Post your Cinebench 10 results

[Rol-Co]

Got it at 235 here chri$h , you get a nice memspeed with that and bring back the i7 performance ,
notish that running gulftown the nb getting much hotter, you have the same issue ?

[Florinmocanu]

Frankly, i hate the unreliability of Cinebench R10 to properly show the performance of the CPU.

I ran the test 10-12 times in a row and look what results i got. Totally wack. The error margin is way to big in my opinion.

I can find an almost 800 points difference between 2 results ran at exactly the same settings and same load, i didn't touch the PC while running each of the tests.

Forgot to put a CPU-Z in there, i was running the 920 at 3.486ghz, DDR3 running at 1660, CL9 (OC from 1333)

[Rol-Co]

Thats not cinebench but unstable system or trottling cpu .

[Movieman]

Originally Posted by Rol-Co

Thats not cinebench but unstable system or trottling cpu .

Yea, mine always stay with a very few points..

[Florinmocanu]

No, it's not an unstable system. I ran 4 hours of prime 95, a 12 hour 3dsmax mental ray rendering and lots of benches, never did it even hick-up on me.

My temps never go above 67-68 in full load, even in prime 95, so no throttling because of bad cooling (mugen2 with 2 enermax magma in push/pull, good case airflow as well, CM690 as case, good PSU as well).
Usually, the load temps in normal applications are like 58-60.
It's the software, not the system.

Plus, i personally made a 3dsmax test scene, which i use to bench cpus, renders with Mental Ray.

Ran it 4 times at the exact same setup and clocks, the results were 10min29sec, 10min32sec, 10min33sec, 10min33sec.

So pretty much it gave me really stable results, not having huge error margins. While cinebench, well, you can look in the screenshot for what it does.

[jcool]

He's right guys.. CB10 gives different results every time you run it. That's why you gotta run 10-20x to get a good score.