MMM
Page 30 of 100 FirstFirst ... 20272829303132334080 ... LastLast
Results 726 to 750 of 3051

Thread: The Fermi Thread - Part 3

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by Chickenfeed View Post
    If it is true at anything less than 1920x1200 8xAA very high settings, I'll be impressed. Otherwise
    Exactly.
    Hope this is true, though, would be worth the wait and increased power consumption at least.
    Quote Originally Posted by Chumbucket843 View Post
    since when did all of the 200 series reach eol?
    A few months ago or so...
    Quote Originally Posted by alcachofa View Post
    Definitely, but there is an exception with NV cards : 3D Vision.
    ATI has this as well.
    Quote Originally Posted by mindfury View Post
    GTX480 machine power consumption at full load is nearly 130W more than HD5870 machine,full load temperature is 92℃.

    I don't care much about extra 130W, but another melting card after my 8800 Ultra... No, thanks.
    Quote Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD View Post
    "Delta electronics inc" says it all. Performance before silence.

    This fan has to be very loud at 100% I bet (knowing Delta this will probably run up to like 5500rpm if it is 70/72mm or whatever), maybe closed headphones starts becoming a recommendation soon. Luckily Delta fans usually scale well noise wise if you lower speeds and they have a tendency to last like forever.
    5870's fan @ 100% is crazy, also, though.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    saaya: I think you missed that the guy reported %10 better perf. in Crysis of 470, not 480...

    However, this still might be the 2560 + 4xAA case which says little...
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    saaya: I think you missed that the guy reported %10 better perf. in Crysis of 470, not 480...

    However, this still might be the 2560 + 4xAA case which says little...
    agree, I guess the 5870 1g must be included for the bench, instead of 2gb version. In high setting like 2506x1600 in crysis, 1g version is easy to use out of the buffer.

  4. #4
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    saaya: I think you missed that the guy reported %10 better perf. in Crysis of 470, not 480...
    However, this still might be the 2560 + 4xAA case which says little...
    no, i didnt miss that...
    but whats the difference between a 5870, 5850, gtx470 and gtx480?
    unless you play at super high res you wouldnt be able to tell them apart by playing games on those rigs... same res, same aa, roughly same fps and min fps...

    so one card is 5% faster here, another 10% there... that doesnt really make a difference, does it? i hope reviews will have oced vs oced comparisons as well, that would be interesting... especially for the 470...

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Miltown, Wisconsin
    Posts
    353
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    no, i didnt miss that...
    but whats the difference between a 5870, 5850, gtx470 and gtx480?
    unless you play at super high res you wouldnt be able to tell them apart by playing games on those rigs... same res, same aa, roughly same fps and min fps...

    Just ask my wife what a inch or two of e-peen can do. Its all about girth.. sorry, I mean bandwith.

    Honestly, its all about the same with these new cards. Whatever works for your res is the best choice. My 5850 maxes out almost everything but crysis at 1080p. I cant really ask for much more for just gaming. I think it was one of the best purchases I have ever made. I would wait till a fermi refresh honestly, this first batch looks horrid. I predict a fermi refresh asap, fermi just isnt profitable in its current state.

    I have a hard time spending more than 250$ on a piece of hardware I know is going to be outdated and worthless in 6 months. I am way happier spending less and upgrading more often.
    Pc gaming is dying fast, the consoles and ports rule the market. ACCEPT IT
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    WARNING GTX480 - may cause dizziness, blurred vision, dry mouth, dehydration, shortness of breath, headaches, naussea, explosive diahrea


    Foxconn Bloodrage P11 ( 2.1 SLIC MOD )
    Corei7 980 (3118B583) 4.2ghz 24-7 with stock vcore
    2x8GB PNY 1600c9 @ 1600mhz 9-9-9-24-1T
    nVidia GTX 770
    256gb OCZ Vertex4 FW 1.5
    2TB Green Barracuda
    Antec HCG-620w PSU
    Corsair H50 ( Sucks Hairry Balls IMHO )
    Coolermaster Storm Sniper Black Custom Sleeved
    3 x Dell U2410 H-IPS 1920x1200 Surround
    Windows 7 x64 Ultimate




  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    23
    must be the most power hungry config. ever...


  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    we might see 90 pages before the 6th of april LOLL

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wm@n View Post
    we might see 90 pages before the 6th of april LOLL
    yeah but at least reviewers have the cards now, any info leaking should be close to correct
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by annihilat0r View Post
    yeah but at least reviewers have the cards now, any info leaking should be close to correct

    indeed..... we should prepare the anti depression med for the nvidia fanboys .....

  10. #10
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    It's like only 3 days left (it's past midnight here) and there's no comprehensive leaked stuff, yea the most important specs are revealed but nothing besides this, no trustworthy benchmarks etc. I must say this is very impressively kept secret. GT200 was kept quite secret until like a week beforehand, things started leaking out, benchmarks etc but even 3 days before fermi stuff is meant to be released no signs of real benchmarks etc. Congrats nvidia to this if nothing else.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    336
    Quote Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD View Post
    It's like only 3 days left (it's past midnight here) and there's no comprehensive leaked stuff, yea the most important specs are revealed but nothing besides this, no trustworthy benchmarks etc. I must say this is very impressively kept secret. GT200 was kept quite secret until like a week beforehand, things started leaking out, benchmarks etc but even 3 days before fermi stuff is meant to be released no signs of real benchmarks etc. Congrats nvidia to this if nothing else.
    that's probably because no one is excited about the performance

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Your spouse/chiropractor laughed at you when you spent $400 on it.. now who's laughing!
    1500W. Let that sink in.

    mobo = 6pin = 75W, 8pin = 150W.
    GTX480 = mobo + 6pin + 8pin = 300W max
    GTX460 = mobo + 6pin + 6pin = 225W max

    For 3x SLI need: 6 PCIE connectors, and 675-900W for video cards alone.
    There are about a dozen 1100-1200W PSU on the market - which suddenly dont look so excessive. But most only have enough 6/8 pin PCIE connectors for 2 x GTX480 or 3x GTX470.

    Newegg has three PSU with 8 PCIE connectors, and one amazing PSU has 4x 6pin, 4x 8pin . Sadly Antec only has 1200W - hardly enough for OC CPU AND Triple or Quad SLI.

    PS: If they add even metal bars/rods along top of heatsink, it will leave the same marks as grill on your hamburgers

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  13. #13
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    since when did all of the 200 series reach eol?

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by Chumbucket843 View Post
    since when did all of the 200 series reach eol?
    They've been EOL for quite a while now, try to find a GTX 275 in stores...

    the only one left is the 285 for a ridiculous $375 which is close to the 5870. How much longer do we have to wait!!?!?!?!?

    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    5 price brackets. 2 years. 5 products. 1 chip = whole lotta slackers
    Don't forget about the G92 which is still goin strong in the low end, but can't really compete with ATI anymore in price. I think the G92 will never go EOL...just keep puttin them out

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by weston View Post
    They've been EOL for quite a while now, try to find a GTX 275 in stores...

    the only one left is the 285 for a ridiculous $375 which is close to the 5870. How much longer do we have to wait!!?!?!?!?



    Don't forget about the G92 which is still goin strong in the low end, but can't really compete with ATI anymore in price. I think the G92 will never go EOL...just keep puttin them out
    I can only think of 9, maybe 11 G92 products... (GT330 is probably that 40nm chip)
    Code:
    	The Life of Jeremy Bentham 	
    Nov-10	8800 GT	
    Dec-07	8800 GTS 512MB	
    Jan-08	8800 GS	
    Mar-08	9800GX2	
    Apr-08	9800 GTX	
    May-08	9600 GSO	
    Jul-08	9800 GTX+	9800 GT
    Mar-09	GTS150	GTS250
    Feb-10	GT330?
    April 2010 - the all new, super uber cool, GTS450 (Iron Man2 edition) - c'mon nVidia, no need to hide those PR slides, we ALL knew another G92 was coming.

    We all had a good ride.. now its time to take old Yeller out back with the shotgun. Common, old boy, dont stare at me with those big round puppy eyes - ugh I cant do it - ok ok this is last and final year, I promise

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    I can only think of 9, maybe 11 G92 products... (GT330 is probably that 40nm chip)
    Code:
    	The Life of Jeremy Bentham 	
    Nov-10	8800 GT	
    Dec-07	8800 GTS 512MB	
    Jan-08	8800 GS	
    Mar-08	9800GX2	
    Apr-08	9800 GTX	
    May-08	9600 GSO	
    Jul-08	9800 GTX+	9800 GT
    Mar-09	GTS150	GTS250
    Feb-10	GT330?
    April 2010 - the all new, super uber cool, GTS450 (Iron Man2 edition) - c'mon nVidia, no need to hide those PR slides, we ALL knew another G92 was coming.

    We all had a good ride.. now its time to take old Yeller out back with the shotgun. Common, old boy, dont stare at me with those big round puppy eyes - ugh I cant do it - ok ok this is last and final year, I promise
    LOL you are a shining light of humor in this endlessly repetitive thread! keep it up

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    I can only think of 9, maybe 11 G92 products... (GT330 is probably that 40nm chip)
    Code:
    	The Life of Jeremy Bentham 	
    Nov-10	8800 GT	
    Dec-07	8800 GTS 512MB	
    Jan-08	8800 GS	
    Mar-08	9800GX2	
    Apr-08	9800 GTX	
    May-08	9600 GSO	
    Jul-08	9800 GTX+	9800 GT
    Mar-09	GTS150	GTS250
    Feb-10	GT330?
    April 2010 - the all new, super uber cool, GTS450 (Iron Man2 edition) - c'mon nVidia, no need to hide those PR slides, we ALL knew another G92 was coming.

    We all had a good ride.. now its time to take old Yeller out back with the shotgun. Common, old boy, dont stare at me with those big round puppy eyes - ugh I cant do it - ok ok this is last and final year, I promise

    LOL and another good ol rebrand demanded by the oem ..... sure ... ty nvidia .... ty

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    I can only think of 9, maybe 11 G92 products... (GT330 is probably that 40nm chip)
    Code:
    	The Life of Jeremy Bentham 	
    Nov-10	8800 GT	
    Dec-07	8800 GTS 512MB	
    Jan-08	8800 GS	
    Mar-08	9800GX2	
    Apr-08	9800 GTX	
    May-08	9600 GSO	
    Jul-08	9800 GTX+	9800 GT
    Mar-09	GTS150	GTS250
    Feb-10	GT330?
    April 2010 - the all new, super uber cool, GTS450 (Iron Man2 edition) - c'mon nVidia, no need to hide those PR slides, we ALL knew another G92 was coming.

    We all had a good ride.. now its time to take old Yeller out back with the shotgun. Common, old boy, dont stare at me with those big round puppy eyes - ugh I cant do it - ok ok this is last and final year, I promise
    LOL. 9600 GSO had two versions that were fairly different products as well: a 96sp version with 192/384-bit bus width based on 384mb or 768mb of RAM, and a 48sp version with 256-bit bus.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    Your posts are (in general) good reads Deimos. Either full of information, full of teh lolz (not in a negative way!) or both
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  20. #20
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    You're missing the overall point - which is what many people do when they are backed into the corner by a sound argument supported by facts.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    well if deimos could clarify his original point that would help. are you talking about rebrands or just different sku's based off of g92? there is a difference all you have to do is look

    9800gtx

    gt330

    g92 was a great architecture, nvidia just cant get enough of it, the consumers might have a different opinion.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    1,313
    Quote Originally Posted by Chumbucket843 View Post
    well if deimos could clarify his original point that would help. are you talking about rebrands or just different sku's based off of g92? there is a difference all you have to do is look
    I think the pattern is fairly obvious. All except probaby GT330, use "G92 and/or G92b".. ie the same chip.

    Is 8800GS a rebrand? 9800GX2? I guess you could say GTS250 is a rebrand, but it has different PCB, memory, heatsink. box!! etc.

    =============

    G200 eol a good thing?
    Imagine you bought a GTX275 or worse, a GTX295 yesterday. Week later, your "investment" resembles those GM stocks you thought would be a good idea.

    ============

    Those arguing not to worry if nVidia loses money on GTX470.
    So how do they recuperate several $100m of R&D expense?
    Uber super cool and brand new DX10 G92 products?
    Those high margin non-existent DX11 cards that haven't launched?
    Perhaps the millions of Tesla products you see every teen in school buying?

    What is my point?

    GTX 280 launced with MSRP of $650. Because of AMD's 4870, it was reduced a week later to $500. Lets pretend board has fixed cost of $300. That's difference of $350 vs $200 for profit... or almost half as much.

    Fastforward a 2 years later, and nVidia is still hasn't learned. Boards and chips are bigger, hotter and more expensive to make.

    Everything else being equal, consumers would probably buy:
    - cooler/lower-power product
    - higher performance
    - nVidia if it still represents great brand name image - questionable?

    So, you can't just say 10% higher performance, so we'll make MSRP 10% higher - need to factor in cons of power/heat/availability. Things would be rosy if a 384 bit board, 50% more DRAM chips, and 50% bigger die with low yields only added 10% more to costs. Very likely a lot lot more.

    With 0 competition, AMD has sold millions of DX11 products and made mucho $$$. nVidia is at $0.00
    And, people who already own a DX11 card, are unlikely to "upgrade".

    So, just like AMD with Phenom(1), how do you sell the product?:
    - lower price? -> temporary gain in marketshare at expense of less profits.
    - lower power? -> trouble enough as it is getting working dies
    - higher clocks? -> power is already very high
    - lower costs? -> would you buy more expensive 768MB card? What if "some assembly required"?
    - PhysX marketing? -> trouble is, its nothing new since all GF8/9/200 have it.
    - DX11 promotion? -> sucks you spent last 6 months saying its not a big deal.
    - CUDA GPGPU apps? -> its nice bonus. People don't buy $500 video cards to accelerate their Adobe PDF Reader.
    - EyeInfinity? -> Don't got none.

    The desperate "solution" is the same as it was in fx era... its the only thing you can really change...
    questionable driver optimizations at the expense of rendering quality and driver stability.

    Ofcourse like G80, about a year later they're gonna have a 32/28nm 448SP 256bit 1GB GDDR5 board. They're gonna call it "480GT"
    Last edited by ***Deimos***; 03-22-2010 at 07:40 PM.

    24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
    1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
    Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
    XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
    Fastforward a 2 years later, and nVidia is still hasn't learned. Boards and chips are bigger, hotter and more expensive to make.
    How is this different from ATI when compared to their previous gen, the boards and chips are bigger, hotter and of course more expensive to make as well.


    With 0 competition, AMD has sold millions of DX11 products and made mucho $$$. nVidia is at $0.00 And, people who already own a DX11 card, are unlikely to "upgrade".
    As far as dx11 sure but obviously with the inventory shortages at etailers that is a clear indicator nvidia have managed to sell off inventory easily even in light of ATI's dx11 & performance advantage.

    I think you're blowing the desperation of the market out of proportion, graphics cards don't sell to the masses like iphones or something. Just because DX11 or newer faster hardware is released the majority of users aren't running out and buying new hardware simply because there is new hardware released, not everybody lives on the bleeding edge of tech.

    And if you're worried that the card you bought today may be obsolete a month later when a new model comes out well you need a new hobby. We all know there is new hardware always around the corner and if you don't time your purchase early in the cycle your hardware will be superseded sooner or possibly the same day you make your purchase.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    476
    500$ for GTX 480 with 8% more HP and a bunch more watts over a 400$ 5870 which will drop in price when GTX480 comes out. I don't know guys,I know i will wait a little before I dump my cash...
    i9 9900K/1080 Ti

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    canada
    Posts
    1,886
    G92 will never die ....

Page 30 of 100 FirstFirst ... 20272829303132334080 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •