Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 39

Thread: thermolab BARAM vs ULTRA-120 eXtreme [LGA1366 Test]

  1. #1
    Champion
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Seoul,korea
    Posts
    370

    thermolab BARAM vs ULTRA-120 eXtreme [LGA1366 Test]

    It is cooler developing in Korean enterprise.(http://thermolab.co.kr/)

    Performance is very good and price is inexpensive.

    Korea Retail price $44.58 (USD)



















    Measurement point






    I did ULTRA-120 eXtreme course comparison test.

    Test rig..
    Mainboard : Asus Rampage II Extreme
    CPU : I7 920
    Memory : Gskill 12800 HK 2G Triple CH
    Power : Enermax Revolution85+ ERV1250EGT
    FAN : Bio Sonic 35T 120mm
    Cooler : Thermolab BARAM & ULTRA-120 eXtreme


    Test condition
    [CPU : 4G Vcore : 1.35V]
    Room TEMP : 17.8℃
    FAN : Bio Sonic 35T 120mm (3000rpm)
    CPU Full Load Utill : EVEREST FPU Stress Test




    Video test..

    ULTRA-120 eXtreme
    http://v.egloos.com/v.sk/egloos/a010...00000845701701


    thermolab BARAM
    http://v.egloos.com/v.sk/egloos/a010...00000846021701





    Result...
    ULTRA-120 eXtreme → 30℃
    BARAM → 31℃

    ULTRA-120 eXtreme is superior 1℃. But, I am thought that BARAN that price is more inexpensive is very superior.


    BARAM → Korea Retail price 44.58 (USD)
    ULTRA-120 eXtreme → Korea Retail price 71.90 (USD)
    Last edited by OC_Windforce; 01-22-2009 at 11:03 PM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,676
    1C difference is in the margin of error. Was the TRUE Lapped?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    735
    holy crap i can even see your nail hasn't been cut in a long time.... that really clear for a base.
    Everyday is a NiceDay

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    Wow I thought the camera was sitting on the base

    If the Baram is like xigmateks coolers we may have a new price/performance leader.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    498
    Maybe its a camera with a cooler
    EVGA X58 Classified
    Intel Core i7 980X @ 4ghz
    EVGA 590 GTX x2 Quad SLI
    Corsair Dominator DDR3 12GB PC3-12800C8
    Western Digital 150 GB Velociraptor
    Corsair AX1200
    Asus Xonar Xense
    Custom Watercooling
    Lian Li Pc-P80 Armoursuit

  6. #6
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    'burb of Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,871
    I've been saying it for a while, heatsink manufacturers need to spread the heatpipes out within the fins instead of leaving them grouped together. BARAM did it with this and it performs wonderfully.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Poland/London
    Posts
    105
    Awesome, especially the base, like a goddamn mirror.
    Is it only me but it looks like mutated ultra? ;e

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cairo
    Posts
    2,366
    Is that a machine finish or they lap those things
    Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
    Asus X58 P6T
    6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
    XFX HD5870
    WD 1TB Black HD
    Corsair 850TX
    Cooler Master HAF 922

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    208
    Any testing with 2 fans? Last test I saw shown significant improvements much like a TRUE when you put 2 fans on it.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    368
    WOW this looks so good! I really believe that Thor cooler from xigmatek has some real chance of beating true now...

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    1,071
    Quote Originally Posted by OC_Windforce
    Result...
    ULTRA-120 eXtreme → 30℃
    BARAM → 31℃
    Is it load temps? Why so low?

    Sorry for my bad English

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Trinidad and Tobago
    Posts
    400
    Quote Originally Posted by Polizei View Post
    I've been saying it for a while, heatsink manufacturers need to spread the heatpipes out within the fins instead of leaving them grouped together. BARAM did it with this and it performs wonderfully.

    well said
    Rig 1 Asus ROG Strix B550-F WiFi, R7 5800x, 64GB Vengeance LPX 4*16GB, Zotac GTX 1070Ti, X-Fi Titanium, Enermax Revolution D.F. 850w, SSDs 768GB, HDD 3TB, CM 912HAF, NH D-15 Black.cr
    Rig 2 Asus Maximus VI Hero, i7 4770K@4000, 32GB Ballistix VLP 4*8GB, Gigabyte GTX 970, eVGA G3 850, SSD 512GB, HDD 2TB, TT Element-T, NH D-14.

  13. #13
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by L'enFer View Post
    Is it load temps? Why so low?
    Thermal probe put near to the IHS....not die temps. :-/

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    1,071
    "Near"? How near should the temp sensor be placed to show that temperatures? It is only 14 degree higher than room temp.

    Sorry for my bad English

  15. #15
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Mill out the IHS and place it in the IHS

    That's what Intel does at least

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    46
    X-Bit labs has a review on Baram....http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/coo...lab-baram.html

    My Rig : | Intel Core i7 920 @ 4.2Ghz 1.32V (24/7), #3841A383 | Cooler Master CM690 | Asus P6T X58 | TRUE 120 (Push/Pull) | MSI NX8800GTS | Asus 6 x 1GB DDR3-1333 ram @ DDR3-1600| 80GB WD IDE, 120GB Maxtor IDE, 320GB Hitachi SATA II, 500GB Hitachi SATA II | LG Blu Ray Burner 6x | Topower 600W psu | Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 | Dell 2208WFP 22" LCD Monitor | Sony 32" D Series LCD TV 100Hz/24p |
    My Consoles : | PS3 60GB Asia | Wii NTSC-J | 2 x Stupid XBox360, both 3RROD |

  17. #17
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    North Carolina, USA
    Posts
    965
    I still prefer the TuniQ Tower 120 design to all others similar.
    CPU: Intel i5-3570K @ 4.2ghz (1.064V)
    GPU: SLI ASUS GTX 660 Ti DCII 2GB @ 1215/7012
    LCD: BenQ XL2420TE (144Hz)
    Mobo: ASRock Z77 Extreme6
    Sound: SoundBlaster ZXR + Yamaha RX-V863 (LPCM) + Polk Audio Monitor Series II Speakers
    RAM: G.SKILL Sniper Series DDR3 2133 4x4GB
    Storage: Samsung 840 Pro 128GB + 1TB Seagate Barracuda +1TB WD Black Caviar
    PSU: Corsair HX 750W 80+ Silver (62A)
    UPS: Cyberpower CP1200AVR (720W)
    OS: Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate x64
    Cooling: Corsair 650D + TT Water2.0 Pro + 2x Silverstone FM121

  18. #18
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    West Covina. CA
    Posts
    1,301
    What is xbit labs doing with that review?

    OCCT is great, but...

    1.5v for a QX9650? What's the watts output of that chip when running at 3.7 ghz and that extremely high vcore? I think it exceeds the max specs for those heatpies numbers on BOTH coolers, right? I'm surprised the system didn't reboot in linpack.....

    90C sure sounds like the liquid was remaining vaporized in the heatpipes...

    And I don't think anyone here has had a QX9650 that required 1.5v for just 3.9 ghz...

  19. #19
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Falkentyne View Post
    What is xbit labs doing with that review?

    OCCT is great, but...

    1.5v for a QX9650? What's the watts output of that chip when running at 3.7 ghz and that extremely high vcore? I think it exceeds the max specs for those heatpies numbers on BOTH coolers, right? I'm surprised the system didn't reboot in linpack.....

    90C sure sounds like the liquid was remaining vaporized in the heatpipes...

    And I don't think anyone here has had a QX9650 that required 1.5v for just 3.9 ghz...
    Something really common with HSF reviews: adding voltage for the sake of adding heat. It's basically 'free' heat since power scales with the square of the voltage and adding voltage (to non-stupid levels) doesn't hamper stability either.

    And they're probably nowhere near maxing out either HSF

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    246
    Quote Originally Posted by Falkentyne View Post
    What is xbit labs doing with that review?

    OCCT is great, but...

    1.5v for a QX9650? What's the watts output of that chip when running at 3.7 ghz and that extremely high vcore? I think it exceeds the max specs for those heatpies numbers on BOTH coolers, right? I'm surprised the system didn't reboot in linpack.....

    90C sure sounds like the liquid was remaining vaporized in the heatpipes...

    And I don't think anyone here has had a QX9650 that required 1.5v for just 3.9 ghz...
    A lot of us use more than 1.5v in bench mode

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny Bravo View Post
    That's because in the process of benching the card all setup I learned a few things about Qimonda memory:
    [*]It sucks[*]It doesn't like voltage[*]It doesn't like the cold[*]It suck[*]It dies real easily[*]err....did I mention it sucks?

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati , OH
    Posts
    124
    error: Cannot order stuff off .kr
    i7 920
    P6T Deluxe
    6GB G-skill 1600
    4870 1gb
    2x 500gb 7,200 barracuda raid 0
    900W PSU
    BenQ G2400WD 24"
    Sennheiser PC 350

    http://www.youtube.com/user/knissel

  22. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    78
    Quote Originally Posted by Ar3s View Post
    holy crap i can even see your nail hasn't been cut in a long time.... that really clear for a base.
    Coolermaster HAF932; Gigabyte P35 DS3-R; Core 2 Duo e6420@3200mhz; Thermaltake V1; OCZ DDR2 PC2-6400 Platinum 800mhz; Zotac 8800gts 320mb; Corsair HX520W; Seagate 160gb.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1, Brazil
    Posts
    888
    X-Bit reviewed BARAM http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/coo...lab-baram.html

    For sure this cooler rocks, in this review, it won true by a marge of 2ºc. Awesome for the price

  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    West Covina. CA
    Posts
    1,301
    Quote Originally Posted by ultimeus View Post
    A lot of us use more than 1.5v in bench mode
    I know that
    but not at 3.9 or 3.7 ghz....

    Either they have the worst chip known to man or it suffered some sort of damage...
    The highest I saw it taking a QX to hit 4 ghz was 1.45v....
    Last edited by Falkentyne; 01-26-2009 at 04:44 PM.

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    72
    amazing cooler, espacially the size, smaller than the true and same performance.
    where can i get this cooler? i cant find it
    Last edited by Salsoolo; 01-26-2009 at 04:57 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •