European MPs votes on new telecoms law

[zalbard]

Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/m

A major overhaul of telecoms law across Europe is due on 24 November as the European Parliament votes on new rules.

The package comes amid controversial laws being introduced in France and the UK to cut off persistent illegal downloaders.
Protecting internet access and users' rights was a high priority for MEPs hammering out the Telecoms Package.
Many critics say the eventual compromise solution is too weak and will not prevent disconnections.
Other measures in the telecoms package include an aim to harmonise the way mobile broadband is rolled out across the EU, which would help in the push to achieve 100% broadband coverage in Europe by 2013.
It also seeks to improve co-operation between member states' telecoms regulators and make it easier for incumbent operators to both provide and buy network services.
Two other parts of the telecoms package have already been approved.
A law on citizens' rights aims to improve how quickly customers can change their mobile telephone number and strengthen personal data and privacy protection by, for example, allowing users to opt in to the use the cookies.

Fair hearing

Perhaps the most scrutinised part of the package is that which relates to file-sharing.
It comes as individual member states introduce tough penalties for those who download content illegally.
France has introduced a "three strikes" policy for those who share illegal content. If letters fail to stop them, illegal file-sharers risk being disconnected.
And the UK's Digital Economy Bill also seeks to impose technical restrictions, including disconnection, on persistent pirates.
Earlier this month, MEPs agreed on a compromise solution to protect user's rights which read: "A user's internet access may be restricted, if necessary and proportionate, only after a fair and impartial procedure including the user's right to be heard."
What the fair and impartial procedure will mean in practice is, as yet, unclear.
MEPs also agreed that restrictions on a user's internet access can only be taken "with due respect for the principle of presumption of innocence and the right to privacy".
But an earlier amendment which ruled that any application for cutting off internet access must go through a judge was rejected.
Some critics say the compromise is too weak while some lawyers argue that it could put the UK's newly introduced Digital Economy bill at odds with the Telecoms Package.
Meanwhile protests over the UK bill have grown, with 11,000 signing an e-petition against it while others predicted "civil unrest" as a result of the bill.

So UK is the next victim...

[Bodkin]

Its not as bad as it looks for us, Labour will be gone soon, and Rasputin... I mean Mandelson will take this bill with him

[>HyperlogiK<]

This isn't specific to any country or political party, we are all going to be ed sooner or later because the rights holders have no idea what to do about piracy even though a number of possible solutions have been staring them in the face for years.

[naokaji]

Cut off the internet for piracy?

As long as they throttle you for using legit services like bbc iplayer because they are too stupid to tell the difference between legal and illegal traffic it won't ever happen.

[Manabu]

I think those three strikes laws could be funny... at least for who is watching outside. :P

I say that based on things like RIAA being fooled to send infringement notices to an network printer. Hackers can do much more than this with real computers. That besides the massive civil disobedience that may bravely continue even after the law. This madness will have to stop.

[saaya]

so how is it a fair hearing if there is no independent third party, ie a judge, in charge?