Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: X58 SLI Test: Crysis Warhead vs Far Cry 2

Threaded View

  1. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    866
    Quote Originally Posted by takamishanoku View Post
    Depends on what they artists are going after. Far Cry 2 is a good looking game regadless and at 16fps Crysis will indeed be a photorealistic slide show.
    Don't get me wrong Crysis is graphically peerless and the best ever. I just still fail to see why you can get 69 vs 16 fps. That's almost 5 times worst off.
    and none of that even makes any diference with the horrible gameplay Far Cry 2 has. I thought Crysis had shallow gameplay, now it seems like heaven to me after playing Far Cry 2 for a couple hours. I do like the engine though, the map editor is meh, its very easy to use, and you can make some awesome stuff fast, but variety is limited.

    Ultimately, the only thing actually impressive to me in Far Cry 2 graphics wise is the sunsets and early morning, the shadows look great and the sun and rays look amazing, rays in my opinion are better than Crysis, cant explain but they seem more realistic. Also, the interiors of Far Cry 2 amazed me alot, very detailed and lighting looks great.
    Last edited by Decami; 10-25-2008 at 02:19 AM.
    This post above was delayed 90 times by Nvidia. Cause that's their thing, thats what they do.
    This Announcement of the delayed post above has been brought to you by Nvidia Inc.

    RIGGY
    case:Antec 1200
    MB: XFX Nforce 750I SLI 72D9
    CPU:E8400 (1651/4x9) 3712.48
    MEM:4gb Gskill DDR21000 (5-5-5-15)
    GPU: NVIDIA GTX260 EVGA SSC (X2 in SLI) both 652/1403
    PS:Corsair 650TX
    OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate
    --Cooling--
    5x120mm 1x200mm
    Zalman 9700LED
    Displays: Samsung LN32B650/Samsung 2243BWX/samsung P2350


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •