUSS ]

    01= 34.3k x800pro
    03= 14.4k 6800gt

  25. #25
    Xtreme Infrastructure Eng
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,184
    Nice, this is looking promising...

    Now I just have to decide between a 939 or a 3.0c

    hmmmmmm
    Less is more.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •