Is itOriginally Posted by SoulsCollective
COOL.
I have had my sys higher but its most stable were it is.
As for the ram(sawblades) they are the corsair dominators
that you could saw a tree with.=pc6400
I have the d9 ballistix=pc8500 but they SUCK.
Maybe its the cryogenicllay frozen Q66 i have
Its been through phase and lived through 2 dead mobo,s
maximus SE and my old rampage, both killed my my phase cooler.
But its still kickin
_______________
Q66@3.8ghz
Rampage/Maximus SE hybrid W/C. 4 gigs OCZ reapers.
4890,s CF Dual loop rocketfish case.
^^^^^All shaken, (from the earthquake) not stirred^^^^^
The only thing future proof in electronics, is the electricity itself.There's a lot less voodoo in watercooling than is assumed
Any one who relies on only one source of information is a fool.
Thing that was throwing me off was the Phenom guys hitting less than 20ms (avg elapsed)
I know the AMD,s smoke the Intels in some benchies.
Just wasnt sure if this was one of them????
Edit: Just seen were Particle said higher is better.
So im off to go higher
Last edited by sirheck; 10-11-2008 at 10:57 PM.
_______________
Q66@3.8ghz
Rampage/Maximus SE hybrid W/C. 4 gigs OCZ reapers.
4890,s CF Dual loop rocketfish case.
^^^^^All shaken, (from the earthquake) not stirred^^^^^
The only thing future proof in electronics, is the electricity itself.There's a lot less voodoo in watercooling than is assumed
Any one who relies on only one source of information is a fool.
My crap/old pc in action
"friends don't let friends run RAID-0"
err no use PNG, if you do proper screenshots without uber 1337 desktop background
@ particle. could you make it run for one cpu, then all, and show both scores, and the multiplier difference between them?
think having hyper threading might hurt this benchmark or help it? because most likely the program sees the extra thread as another core which it is not.
edit: can everyone post their system specs when they post? would be nice to see what is giving high scores. seems to be mostly memory related.
Last edited by roofsniper; 10-12-2008 at 08:35 AM.
Ok here are my BIOS settings.
Edit: I,m on XP 32
Last edited by sirheck; 10-12-2008 at 08:57 AM.
_______________
Q66@3.8ghz
Rampage/Maximus SE hybrid W/C. 4 gigs OCZ reapers.
4890,s CF Dual loop rocketfish case.
^^^^^All shaken, (from the earthquake) not stirred^^^^^
The only thing future proof in electronics, is the electricity itself.There's a lot less voodoo in watercooling than is assumed
Any one who relies on only one source of information is a fool.
12700 Vista64
16400 XP32
Phenom 8450 @2,36 GHz
I don't think HT would hurt this benchmark. This program measures overall throughput--the amount of time needed to complete the task doesn't directly relate to your score.
@Manicdan: Sure, I can do that.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
what do you think the performance hit going from vista 64 to xp32 is related to?
Probably the same as most other benchmarks and apps.
Vista uses more resources
_______________
Q66@3.8ghz
Rampage/Maximus SE hybrid W/C. 4 gigs OCZ reapers.
4890,s CF Dual loop rocketfish case.
^^^^^All shaken, (from the earthquake) not stirred^^^^^
The only thing future proof in electronics, is the electricity itself.There's a lot less voodoo in watercooling than is assumed
Any one who relies on only one source of information is a fool.
Look at screenshots from x32 and x64 systems. Right at the top of the windows it says Running in x86 mode or Running in AMD64 mode.Probably the same as most other benchmarks and apps.
Vista uses more resources
It looks like whichever compiler did this job it wasn't very good at compiling for AMD64
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55''Samsung LED 3D TV
well this program does use all available power and since vista does use more resources that might be it. anyone have a vista 32 vista 64 comparison?Probably the same as most other benchmarks and apps.
Vista uses more resources
I have a dell laptop with vista32 and an intel T5700 c2d.
Guess i could try it on that.
_______________
Q66@3.8ghz
Rampage/Maximus SE hybrid W/C. 4 gigs OCZ reapers.
4890,s CF Dual loop rocketfish case.
^^^^^All shaken, (from the earthquake) not stirred^^^^^
The only thing future proof in electronics, is the electricity itself.There's a lot less voodoo in watercooling than is assumed
Any one who relies on only one source of information is a fool.
I did some testing and I can confirm it: This runs faster in x86. I don't think it was my obfuscator, either. I'll continue to play around with it and see why.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
I ran in xp64 and it was very similar to vista64. I was able to manage a 30950 in xp64. See below, but it took nearly 4.1ghz and 1090mhz or so on the ram.
Edit: is there any way to force this to run in x86? I would be happy to test.
Last edited by speedfreak86; 10-12-2008 at 11:57 AM.
Asus Maximus Formula (Rampage Conversion Bios 0403)
Q6600 G0 stepping@4.05 Ghz
8GB G. Skill 1066 @ 1081 Mhz
EVGA 280 GTX
Auzentech Prelude
2X 74 GB WD Raptors in Raid 0 Windows 7 Ultimate 64
2X 1 TB WD Caviar Blacks in Raid 0 Vista Ultimate x64
Thermaltake Toughpower 1200W
DTek Fuzion V2 in a custom CPU only water loop
Coolermaster Stacker 830
Hanns-G 28" widescreen
Klipsh Pro-Media 2.1
G15 Keyboard and G9 Laser Mouse
on a maximus II Formula cheap ocz ram at 412mhz all voltages in bios set to auto on vista 32 bit
Maybe we should post system config with score...Kinda hard to see what is what.
Here is my 3.4ghz Phenom 9950
2gig OCZ 1066mhz 5-5-5-18 22
Win XP 32bit.
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
anyone have an idea how this program runs? particle do you know what it tests the most? mostly ram? and if ram is it ram timings or frequency or what? would be nice to pinpoint what changes give the biggest changes in score. also make a top 5 list in the first post
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
probably it mostly tests ram timings and cpu frequeancyanyone have an idea how this program runs? particle do you know what it tests the most? mostly ram? and if ram is it ram timings or frequency or what? would be nice to pinpoint what changes give the biggest changes in score. also make a top 5 list in the first post
[SIGPIC]
specs plz
edit: is that a period or a comma? lol
qx9650 running @ 4.2Ghz
Corsair dominator 2gb 2000Mhz 8-8-8-22 1T
[SIGPIC]
yea id consider this more of a ram benchmark. i believe you are the only one running ddr3 and your score is much higher than anyone else.qx9650 running @ 4.2Ghz
Corsair dominator 2gb 2000Mhz 8-8-8-22 1T
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks