 |
|
09-23-2009, 05:21 AM
|
#1876
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 160
|
5870! 5870! What about the little brother 5850?
Any new 5850 reviews? I would love to see how this card performs.
__________________
CPU: i7-860 @4GHZ
Mobo: eVGA P55-FTW
RAM: 4Gigs G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 2000 (PC3 16000)
Cooler: CORSAIR H50 (Water)
PSU: Antec TruePower TP-750 750W
GPU: XFX 5850 Unlocked @ 950x1170 1.2v
Case: Cooler Master HAF-932
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 05:22 AM
|
#1877
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajaidev
Did any one see a 5870 CF review with a P55???
ANyone
5870 ~ 4870 x2. If one had a 295, 5870 may not be much of a upgrade but 5870 x2 would certainly be one.
|
Check this review in a few days
__________________
pauld5999 - "0-60 in my civic feels like an AMD pi run"
Intel E5200 @ 3.4GHz | GA-G41M-ES2L | 2GB DDR2-667
Heatware
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 05:39 AM
|
#1878
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 275
|
 no mention of this card in Japan yet
__________________
Motherboard: ASUS Rampage Extreme//Processor:E8600 //Cooling:Corsair CWCH50-1//Memory:Patriot DDR3 PVS34G1600LLK 8GB//Video Card: Sapphire VAPOR-X HD 4890 OC Edition //HDD/Intel X25-M G2 80 GB & WD 74 GB VelociRaptor//Sound Card & Nic Card: PCI-e X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty/EVGA Killer Xeno Pro //Case:SilverStone Raven RV02//Power Supply: Corsair HX 850 //Monitor:Samsung P2770H 27"
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 05:44 AM
|
#1879
|
|
Xtreme Guru
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Suomi Finland
Posts: 3,872
|
TPU review has simulated 5850 results via disabled shaders + 5850 reference clocks forced on 5870. Conclusion: 5850 is 10-15% slower than 5870.
__________________
You were not supposed to see this.
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 06:19 AM
|
#1880
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: IND
Posts: 362
|
well still wait for 5850.....i think best bang.......
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 06:34 AM
|
#1881
|
|
I am Xtreme
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,236
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredpace
I don't think an HD5870 is going to be faster than a GTX295 on average - perhaps only in a few instances. Computerbase.de has some average performance ratings of the cards relative to the GTX295 based on averages from all the listed benchmarks. I expect 5870 to be 95-98% and 5850 to be 80-85% of a GTX295's overall performance ( at this resolution)

Source:
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/h...ting_qualitaet
|
Heheh, I was close  :
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/h...ting_qualitaet
I bet we can reach 95% by cat 9.12.... lets go ATi!!
edit: It's more impressive with 8xAA:
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreYang
Damn...Today is 11/06, but [his] bios date is 11/07........lol
|
Last edited by jaredpace; 09-23-2009 at 08:40 AM.
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 08:10 AM
|
#1882
|
|
Xtreme Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 526
|
looks like dual 50's will be the top deal for the generation yet again.
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 08:12 AM
|
#1883
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 21
|
I'm still wondering if it is wise to upgrade my current GPU (4870 1GB) to a 5870 1GB. I play at 1080p, and personally don't really see that much of a difference between 4x AA and 8x AA (or more). Same as with more than 8x AF. I guess a 5870 2GB would probably be better choice, since I run out of VRAM at times.
From a casual-bencher POV, would it be wise to upgrade?
__________________
||
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 08:28 AM
|
#1884
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lunat!c#
I'm still wondering if it is wise to upgrade my current GPU (4870 1GB) to a 5870 1GB. I play at 1080p, and personally don't really see that much of a difference between 4x AA and 8x AA (or more). Same as with more than 8x AF. I guess a 5870 2GB would probably be better choice, since I run out of VRAM at times.
From a casual-bencher POV, would it be wise to upgrade?
|
I'll definetlly buy another 4870 1GB (they very cheap now)...
2*4870 1GB are quite good in 1080p....
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 08:56 AM
|
#1885
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 96
|
My 2x 5870s will be with me tommorow, they have been shipped from OCUK thismorning  cant wait.
__________________
Intel I7 2.66ghz @4.2Ghz 1.296v HT-Enabled | Biostar Tpower X58 DDR3 | 3x2 Ocz Blades 2000Mhz 9.9.9.30 @1600mhz 7.7.7.24.6.12.6.6.52 1.64v | PC-Power & Cooling 910w *75a* Single Rail Monster | Azuntech XFI Prelude 7.1 | 24" NeC MultiSync 24WMGX3 1920x1200 60hz | Sennhizer HD650 Headset | Various HDDs 5+ Terabyte | ThermalRight 120 Heatsink Push/Pull Config | 2x Sapphire 5870s X-Fire @1001/1301 *Stock Cooling* | LG Bluray Drive/Writer |
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 09:09 AM
|
#1886
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 40
|
__________________
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 09:21 AM
|
#1887
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,237
|
Is HD5870 bandwidth starved..? these games where 4870x2 is faster suggest so:
FO3 82.5 72.3 14%
FC2 75.6 66.5 14%
RE5 124.9 98.9 25%
BAT 131.9 108.2 22%
HAWX 105 74 42%
5870 is double everything, so just as 4870x2, although not handicapped by lower 750Mhz and CF efficiency. Only explanation is x2s 230GB/s vs 153GB/s bandwidth.
Solution? 6Ghz GDDR5 chips would provide 184GB/s - that extra 20% should close gap. However, to get 230GB/s would require 7.5Ghz GDDR5... AMD probably left room for the 5890!
-------------
It is very very doubtfull that nVidia would go from 384 GDDR3 -> 512 GDDR3 -> 256 GDDR5 and end up with similar bandwidth limit issues and thus barely faster than GTX285. Highest GDDR5 chips in spring 2009 (when first cards fabbed), are 6-7Gb/s from Samsung. Thus, both nVidia and AMD probably have either 384 (1.5GB) or 512bit (2GB) parts by early spring '10!!
__________________
24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 09:24 AM
|
#1888
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Italia-Abruzzo
Posts: 309
|
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 09:29 AM
|
#1889
|
|
Xtreme Cruncher
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 1,527
|
That thing looks great I think. Is that the 5850 or 5870?
__________________
Cooler Master ATCS 840 (black)
Q66 w/ Corsair H50 on a eVGA 680i SLI
Ballistix DDR2 800
9800GTX+
Corsair 850HX
HDD= 500GB(OS) 1TB(Storage)
Razer Tarantula & Deathadder
Acer 19" & 23" LCD
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 09:29 AM
|
#1890
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Italia-Abruzzo
Posts: 309
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuffPCair
That thing looks great I think. Is that the 5850 or 5870?
|
5870 reference 1gb with vapor x
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 09:38 AM
|
#1891
|
|
Xtreme Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 568
|
They are back in stock at Tigerdirect.com  .
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickshih
but the chip should like higher voltage , or LHE is useless.... 
|
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 09:57 AM
|
#1892
|
|
One-Eyed Killing Machine
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In an idiot-free environment
Posts: 5,030
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ***Deimos***
Is HD5870 bandwidth starved..? these games where 4870x2 is faster suggest so:
FO3 82.5 72.3 14%
FC2 75.6 66.5 14%
RE5 124.9 98.9 25%
BAT 131.9 108.2 22%
HAWX 105 74 42%
5870 is double everything, so just as 4870x2, although not handicapped by lower 750Mhz and CF efficiency. Only explanation is x2s 230GB/s vs 153GB/s bandwidth.
|
No, it's not.
And SLI / CF is like running the framebuffers ( GPU Memory ) in RAID 1 ( Mirroring ), not RAID 0 ( Striping ).
Meaning, the effective bandwidth in dual-GPU cards is the same as a single-GPU card using the same core.
The 4870X2 has 115Gbps not 230Gbps memory bandwidth.
__________________
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Oliver Baltuch, Steffen Eisentein
ASUS CAN LICK MY COJONES
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 10:06 AM
|
#1893
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chispy
They are back in stock at Tigerdirect.com  .
|
TigerDirect says "pre-order". Did they say "in stock" for you? I did place an order for the Asus 5870 for $391 shipped with $40 Bing Cash Back. I can deal with $350 all said and done. Hope it ships soon. Way cheaper than NewEgg for me since I live in Cali.
I really only needed a 5850 since I game at 1920x1200 but with the 5850 priced at $259 I hope the 5870 is worth the extra $90.
Last edited by rkgriffin; 09-23-2009 at 10:21 AM.
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 10:45 AM
|
#1894
|
|
Xtreme Mentor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxford, England
Posts: 3,029
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViRuS2k
My 2x 5870s will be with me tommorow, they have been shipped from OCUK thismorning  cant wait.
|
see told people they had them instock.. they just ran out insanley fast!  congrats
__________________
"Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is
"
//James
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 12:07 PM
|
#1896
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,237
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenchZowner
No, it's not.
And SLI / CF is like running the framebuffers ( GPU Memory ) in RAID 1 ( Mirroring ), not RAID 0 ( Striping ).
Meaning, the effective bandwidth in dual-GPU cards is the same as a single-GPU card using the same core.
The 4870X2 has 115Gbps not 230Gbps memory bandwidth.
|
4870x2 = 5870
5870 is like two 4870 cores.
(if we don't agree on this, then we need to take it up with AMD presentation slides).
4870x2 is 750Mhz, and CF CPU overhead and inefficiency
5870 is 850Mhz + IPC efficiency improvements.
How else do you explain 4870x2 being faster by up to 45%?? [EDIT: typo... its 42%] Magic?
BTW: 230GB/s vs 153GB/s = 49% more - coincidence?
The only other explanation is that 5870 uses different code path than R7, and is so poorly hashed together. But, if that was the case, 5870 wouldn't be faster than 4870x2 in other games (where 850Mhz 1600 SP is more influencial than 153GB bandwidth).
[EDIT2:
I also noticed GDDR5 can't be overclocked past 1300Mhz (8%).. even though volt-mod allows 1000Mhz+ (20%+) on the GPU, the performance improves only slightly corresponding to slight memory speed bump - I'd personally wait until they have cards with Samsung 6Gb/s or even 7Gb/s chips or the inevitable 5890 that will be released to spoil GT300 launch]
__________________
24/7: A64 3000+ (\_/) @2.4Ghz, 1.4V
1 GB OCZ Gold (='.'=) 240 2-2-2-5
Giga-byte NF3 (")_(") K8NSC-939
XFX 6800 16/6 NV5 @420/936, 1.33V
Last edited by ***Deimos***; 09-23-2009 at 12:17 PM.
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 12:08 PM
|
#1897
|
|
Xtreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bel Air, Maryland
Posts: 111
|
Broke down and finally bought an xfx one from http://linkecomputer.com/ but I didn't realize until after that they are hk based. Here's to hoping I don't get screwed, lol.
__________________
Intel Q6600 G0 with Corsair H50 @ (376x9) 3.38ghz
Asus P5K-E/WiFi-AP
G.Skill 4x2gb PI-BLACK @ 902 4-4-4-12 1.9v
XFX 5870 @ 1000/1300 1.225v *still testing* 9800GT dedicated physx
Corsair TX750W
Razer Lachesis w/ Razer Pro|Pad
1x160gb Seagate HDD, 2x1tb Seagate HDD
LG 22" 226WTQ & BenQ G2400WD
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 build 7600
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 12:17 PM
|
#1898
|
|
Xtreme Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 656
|
the 5850's look interesting, according to fud they overclock to the same levels as their big brother,wonder if the disabled shaders will be able to be unlocked at some future point like on the old ati 850's
Last edited by GLENBOY; 09-23-2009 at 12:59 PM.
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 12:28 PM
|
#1899
|
|
Tygon Warrior
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,909
|
Asus looks like the ideal maker so far. C'mon Hemlock! How long are these 5870's anyway? They look long enough.
***EDIT*** Never mind...Found it....28cm or 11 inches according to one review. Damn that is long. That was exactly how much space I had. Damn I hope Hemlock is not any longer.
Last edited by Sadasius; 09-23-2009 at 12:46 PM.
|
|
|
09-23-2009, 01:05 PM
|
#1900
|
|
Xtreme Addict
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,750
|
ya, i just checked my case as well and even my 4850 blocks one slot of the hdd cage. if i remember the length of the 4850 correctly the 5870 is as much as 5cm longer! bad thing is, due to the 5870's dualslot cooler one free hdd cage slot isn't enough to fit the card in my case... since the hdd cage has 4 slots from which i use 3 a 5870 won't fit until i remove one hdd from my pc  now that sux 
__________________
1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 @690/1093 MHz / WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 Surround Speaker // SysProfile
2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Hitachi Deskstar 40GB, 2x Seagate Medalist 10GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W
Server: MSI K7T266 Pro2-R / AMD Athlon XP 2000+ @~1666 MHz (12,5x133,3) / 2x256 MB Kingston PC2300, 2.0-3-3-6 / PixelView GeForce FX 5900XT / WD Caviar 160GB + Seagate 80GB
|
|
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:38 PM.
|