XtremeSystems Forums

Go Back   XtremeSystems Forums > Hardware > ATI

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 09-23-2009, 05:21 AM   #1876
xXxDieselxXx
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 160
5870! 5870! What about the little brother 5850?

Any new 5850 reviews? I would love to see how this card performs.
__________________
CPU: i7-860 @4GHZ
Mobo: eVGA P55-FTW
RAM: 4Gigs G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 2000 (PC3 16000)
Cooler: CORSAIR H50 (Water)
PSU: Antec TruePower TP-750 750W
GPU: XFX 5850 Unlocked @ 950x1170 1.2v
Case: Cooler Master HAF-932
xXxDieselxXx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 05:22 AM   #1877
ghost_recon88
Xtreme Member
 
ghost_recon88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
Did any one see a 5870 CF review with a P55???

ANyone



5870 ~ 4870 x2. If one had a 295, 5870 may not be much of a upgrade but 5870 x2 would certainly be one.
Check this review in a few days
__________________
pauld5999 - "0-60 in my civic feels like an AMD pi run"

Intel E5200 @ 3.4GHz | GA-G41M-ES2L | 2GB DDR2-667

Heatware
ghost_recon88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 05:39 AM   #1878
dctokyo
Xtreme Member
 
dctokyo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 275
no mention of this card in Japan yet
__________________
Motherboard: ASUS Rampage Extreme//Processor:E8600 //Cooling:Corsair CWCH50-1//Memory:Patriot DDR3 PVS34G1600LLK 8GB//Video Card: Sapphire VAPOR-X HD 4890 OC Edition //HDD/Intel X25-M G2 80 GB & WD 74 GB VelociRaptor//Sound Card & Nic Card: PCI-e X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty/EVGA Killer Xeno Pro //Case:SilverStone Raven RV02//Power Supply: Corsair HX 850 //Monitor:Samsung P2770H 27"
dctokyo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 05:44 AM   #1879
largon
Xtreme Guru
 
largon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Suomi Finland
Posts: 3,872
TPU review has simulated 5850 results via disabled shaders + 5850 reference clocks forced on 5870. Conclusion: 5850 is 10-15% slower than 5870.
__________________
You were not supposed to see this.
largon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 06:19 AM   #1880
Gaul
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: IND
Posts: 362
well still wait for 5850.....i think best bang.......
Gaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 06:34 AM   #1881
jaredpace
I am Xtreme
 
jaredpace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredpace View Post
I don't think an HD5870 is going to be faster than a GTX295 on average - perhaps only in a few instances. Computerbase.de has some average performance ratings of the cards relative to the GTX295 based on averages from all the listed benchmarks. I expect 5870 to be 95-98% and 5850 to be 80-85% of a GTX295's overall performance (at this resolution)

Source:
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/h...ting_qualitaet
Heheh, I was close :



http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/h...ting_qualitaet

I bet we can reach 95% by cat 9.12.... lets go ATi!!

edit: It's more impressive with 8xAA:



__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreYang View Post
Damn...Today is 11/06, but [his] bios date is 11/07........lol

Last edited by jaredpace; 09-23-2009 at 08:40 AM.
jaredpace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 08:10 AM   #1882
Helloworld_98
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 526
looks like dual 50's will be the top deal for the generation yet again.
Helloworld_98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 08:12 AM   #1883
lunat!c#
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 21
I'm still wondering if it is wise to upgrade my current GPU (4870 1GB) to a 5870 1GB. I play at 1080p, and personally don't really see that much of a difference between 4x AA and 8x AA (or more). Same as with more than 8x AF. I guess a 5870 2GB would probably be better choice, since I run out of VRAM at times.

From a casual-bencher POV, would it be wise to upgrade?
__________________
||
lunat!c# is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 08:28 AM   #1884
oc550be
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by lunat!c# View Post
I'm still wondering if it is wise to upgrade my current GPU (4870 1GB) to a 5870 1GB. I play at 1080p, and personally don't really see that much of a difference between 4x AA and 8x AA (or more). Same as with more than 8x AF. I guess a 5870 2GB would probably be better choice, since I run out of VRAM at times.

From a casual-bencher POV, would it be wise to upgrade?
I'll definetlly buy another 4870 1GB (they very cheap now)...

2*4870 1GB are quite good in 1080p....
oc550be is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 08:56 AM   #1885
ViRuS2k
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 96
My 2x 5870s will be with me tommorow, they have been shipped from OCUK thismorning cant wait.
__________________
Intel I7 2.66ghz @4.2Ghz 1.296v HT-Enabled | Biostar Tpower X58 DDR3 | 3x2 Ocz Blades 2000Mhz 9.9.9.30 @1600mhz 7.7.7.24.6.12.6.6.52 1.64v | PC-Power & Cooling 910w *75a* Single Rail Monster | Azuntech XFI Prelude 7.1 | 24" NeC MultiSync 24WMGX3 1920x1200 60hz | Sennhizer HD650 Headset | Various HDDs 5+ Terabyte | ThermalRight 120 Heatsink Push/Pull Config | 2x Sapphire 5870s X-Fire @1001/1301 *Stock Cooling* | LG Bluray Drive/Writer |
ViRuS2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 09:09 AM   #1886
btarunr
Registered User
 
btarunr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 40
Send a message via AIM to btarunr
Wanna soft-voltmod your HD 57x0/58x0? http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads...r_HD_5870.html
__________________
btarunr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 09:21 AM   #1887
***Deimos***
Xtreme Addict
 
***Deimos***'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,237
Is HD5870 bandwidth starved..? these games where 4870x2 is faster suggest so:
FO3 82.5 72.3 14%
FC2 75.6 66.5 14%
RE5 124.9 98.9 25%
BAT 131.9 108.2 22%
HAWX 105 74 42%
5870 is double everything, so just as 4870x2, although not handicapped by lower 750Mhz and CF efficiency. Only explanation is x2s 230GB/s vs 153GB/s bandwidth.

Solution? 6Ghz GDDR5 chips would provide 184GB/s - that extra 20% should close gap. However, to get 230GB/s would require 7.5Ghz GDDR5... AMD probably left room for the 5890!

-------------

It is very very doubtfull that nVidia would go from 384 GDDR3 -> 512 GDDR3 -> 256 GDDR5 and end up with similar bandwidth limit issues and thus barely faster than GTX285. Highest GDDR5 chips in spring 2009 (when first cards fabbed), are 6-7Gb/s from Samsung. Thus, both nVidia and AMD probably have either 384 (1.5GB) or 512bit (2GB) parts by early spring '10!!
__________________

24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V
***Deimos*** is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 09:24 AM   #1888
Andrea deluxe
Xtreme Member
 
Andrea deluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Italia-Abruzzo
Posts: 309
__________________
[My RIG Spec.][My CPU OC][My RIG Photo][My Desk]
Andrea deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 09:29 AM   #1889
HuffPCair
Xtreme Cruncher
 
HuffPCair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 1,527
Send a message via Yahoo to HuffPCair Send a message via Skype™ to HuffPCair
That thing looks great I think. Is that the 5850 or 5870?
__________________
Cooler Master ATCS 840 (black)
Q66 w/ Corsair H50 on a eVGA 680i SLI
Ballistix DDR2 800
9800GTX+
Corsair 850HX
HDD= 500GB(OS) 1TB(Storage)
Razer Tarantula & Deathadder
Acer 19" & 23" LCD
HuffPCair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 09:29 AM   #1890
Andrea deluxe
Xtreme Member
 
Andrea deluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Italia-Abruzzo
Posts: 309
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuffPCair View Post
That thing looks great I think. Is that the 5850 or 5870?
5870 reference 1gb with vapor x
__________________
[My RIG Spec.][My CPU OC][My RIG Photo][My Desk]
Andrea deluxe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 09:38 AM   #1891
chispy
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
chispy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 568
Send a message via MSN to chispy
They are back in stock at Tigerdirect.com .
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickshih View Post
but the chip should like higher voltage , or LHE is useless....


chispy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 09:57 AM   #1892
BenchZowner
One-Eyed Killing Machine
 
BenchZowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In an idiot-free environment
Posts: 5,030
Send a message via ICQ to BenchZowner Send a message via AIM to BenchZowner Send a message via MSN to BenchZowner Send a message via Skype™ to BenchZowner
Quote:
Originally Posted by ***Deimos*** View Post
Is HD5870 bandwidth starved..? these games where 4870x2 is faster suggest so:
FO3 82.5 72.3 14%
FC2 75.6 66.5 14%
RE5 124.9 98.9 25%
BAT 131.9 108.2 22%
HAWX 105 74 42%
5870 is double everything, so just as 4870x2, although not handicapped by lower 750Mhz and CF efficiency. Only explanation is x2s 230GB/s vs 153GB/s bandwidth.
No, it's not.

And SLI / CF is like running the framebuffers ( GPU Memory ) in RAID 1 ( Mirroring ), not RAID 0 ( Striping ).
Meaning, the effective bandwidth in dual-GPU cards is the same as a single-GPU card using the same core.

The 4870X2 has 115Gbps not 230Gbps memory bandwidth.
__________________
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Oliver Baltuch, Steffen Eisentein

ASUS CAN LICK MY COJONES
BenchZowner is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 10:06 AM   #1893
rkgriffin
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by chispy View Post
They are back in stock at Tigerdirect.com .
TigerDirect says "pre-order". Did they say "in stock" for you? I did place an order for the Asus 5870 for $391 shipped with $40 Bing Cash Back. I can deal with $350 all said and done. Hope it ships soon. Way cheaper than NewEgg for me since I live in Cali.

I really only needed a 5850 since I game at 1920x1200 but with the 5850 priced at $259 I hope the 5870 is worth the extra $90.

Last edited by rkgriffin; 09-23-2009 at 10:21 AM.
rkgriffin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 10:45 AM   #1894
Jamesrt2004
Xtreme Mentor
 
Jamesrt2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 3,029
Send a message via MSN to Jamesrt2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViRuS2k View Post
My 2x 5870s will be with me tommorow, they have been shipped from OCUK thismorning cant wait.
see told people they had them instock.. they just ran out insanley fast! congrats
__________________
"Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
//James
Jamesrt2004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:06 PM   #1895
zalbard
Xtreme Mentor
 
zalbard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Russia (for now)
Posts: 3,173
Send a message via MSN to zalbard
http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/15653/1/
Check these! 1050 Mhz core easily. 58x0 should be great for OCing!
__________________
Donate to XS forums
>> Join Intel 4.5GHz LinX Stable Club <<


Looking for Gulftown / Westmere ES
zalbard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:07 PM   #1896
***Deimos***
Xtreme Addict
 
***Deimos***'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner View Post
No, it's not.

And SLI / CF is like running the framebuffers ( GPU Memory ) in RAID 1 ( Mirroring ), not RAID 0 ( Striping ).
Meaning, the effective bandwidth in dual-GPU cards is the same as a single-GPU card using the same core.

The 4870X2 has 115Gbps not 230Gbps memory bandwidth.
4870x2 = 5870
5870 is like two 4870 cores.
(if we don't agree on this, then we need to take it up with AMD presentation slides).

4870x2 is 750Mhz, and CF CPU overhead and inefficiency
5870 is 850Mhz + IPC efficiency improvements.

How else do you explain 4870x2 being faster by up to 45%?? [EDIT: typo... its 42%] Magic?
BTW: 230GB/s vs 153GB/s = 49% more - coincidence?

The only other explanation is that 5870 uses different code path than R7, and is so poorly hashed together. But, if that was the case, 5870 wouldn't be faster than 4870x2 in other games (where 850Mhz 1600 SP is more influencial than 153GB bandwidth).

[EDIT2:
I also noticed GDDR5 can't be overclocked past 1300Mhz (8%).. even though volt-mod allows 1000Mhz+ (20%+) on the GPU, the performance improves only slightly corresponding to slight memory speed bump - I'd personally wait until they have cards with Samsung 6Gb/s or even 7Gb/s chips or the inevitable 5890 that will be released to spoil GT300 launch]
__________________

24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V

Last edited by ***Deimos***; 09-23-2009 at 12:17 PM.
***Deimos*** is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:08 PM   #1897
Soultaker52
Xtreme Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bel Air, Maryland
Posts: 111
Broke down and finally bought an xfx one from http://linkecomputer.com/ but I didn't realize until after that they are hk based. Here's to hoping I don't get screwed, lol.
__________________
Intel Q6600 G0 with Corsair H50 @ (376x9) 3.38ghz
Asus P5K-E/WiFi-AP
G.Skill 4x2gb PI-BLACK @ 902 4-4-4-12 1.9v
XFX 5870 @ 1000/1300 1.225v *still testing* 9800GT dedicated physx
Corsair TX750W
Razer Lachesis w/ Razer Pro|Pad
1x160gb Seagate HDD, 2x1tb Seagate HDD
LG 22" 226WTQ & BenQ G2400WD
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 build 7600
Soultaker52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:17 PM   #1898
GLENBOY
Xtreme Enthusiast
 
GLENBOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 656
the 5850's look interesting, according to fud they overclock to the same levels as their big brother,wonder if the disabled shaders will be able to be unlocked at some future point like on the old ati 850's
__________________





Last edited by GLENBOY; 09-23-2009 at 12:59 PM.
GLENBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 12:28 PM   #1899
Sadasius
Tygon Warrior
 
Sadasius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,909
Asus looks like the ideal maker so far. C'mon Hemlock! How long are these 5870's anyway? They look long enough.

***EDIT*** Never mind...Found it....28cm or 11 inches according to one review. Damn that is long. That was exactly how much space I had. Damn I hope Hemlock is not any longer.
__________________


San Ace Awesomeness!
San Ace Awesomeness Part II!

If you cannot handle the truth DO NOT click--> this link!!!

Last edited by Sadasius; 09-23-2009 at 12:46 PM.
Sadasius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2009, 01:05 PM   #1900
RaZz!
Xtreme Addict
 
RaZz!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,750
ya, i just checked my case as well and even my 4850 blocks one slot of the hdd cage. if i remember the length of the 4850 correctly the 5870 is as much as 5cm longer! bad thing is, due to the 5870's dualslot cooler one free hdd cage slot isn't enough to fit the card in my case... since the hdd cage has 4 slots from which i use 3 a 5870 won't fit until i remove one hdd from my pc now that sux
__________________
1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 @690/1093 MHz / WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 Surround Speaker // SysProfile


2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Hitachi Deskstar 40GB, 2x Seagate Medalist 10GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W

Server: MSI K7T266 Pro2-R / AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @~1666 MHz (12,5x133,3) / 2x256 MB Kingston PC2300, 2.0-3-3-6 / PixelView GeForce FX 5900XT / WD Caviar 160GB + Seagate 80GB
RaZz! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
XtremeSystems