XtremeSystems Forums

Go Back   XtremeSystems Forums > Xtreme > Xtreme Overclocking

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 12-13-2006, 12:31 PM   #1
Vapor
Admin
 
Vapor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 11,782
Onepagebook, coolaler and Superpi

First off, in light of TaPaKaH's recent admittance of faking everything, we're not scheming to get anyone, or anything like that. He did on his own. However, let's put that in perspective as well. We were all fooled for MONTHS. That's how possible, legitimate, and prevalent cheating really is....and it's a shame.

In zbogorgon's recent thread: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=125972 , he further elucidates how cheating can be done easily....he's due a lot of credit for coming forward and bringing this up, as well as recognizing where some cheating may exist.

Let's remember one key thing here....the methods that we know exist, speedhack linearly.

Well, SPi doesn't scale linearly, it's inversely proportional. You can't linearly generalize: 100MHz increase is equal to a given time decrease. However, you can say this: MHz * time ~= X, where X is constant for any given setup.

For a high speed, VERY well tweaked 975X + Conroe sytem, X is equal to about 50500.
Remember this.

Let's take a look at some top SPI 1.5 results, taken from hwbot.org and from on the forum.

OPB - 5550 x 8.91 = 49451
(Oct 16) here
OPB - 5567 x 9.16 = 50994 (Oct 10) **
Maxxxpct - 5506 x 9.33 = 51370
Coolaler - 5525 x 9.00 = 49725 Lookie here
TaPaKaH - 5408 x 9.36 = 50619
OPB - 5407 x 9.39 = 50772 (Sept 24) **
Memoryextreme Team - 5348 x 9.44 = 50485
Hipro5 - 5376 x 9.45 = 50803
OPB - 5329 x 9.55 = 50892 (Sept 8) **
ojdr2001 - 5348 x 9.55 = 51073
OPB - 5305 x 9.63 = 51087 (Sept 2) **
KP - 5297 x 9.68 = 51275
Hipro - 5217 x 9.72 = 50709
TaPaKaH - 5208 x 9.78 = 50934
zbogorgon - 5196 x 9.8 = 50920
hipro - 5138 x 9.89 = 50815
Kyosen - 4167 x 12.05 = 50212 Lookie here. FWIW, this is THE BEST clock-for-clock time to be found...that's legit at least
before - 5000 x 10.06 = 50300 Lookie here...look at that RAM speed!
kyosen - 9.937 x 5086 = 50540 Lookie here

See a trend? Known, reputable SuperPi GODS need lowish MHz, insane tweaks, and insane RAM to barely break below 50400.

Let's now take a look at Coolaler's progression, from slowest to fastest:

5200 x 9.72 = 50544 (July 12) here
5300 x 9.64 = 51092 (July 17) here
5396 x 9.485 = 51181 (July 18) here
5409 x 9.484 = 51299 (July 19) here
Now things begin to get funky
5485 x 9.204 = 50484 (July 23) here
5512 x 9.156 = 50468 (July 28) here
Now the grand finale:
5525 x 9.000 = 49725 (Aug 2) here

Not a single one of those final three has outstanding FSB/RAM speed or timings, not a single one has much headroom for MHz suicide stability....and are EXCEEDINGLY fast, especially considering his tweaking skills. Something changed....something we can't see.

Well, let's take a look at his results from above....see clock-for-clock improving over time? Then he drops the bomb: 8.906 at 5550. He also later shares all his tweaks, they're old, they don't do that much (if anything) on C2D, people have tried them. Then, if you also look back at his non-WR results, you see this gem:

4710 x 10.344 = 48720 here
....which is just crazy fast, fast to the point where he probably ran it at a higher speed than what he had in the screenshot.

Anyway, something's up with the orange and red results....they're just not legit. The green results are the best we could find....and are by known SPI legends, and have the hardware setting to backup the clock-for-clock greatness they have.

Looking at the top 250 results between hwbot.org and Coolaler and OPB's posts, and charting them in excel....well, pictures certainly can say a thousand words.



Quick explanation: each point represents a SPI run, look at the axis to tell what each graph is graphing....the "average" line is, based on the top 250 results and their clock-for-clock performance, that is the "average expected performance line". The "ideal" line is based on "50500"....a.k.a., a VERY well-tweaked system, and what you can expect as MHz changes.

Coolalers and OPB's results have been singled out so you can tell which are theirs. Picoo's recent run is also singled out as the new WR, and to show, that what is expected from an insanely tuned system from one of Team Japan's members.

Some sort of explanation is due....either it's a bug, a cheat, or a tweak that does what no other tweak can do in 1M: improve times by more than a few hundreths of a second.
__________________
Current Waterblock Testing
Roundup #2: Overall Comparison Thread, Alphacool Livingstone, Alphacool Niagara, Alphacool Yellowstone, D-Tek Fuzion V2, EK Supreme, EK Supreme LT, Enzotech Sapphire Rev A., Heatkiller 3.0 LC, Heatkiller 3.0 LT, Koolance CPU-345, Koolance CPU-350, Phobya, Swiftech Apogee GTZ, Swiftech Apogee GTZ SE, Swiftech Apogee XT
Vapor is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:37 PM   #2
2fink
Xtreme Cruncher
 
2fink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany, near Stuttgart
Posts: 1,220
Send a message via ICQ to 2fink
edit...
__________________
E2160 @ 360x9, max 390x9 watercooled
GA-P35-DS3
Cellshock D9GMH @ 545mhz cl5-5-5-5-15
Palit 7300gt 500/1000 @ 780/1600 watercooled

Last edited by 2fink; 12-13-2006 at 12:59 PM.
2fink is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:44 PM   #3
alexio
The Blue Dolphin
 
alexio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,006
I see no difference big enough to conclude something is fishy. OPB is a very good tweaker and he could have given his special tweak(s) to Coolaler.

And yes, cheating is possible, but I trust OPB and Coolaler before I see any real prove, which nobody can provide.

It's a matter of trust.
__________________
Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides

Blue Reviews:
Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case


Blue Guides:
Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself


Quote:
98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.
alexio is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:45 PM   #4
LordofDoom
Xtreme Member
 
LordofDoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 452
Send a message via AIM to LordofDoom Send a message via MSN to LordofDoom
Well, everything seems hypothetical. IDK what to think.
__________________
LordofDoom is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:45 PM   #5
M.Beier
"HW addict"
 
M.Beier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,826
Send a message via MSN to M.Beier Send a message via Skype™ to M.Beier
I've spoken about tweaks with coolaler..

- Btw, my results are with lower clocks, but according to ya system, I hit around 49800-50000, does that make me a cheater?
__________________
Competition ranking;
AOCM II 2008: #2(01SE,AM3,8M), AMD-OC 2009 DK: #2(max freq), Gigabyte TweaKING 2009: #4(32M, 01SE)

Highest freq for Ras to CAS; 5(?),7 (1000,1275)



HWB hunt on gfx classics to be initialized soon!
M.Beier is online now  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:47 PM   #6
zakelwe
Xtreme X.I.P.
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2fink
sry, but why get all well respected overclockers flamed like this?

i cant believe everyone is thinking opb and coolaler are cheating! when coolaler first made those records, he was the absolute leader.. no one could beat his times sub 10seconds.. why should he cheat?
he could do a run @ 5ghz (9,8sec) and get the wr, or he could tweak the system as much as possible to show what is possible with the systems we own and make 9sec flat

the tweaks they use may be unfair, because no one else knows them, but team japan also used some tweaks like copying big files on the hdd...
What flame, what cheat accusation ?




All Vapor is saying is that the graphs show that their results are from the norm and therefore whether they are valid ?

We should not put a humanistic spin on things to try and validify things. The pure results speak for themselves.

Regards

Andy
zakelwe is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:49 PM   #7
massman
www.hwbot.org
 
massman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,855
Send a message via MSN to massman
I'm pretty sceptic about this thread. Once again, the people who don't reach great times start to complain about how impossible it is to have such low spi times.

BUT on the other hand, you have prouven a point by showing us the graphs. Before you make your final conclusion, I'd like to hear what the legends have to tell about this
massman is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:51 PM   #8
cronic
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 785
sorry, but I need more than your equation to believe that coolar and OPB have done something Malicious, do they know something you don't, maybe. Not really sure this is the approiate way to go about questioning their results either.
cronic is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:52 PM   #9
Lestat
I am Xtreme
 
Lestat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: SiliCORN Valley
Posts: 4,786
Send a message via AIM to Lestat Send a message via MSN to Lestat
i am not even gunna get into this pi$$ing contest
__________________
no more computer......
Heat Ebay XB360 GamerTag VvvlestatvvV
Lestat is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:52 PM   #10
guess2098
X.I.P
 
guess2098's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,028
if i can run at that speed, i can easy to break their 32M time. believe or not. i have much better tweak XD
__________________
i left gskill about 4 months already.!!! please don't PM me about gskill's product :P but i can still help
guess2098 is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:53 PM   #11
zbogorgon
Slovenian OC Master
 
zbogorgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 1,117
this is a pic of all OPBs Spi sub 10s runs, all done on 975 mobo, with 1:1 3-3-3- RAM settings
some of top runs aren't that far appart

__________________
OC-Lab.si!!
zbogorgon is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:53 PM   #12
alexio
The Blue Dolphin
 
alexio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 3,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by zakelwe
What flame, what cheat accusation ?


************************

All Vapor is saying is that the graphs show that their results are from the norm and therefore whether they are valid ?

We should not put a humanistic spin on things to try and validify things. The pure results speak for themselves.

Regards

Andy
He says they're not legit, in his post. If that isn't an accusation of cheating I don't know what is.
__________________
Blue Dolphin Reviews & Guides

Blue Reviews:
Gigabyte G-Power PRO CPU cooler
Vantec Nexstar 3.5" external HDD enclosure
Gigabyte Poseidon 310 case


Blue Guides:
Fixing a GFX BIOS checksum yourself


Quote:
98% of the internet population has a Myspace. If you're part of the 2% that isn't an emo bastard, copy and paste this into your sig.
alexio is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:54 PM   #13
cadaveca
xtreme member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 4,592
Send a message via Skype™ to cadaveca
woah, boys. this is not about cheating. It's about a new tweak it seems Vapor would like shared with all. BUt:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coolaler
Speical Thanks to my Teammate,OPB's Opinion MSR for editor set
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnePageBook
mate,
For the tweak about explorer.exe shut down is not that nessary for getting faster result; on the other hand, set the real time for 1m is more than anything else!! that my two cents
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coolaler
yes!OPB r right
if u off explore,that will be slower
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
Sorry Coolaler but something is weird in your 9.000s run

Here is your 9.156s score

Between the loop 19 and 20 there is a difference of 0.406s (normal)
Anyway, so, cpulloverclock concedes that result is valid, but still questions. After a PM session he gives up. Why? We wanna know.

Have fun!
cadaveca is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:56 PM   #14
MaSell
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
MaSell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Poland
Posts: 562
So told us thit tweak(s) guys!
__________________




Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreYang View Post
wtf..your cpu is better.
MaSell is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 12:59 PM   #15
massman
www.hwbot.org
 
massman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,855
Send a message via MSN to massman
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vapor
in light of TaPaKaH's recent admittance of faking everything
Where does he say that, in his own words ?

If it's indeed all fake, hwbot will take further actions and delete his scores.
massman is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:00 PM   #16
zakelwe
Xtreme X.I.P.
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by alexio
He says they're not legit, in his post. If that isn't an accusation of cheating I don't know what is.
No, he is saying they are not valid, ie they are not the norm and therefore need further explanation. This has also been raised here


http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=125972

this just adds graphs to show it plainly.

How do you explain those graphs .. a tweak ? Even the Japanese cannot get down to that level and they are the masters of SuperPi.

Regards
Andy
zakelwe is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:00 PM   #17
RyderOCZ
OCZ Memory Guru
 
RyderOCZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 2,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
Where does he say that, in his own words ?
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=126554
__________________
Problems with your OCZ or PCP&C Product? PM or E-mail Me


OCZ and PCP&C Support Forums - Click Here
RyderOCZ is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:00 PM   #18
zbogorgon
Slovenian OC Master
 
zbogorgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 1,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
Where does he say that, in his own words ?

If it's indeed all fake, hwbot will take further actions and delete his scores.
probably over PM, he is Banned on XS
__________________
OC-Lab.si!!
zbogorgon is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:01 PM   #19
Vapor
Admin
 
Vapor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 11,782
Words mean things.

Among the definitions of legitimate: 1) not spurious or unjustified; genuine and 2) in accordance with the laws of reasoning; logically inferable; logical

Does this mean cheating? No. Does it leave out cheating? No.

I'm just saying they're not legitimate.

I have listed my three suspected causes for why some of their results are, statistically, way out of the norm. To the point where not a single other person can, legitimately replicate or nearly replicate these results

These results need an explanation. Can anyone prove the legitimacy of the suspected results?

EDIT: TaPaKaH admitted the cheating here: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...24#post1893424
__________________
Current Waterblock Testing
Roundup #2: Overall Comparison Thread, Alphacool Livingstone, Alphacool Niagara, Alphacool Yellowstone, D-Tek Fuzion V2, EK Supreme, EK Supreme LT, Enzotech Sapphire Rev A., Heatkiller 3.0 LC, Heatkiller 3.0 LT, Koolance CPU-345, Koolance CPU-350, Phobya, Swiftech Apogee GTZ, Swiftech Apogee GTZ SE, Swiftech Apogee XT

Last edited by Vapor; 12-13-2006 at 01:03 PM.
Vapor is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:02 PM   #20
Lithan
Bulletproof
 
Lithan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Shun low, K?
Posts: 3,315
Send a message via AIM to Lithan
Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaveca
woah, boys. this is not about cheating. It's about a new tweak it seems Vapor would like shared with all. BUt:







Anyway, so, cpulloverclock concedes that result is valid, but still questions. After a PM session he gives up. Why? We wanna know.

Have fun!

There has been discussion regarding the Stripped down XP, priority RT, and killing explorer tweaks. From what I understood, those all give very very very minor performance boosts. We are talking multiple hundred mhz discrepancies, as I understand it.

Most glaring even besides the stark difference between these benchies and other Pi'ers benches is the difference between these benchies and the same user's previous benchies. Quite suddenly these benchers shave seconds off their times whereas the visible changes in their rigs don't demonstrate any reason why that should happen.
__________________
Only the stupidest humans believe that the dogma of relative filth is a defense.

Last edited by Lithan; 12-13-2006 at 01:06 PM.
Lithan is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:02 PM   #21
cadaveca
xtreme member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 4,592
Send a message via Skype™ to cadaveca
Quote:
Originally Posted by massman
Where does he say that, in his own words ?

If it's indeed all fake, hwbot will take further actions and delete his scores.
here ya go:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
Can you please ban me?

Reasons:
I`m a big faker
none of my results are true
I have never used any of xtreme cooling (DI/LN2)
sitting @ my PII-233 box
I hate XS
the member they talk about here http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=117280&page=3 is me

ATM I report that` I`m not mad at someone, not drunk, wasn`t hit on the street by the brick

That`s just my will.
I do not want to be an XS member anymore...

Thanks
Sam

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&highlight=ban



BTW...TaPaKaH = HaKa PaT = Hacker Pat.
cadaveca is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:03 PM   #22
^don.k's^
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Spain
Posts: 737
Quote:
Originally Posted by M.Beier
I've spoken about tweaks with coolaler..

- Btw, my results are with lower clocks, but according to ya system, I hit around 49800-50000, does that make me a cheater?
Lower clocks makes that number lower, right ? Or is it linear @whatever clocks ?

Something to see this easy is to make at low speeds so everyone can make the tests.

@3500mhz I got 14,297secs with fat body @583 4-3-2-1 ( 2x512 ) which gaves me a nice ~50000 points. I know that it could be a bit better, not too much tho.

OPB made a run of 14,15secs @3,5ghz with 440 3-3-3 ram ( 2x1gb )

That made me think of it... Also one user which gets 14,25secs with an gigabyte 965p and ram similar to OPB.

What do you say ?
__________________
Asus P5K Premium//Intel E6600@3,6ghz//Corsair PC6400C3@500 4-4-4-12 2,2v//8800GTS G92//Audigy 2 ZS//SeaSonic M12 700W & LianLi V2000B
^don.k's^ is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:05 PM   #23
cadaveca
xtreme member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 4,592
Send a message via Skype™ to cadaveca
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lithan
There has been discussion regarding the Stripped down XP, priority RT, and killing explorer tweaks. From what I understood, those all give very very very minor performance boosts. We are talking multiple second discrepancies, as I understand it.
hey man, when i posted 8 second spi times i got grilled too. i thought result was legit, and can still to this day replicate it(hardware conflict with RAID drive without it's partner throws off hardware timer) on 3ghz Opty 148.


I found out why my result is borked, i wanna hear how this was done too. Don't get me wrong, I popped up relevant info because i have been following this for a while. Notice how my HWBOT has no SPI runs? i don't bother becasue those scores seem wrong to me too, and noone says nothing.
cadaveca is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:07 PM   #24
[XC] moddolicous
XS_THE_MACHINE
 
[XC] moddolicous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Long Island
Posts: 4,984
Send a message via AIM to [XC] moddolicous
OPB abnd Coolaler are well respected overclockers. They are probably aware of tweaks that we arent. One tweak that seems to affect SPI times is msconfig's maxmem tweak. There has been many different opinion on what it should be. What if OPB and Coolaler have found the sweet spot? Also, I beleive after 2 runs of SPI you get a faster time (something to do with the files or so). Those are only a few. It could very well be a bug, but it will take a confession from them both for me to beleive that they cheated. No one else will convince me.
__________________
"Victory is always possible for the person who refuses to stop fighting"

clicks to save kids
[XC] moddolicous is offline  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:09 PM   #25
zbogorgon
Slovenian OC Master
 
zbogorgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 1,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by PallMall
the only thing i can think about explaining OPB run is the systems stability at that point.

I think everyone can produce the same output ,

bench at max cpu speed, let it error, bench again little less, bench again at max cpu speed, again less.

There should be noticable changes no ?
the only thing i came accross is you Spi time is way longer, i had at ~4000GHz C2D spi 1m ~22s, never noticed insanelly fast time due to instability
__________________
OC-Lab.si!!
zbogorgon is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
XtremeSystems