XtremeSystems Forums

Go Back   XtremeSystems Forums > Hardware > Intel

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 11-28-2009, 06:04 PM   #1
Loser777
Xtreme Addict
 
Loser777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,457
Send a message via AIM to Loser777
On the knife's edge, again...

I never quite got my Q6600 400x9 100% stable even though I managed to achieve this:

That setup would never again run 400x9 past Prime95 8 Hours or Linpack 2GB 10 loops no matter what setup I tried.
Eventually, I narrowed it down to my dying power supply (which finally popped in August)

Thanks to black friday, I got a new power supply, but I'm running into trouble again. This time, I'm on Windows 7 //Linpack 64bit so stability is going to be a little harder to achieve, but I'm running into a brick wall again @ LinX 2GB.
I just can't pass 20 loops no matter that settings I try... I've gotten to about 17 and a half with no errors, but I'll get a BSOD right after that.

Settings right now:
P5Q-E
1.3875v vCore (1.400v LOAD)
1.36v VTT
1.62v PLL
1.26v NB
These are much higher than what was originally quasi-stable on my old PSU, yet I'm no closer...
With these settings, temps are usually in the low 90s during 2GB linpack.

What's keeping me from getting there?
__________________
MAIN RIG Revived 11/27/2009
ASUS P5Q-E
Q6600 @ 3.4GHz
1.2625v vCore
1.50v PLL (STOCK )
1.20v VTT (STOCK )
1.10v NB (STOCK )
24+ hrs P95 Stable, 20 loop Max mem Linpack stable
Loser777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 07:54 PM   #2
leo27
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sydney - Australia
Posts: 103
Thoses temps are way too high for linpack max intel recommends is 72C for 24/7 use, i know its just a stress test but your still very high.

Also vTT is supposed to be a bit higher than vCPU (take a look in the GTL settings thread post by mikeyakame) i.e my vCPU is 1.400 in windows and vTT is 1.42. Once temps are under control you'll problably need around 1.4-1.55v to be fully stable at 3.6Ghz. If you can't get it stable with these voltages then try for 3.5Ghz or a bit lower.

I'm not sure why you were partially stable previously and not now it could be that your new power supply supplies slightly less voltage on the supply rails.
__________________
ASUS Rampage Formula X48 (Bios 902) | Intel Q6600 @ 3.4Ghz (8x425) 1.400v (1.4125v BIOS) | 2x2GB GSKILL F2-6400CL4D-4GBPI-B @ 850Mhz 4-4-3-9-1-40-2-1 1.92v (1.86v Bios) PL7 AI Clock Twister Stronger DRAM Static Read Enabled
TRUE with 2 Noctua P12 Push/Pull + Pressure Mod | Antec P182 | Corsair 750W | BFG 280GTX OC 702/1404/1323 at 1.100V
leo27 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 08:21 PM   #3
Loser777
Xtreme Addict
 
Loser777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,457
Send a message via AIM to Loser777
If the temps are too high, why does it pass 17 iterations with no residual errors and then crash?
__________________
MAIN RIG Revived 11/27/2009
ASUS P5Q-E
Q6600 @ 3.4GHz
1.2625v vCore
1.50v PLL (STOCK )
1.20v VTT (STOCK )
1.10v NB (STOCK )
24+ hrs P95 Stable, 20 loop Max mem Linpack stable
Loser777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 08:53 PM   #4
Loser777
Xtreme Addict
 
Loser777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,457
Send a message via AIM to Loser777
BUMP, achieved this


Not sure if it would pass 20 iterations though- also I got LOG in Thermal- probably means that CPU would have throttled if TM was enabled.
__________________
MAIN RIG Revived 11/27/2009
ASUS P5Q-E
Q6600 @ 3.4GHz
1.2625v vCore
1.50v PLL (STOCK )
1.20v VTT (STOCK )
1.10v NB (STOCK )
24+ hrs P95 Stable, 20 loop Max mem Linpack stable
Loser777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 09:36 PM   #5
AH64
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Massachusetts, US
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by leo27 View Post
intel recommends is 72C for 24/7 use,
It'll go way past 90*c before it starts throttling at 99-100*c (TJMAX) But of course, the further away you are from tjmax, the better.
__________________
i7-920
EVGA X58 SLI LE
OCZ GOLD DDR3 4GB kit for now (Crucial Ballistix ddr3 1600 otw)
XFX xxx Edition HD4890 (950/1000mhz)
Corsair 850tx 850w
Coolermaster RC690
AH64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 09:56 PM   #6
Loser777
Xtreme Addict
 
Loser777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,457
Send a message via AIM to Loser777
Well, I think there are serious voltage scaling issues going on.
3.2GHz seems to be stable at stock 1.2125v, and 3.4GHz around the 1.25GHz mark.
Honestly, if I can go from 97C load to 70C load for 200MHz less, it doesn't look like much of a sacrifice.
__________________
MAIN RIG Revived 11/27/2009
ASUS P5Q-E
Q6600 @ 3.4GHz
1.2625v vCore
1.50v PLL (STOCK )
1.20v VTT (STOCK )
1.10v NB (STOCK )
24+ hrs P95 Stable, 20 loop Max mem Linpack stable
Loser777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 10:24 PM   #7
unclewebb
Xtreme Addict
 
unclewebb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cochrane, Canada
Posts: 1,753
When the LOG word shows up in RealTemp, that's a sign that at least one thermal throttling episode was logged since you pushed the power button. If that turns red and changes to HOT, that's a sign that thermal throttling is in progress. RealTemp reads the bit within the CPU so even if RealTemp wasn't running at the time, this bit would still get set and RealTemp would be able to read it after the fact. Thermal throttling can happen hundreds of times a second so when it first starts to happen it will mostly show LOG.

The 5C difference in your temperatures at full load is in my opinion a sign that TJMax is not set consistently across all 4 cores. I think Intel does this deliberately so all 4 cores don't thermal throttle at the exact same time. If you set TJMax to 100, 100, 105, 105 then you should see your 4 cores line up better and core 2 and core 3 will report more accurate temperatures.

Most CPUs lose stability when you get them this warm. Without better cooling you should probably reduce your overclock a couple of hundred MHz. If you don't run LinX 24/7 then you might be able to get away with 3600 MHz just fine for gaming and stuff like that. Real world temps are a lot less than LinX temperatures.

It's common for people to interchange Tcase temperature ratings and core temperatures. The two are not the same and shouldn't be compared. As long as your CPU is not thermal throttling and is running stable then your peak core temperature isn't that important. A little more room before the throttling point is always nice.

RealTemp 3.49
http://www.fileden.com/files/2008/3/...alTempBeta.zip

Last edited by unclewebb; 11-28-2009 at 10:28 PM.
unclewebb is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2009, 12:51 AM   #8
Leeghoofd
I am Xtreme
 
Leeghoofd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,717
Your CPU get's unstable due to high temps, think we've seen and told that before in all ya previous threads... you need to upgrade or revise ya cooling. Nothing more nothing less... If you have better cooling you can nibble of maybe some on the voltages...
__________________
Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved
Leeghoofd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
XtremeSystems