XtremeSystems Forums

Go Back   XtremeSystems Forums > Xtreme > Xtreme News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-04-2005, 11:42 AM   #1
Cooper
Xtreme Workhorse
 
Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,490
News: Intel`s future overview

Very big article posted on THG.
Here`s quick view into Intel`s future desktop names :

Single-core :
Prescott 2M (90nm, 2MB L2) -> CedarMill (65nm, 2MB L2) -> Millville (65nm, 1MB L2) -> Perryville (45nm, 2MB L2).

Dual-core :
Smithfield (90nm, 2х1MB L2) -> Presler (65nm, 2x2MB L2) -> Conroe (65nm, 4MB L2), Allendale (65nm, 2MB L2) -> Wolfdale (45nm, 3MB L2).

Quad-core :
Kentsfield (65nm, 2x2MB L2) -> Redgefield (45nm, 6MB L2) -> Bloomfield.

Octal-core :
Yorkfield (45nm, 4x3MB L2, multi-die)

Quote:
Originally Posted by THG
The introduction of the Merom design will be a turning point in Intel's product policy, because it will be the backbone for all processor families that go into the desktop, the mobile or the enterprise space
Attached Images
 

Last edited by Cooper; 12-04-2005 at 11:54 AM.
Cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 11:59 AM   #2
perkam
Live Long And Overclock
 
perkam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,513
Send a message via MSN to perkam Send a message via Yahoo to perkam
Quote:
Quad-core :
Kentsfield (65nm, 2x2MB L2) -> Redgefield (45nm, 6MB L2) -> Bloomfield.

Octal-core :
Yorkfield (45nm, 4x3MB L2, multi-die)
There go my upgrade plans out the window ...or maybe not...Conroe isn't out for a while...if sM2 comes out first

Perkam
__________________

Star Trek Online Open Beta
Name: Captain Maxentius
Rank: Lt.
Ship: USS Kira
Class: Miranda-Class
Preferred Class: Akira-Class

Last edited by perkam; 12-04-2005 at 12:01 PM.
perkam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 12:00 PM   #3
Cooper
Xtreme Workhorse
 
Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
There go my upgrade plans out the window

Perkam
You still have 3 more years till those arrive
Cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 12:02 PM   #4
perkam
Live Long And Overclock
 
perkam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,513
Send a message via MSN to perkam Send a message via Yahoo to perkam
I know...I'll ze wait zen zee zwat z A.M.Z has in ztore for me.

Perkam
__________________

Star Trek Online Open Beta
Name: Captain Maxentius
Rank: Lt.
Ship: USS Kira
Class: Miranda-Class
Preferred Class: Akira-Class
perkam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 12:17 PM   #5
NeGe0
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Elizabeth, NJ
Posts: 263
Send a message via AIM to NeGe0
Quote:
Originally Posted by perkam
I know...I'll ze wait zen zee zwat z A.M.Z has in ztore for me.

Perkam
LMFAO...I want to see the same thing. I just hope there are better solutions for Intel so it's not just a simple answer and to go with AMD. Then I'd be able to choose the best chip for the best price.
__________________
NeGe0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 12:30 PM   #6
freecableguy
Banned
 
freecableguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Jose or bust
Posts: 4,115
Send a message via MSN to freecableguy
Penryn will be the big one, trust me
freecableguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 04:49 PM   #7
RAMMAN
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
RAMMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 559
octal-core wtf! anyway kentsfield could be around sooner than you think if amd releases their quad-cores in 2007.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Gigabyte ep45-ud3lr
XFX GTX 260 216sp
Team Xtreem 2*1gb 1300
74gb Raptor
RAMMAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 06:58 PM   #8
[XC] moddolicous
XS_THE_MACHINE
 
[XC] moddolicous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,984
Send a message via AIM to [XC] moddolicous
Octal core, does that mean 8 PHYSICAL cores with hyperthreading, or 4 PHYSICAL cores with hyperthreading? That is gonna be like $3k!
__________________
"Victory is always possible for the person who refuses to stop fighting"

clicks to save kids
[XC] moddolicous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 07:14 PM   #9
AkXb70
Xtreme Member
 
AkXb70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by moddolicous
Octal core, does that mean 8 PHYSICAL cores with hyperthreading, or 4 PHYSICAL cores with hyperthreading? That is gonna be like $3k!
8 physical cores...i think thats server only at first though
AkXb70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 07:33 PM   #10
Turok
Xtreme Addict
 
Turok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,593
I wonder how much time it will take games and other applications to fully benefit from multicore solutions.
If dual core was just introduced on the ATi and nVidia drivers, and only the most popular games with the most advanced engines support it , how much time will it take to split it up to 4 cores and latter on to 8 cores.
I dont even think the PS3 will benefit from the 8 cores it has.
__________________
LCD Buyer's Guide
Turok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 07:42 PM   #11
zabomb4163
Xtreme Addict
 
zabomb4163's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,164
7 cores on the playstation not 8 =)
zabomb4163 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 08:08 PM   #12
nn_step
YouTube Addict
 
nn_step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In textbooks
Posts: 17,737
Quote:
Octal-core :
Yorkfield (45nm, 4x3MB L2, multi-die)
Um i would hate to burst your bubble but it is 8x512kb L2
__________________
Impossible is not a fact; it is an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration; it is a dare.
It's hardware that makes a machine fast. It's software that makes a fast machine slow.
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
Algorithms + Data Structures = Programs
And all of that source is portable, except for this tiny kernel that you can (provably: I did it) re-write totally from scratch in less than a year without having /any/ prior knowledge.
-Linus Torvalds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANtpsunRYIs
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_lis...23537556D7AADB
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTcFLp1uVZ4
Science is simply common sense at its best that is, rigidly accurate in observation, and merciless to fallacy in logic.
http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2009/...raindamage.jpg
nn_step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 08:12 PM   #13
AkXb70
Xtreme Member
 
AkXb70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
Um i would hate to burst your bubble but it is 8x512kb L2
12MB/4=3MB....unless im missing something (theres 4 dual core, or 2 quad core chips IIRC)

anyways, it leaves 1.5MB per core
AkXb70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 08:42 PM   #14
perkam
Live Long And Overclock
 
perkam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 14,513
Send a message via MSN to perkam Send a message via Yahoo to perkam
Let's hope the conroe hits closer to second half q6

Perkam
__________________

Star Trek Online Open Beta
Name: Captain Maxentius
Rank: Lt.
Ship: USS Kira
Class: Miranda-Class
Preferred Class: Akira-Class
perkam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 09:56 PM   #15
nn_step
YouTube Addict
 
nn_step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In textbooks
Posts: 17,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by AkXb70
12MB/4=3MB....unless im missing something (theres 4 dual core, or 2 quad core chips IIRC)

anyways, it leaves 1.5MB per core
I said 512Kb per core
__________________
Impossible is not a fact; it is an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration; it is a dare.
It's hardware that makes a machine fast. It's software that makes a fast machine slow.
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
Algorithms + Data Structures = Programs
And all of that source is portable, except for this tiny kernel that you can (provably: I did it) re-write totally from scratch in less than a year without having /any/ prior knowledge.
-Linus Torvalds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANtpsunRYIs
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_lis...23537556D7AADB
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTcFLp1uVZ4
Science is simply common sense at its best that is, rigidly accurate in observation, and merciless to fallacy in logic.
http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2009/...raindamage.jpg
nn_step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 09:58 PM   #16
AkXb70
Xtreme Member
 
AkXb70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
I said 512Kb per core
....512KB is .5MB not 1.5

12MB/8cores is 1.5...not .5 i still dont get where youre comming from?

8X512K would only give 4MB TOTAL
AkXb70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2005, 09:17 AM   #17
nn_step
YouTube Addict
 
nn_step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In textbooks
Posts: 17,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by AkXb70
....512KB is .5MB not 1.5

12MB/8cores is 1.5...not .5 i still dont get where youre comming from?

8X512K would only give 4MB TOTAL
I mean it isn't going to have 12MB total L2, it is going to have a net distributed L2 totalling 4MB or is that to complicated?
__________________
Impossible is not a fact; it is an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration; it is a dare.
It's hardware that makes a machine fast. It's software that makes a fast machine slow.
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
Algorithms + Data Structures = Programs
And all of that source is portable, except for this tiny kernel that you can (provably: I did it) re-write totally from scratch in less than a year without having /any/ prior knowledge.
-Linus Torvalds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANtpsunRYIs
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_lis...23537556D7AADB
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTcFLp1uVZ4
Science is simply common sense at its best that is, rigidly accurate in observation, and merciless to fallacy in logic.
http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2009/...raindamage.jpg
nn_step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2005, 11:10 AM   #18
onewingedangel
Xtreme Addict
 
onewingedangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 1,140
These processors are so far out that arguing over the specifics seems a bit pointless as it will all be speculation, but going on what THG says yorkfield and harpetown have 12mb cache shared between 8 cores - thats 1.5mb per core. And judging by the timeframes given it would suggest a 4 wolfdale core multi chip module (4x 3mb cache dual cores). But given intels past history, the chips are likely to alter somewhat before they are near production.
onewingedangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2005, 03:28 PM   #19
AkXb70
Xtreme Member
 
AkXb70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
I mean it isn't going to have 12MB total L2, it is going to have a net distributed L2 totalling 4MB or is that to complicated?
so where exactly are you getting that from? everything on that pg says 12MB.

if you can show me another source that says 4MB, ok (although that seems a bit celeronish to me) but this is the 1st ive even heard of these chips from any place
AkXb70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2005, 09:35 PM   #20
nn_step
YouTube Addict
 
nn_step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In textbooks
Posts: 17,737
Think about it.. The Sandy's 1MB Cache is larger than the actual rest of the CPU..
Now imagine how large the Die would have to be if 3/4 of it was just Cache at only 1/4 the current area of processes
__________________
Impossible is not a fact; it is an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration; it is a dare.
It's hardware that makes a machine fast. It's software that makes a fast machine slow.
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
Algorithms + Data Structures = Programs
And all of that source is portable, except for this tiny kernel that you can (provably: I did it) re-write totally from scratch in less than a year without having /any/ prior knowledge.
-Linus Torvalds

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANtpsunRYIs
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_lis...23537556D7AADB
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTcFLp1uVZ4
Science is simply common sense at its best that is, rigidly accurate in observation, and merciless to fallacy in logic.
http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2009/...raindamage.jpg
nn_step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2005, 09:42 PM   #21
AkXb70
Xtreme Member
 
AkXb70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
Think about it.. The Sandy's 1MB Cache is larger than the actual rest of the CPU..
Now imagine how large the Die would have to be if 3/4 of it was just Cache at only 1/4 the current area of processes
this isnt one die. it will be either 2 quads or 4 duals. (or maybe something else) a 45nm dual core chip with 3MB L2 shouldnt be too hard for intel to make. putting 4 under one heat spreader shouldnt be that difficult either, especially if intel changes the geometry of the socket. (although, they probably wont...look at dempsey, 2 90n, 2MB L2 cores under one heat spreader, and prescott's cache, even at 2MB doesnt take up much space in comparison to the rest of the core)

Last edited by AkXb70; 12-05-2005 at 09:45 PM.
AkXb70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2005, 11:48 PM   #22
$a1Ty
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 309
knowing intel they will all have a new socket
$a1Ty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 02:27 AM   #23
saaya
Xtreme X.I.P.
 
saaya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 臺北 (Taipei)
Posts: 31,271
Send a message via MSN to saaya Send a message via Yahoo to saaya
hmmmm why a step back in cache size?
hmmmmm

great news! thx for posting cooper
__________________
.
Nvidia: Tesla C2050 and C2070 products (GT300) will retail for $2,499 and $3,999

JHH (Nvidia) sep 2009: The best way to always be the number1 is to have no backup plan link
JHH (Nvidia) nov 2009: Tolerance for failure is important, it puts our employees in a position where they are willing to try new ideas link


Solus Corvus - maybe things would get better if people addressed the content of each others posts instead of trying to discredit each other with insults and poisoning the well. Attack the argument not the person.


Hail Voltage! The Solution to AND Source of all our Hardware Problems
saaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 09:59 AM   #24
Revv23
I am Xtreme
 
Revv23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,843
Send a message via AIM to Revv23
hmm so which single core is the one based on dothan? millville?

is cedar mill just a shrunk prescott?

preseler is the 65nm netburtst dual core right? conroe is to be yonah based?
Revv23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2005, 10:16 AM   #25
Cooper
Xtreme Workhorse
 
Cooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 4,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
hmm so which single core is the one based on dothan? millville?

is cedar mill just a shrunk prescott?

preseler is the 65nm netburtst dual core right? conroe is to be yonah based?
Well the only thing you`re right about is 65nm cedarmill & presler
Conroe will take some from P6 (Dothan, Yonah) and NetBurst architectures
Cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
XtremeSystems