Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 79

Thread: Allendale @ 460FSB +

  1. #26
    **********
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    450
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER

    Ok, I give up. WTF is this??
    Nice screen, FUGGER
    But I will not have not enough imagination to assume what it is.

  2. #27
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    4,594
    Temps?

  3. #28
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER
    Hmmm...interesting....While there's an obvious improvement in the architecture, I would have thought the difference between Core and Core 2 would have been much bigger......Yonah on air:


  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    229
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER
    Stock vcore I can boot @ 333FSB

    1.4v I can boot to 30% over 333FSB = 433FSB

    NB @ 1.6v
    Memory @ 2.2v



    Ok, I give up. WTF is this??

    Lol ! AMD hacked into Intel's chip !?!?

  5. #30
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Molde, Norway
    Posts
    261
    Quote Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
    Hmmm...interesting....While there's an obvious improvement in the architecture, I would have thought the difference between Core and Core 2 would have been much bigger......Yonah on air:

    Interesting, but how tweaked is that OS?

  6. #31
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Kjaks
    Interesting, but how tweaked is that OS?
    It's not tweaked at all

  7. #32
    xtreme energy
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Europe, Latvia
    Posts
    4,145
    SP maybe not so huge but in 3D I'd say there is a HUGE difference. I am getting like 7-8K more 2k1 at the same speed vs yonah.
    ...

  8. #33
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    805
    *lol* at the screenshot!

    Visit Site: FanBoyReview™
    TEST
    (c)1999-2010 DM
    All rights reserve, All wrongs deserve

    Yeehaw
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER
    ROFL, the "retail" clause now.

    Let it go man, Conroe is gonna punk AMD bad.

  9. #34
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by kiwi
    SP maybe not so huge but in 3D I'd say there is a HUGE difference. I am getting like 7-8K more 2k1 at the same speed vs yonah.
    It's cuz your conroe is 4mb l2 cache

  10. #35
    SSD faster than your HDD
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    2,627
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER
    Ok, I give up. WTF is this??

    That is to keep the Fanboys out of your thread, and your PC.
    I think it monitors and says "AMD............no CPU for you"

  11. #36
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Québec, Canada
    Posts
    975
    Quote Originally Posted by Evilsizer
    guys the only way to compare the 2 would be to have both the 2.4ghz 2mb vs 2.4ghz 4mb. I havent seen the 2.4ghz 2mb es yet, unless he has a ES and is not locked on upping the multi.
    You can't higher the multi, but you can lower it.

    So a E6600 with 7x multi would make a good comparison with that chip.
    Compare both at 1.86. Then we will see if the 4MB cache worth it.
    Last edited by Vric; 06-03-2006 at 04:45 AM.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Edinburgh - UK
    Posts
    1,334
    From Guru3D

    Microsoft's Away Mode is also a requirement for AMD Live! compliant systems. Away Mode will allow a system to shutdown all components that are unused by a user when they are "away" from the machine. Some of the components listed are: displays, keyboards, mice, remote controls, and other non essentials. The machine continues to operate normally, with the power LED on the system will indicate an off state -- although safety issues may arise from a user thinking that the machine is off when in fact, it's still operating. According to Away Mode specifications, the machine will continue to operate normally so that tasks such as file downloading and transferring can still take place without requiring much power. Away Mode is only supported in Microsoft's Windows XP Media Center Edition with Rollup 2 update. Apparently, the Away Mode feature is part of the Live! specification and is not a feature available to Intel Viiv systems.
    Nothing to fear then Fugger...apart from the fact it shouldn't even be there!

  13. #38
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
    Hmmm...interesting....While there's an obvious improvement in the architecture, I would have thought the difference between Core and Core 2 would have been much bigger......Yonah on air:
    There *is* a very large difference- this is just 3158MHz:


  14. #39
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam
    There *is* a very large difference- this is just 3158MHz:
    Ummmm....please read post #34

  15. #40
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    boston,ma
    Posts
    3,184
    keep up the good work fugger
    Abit KN9-SLI
    X2 3800+
    1gb corsair pc5400
    2 evga 7900gt
    200gb maxtor sata
    ocz 520w
    heatware:althes
    ebay althes

  16. #41
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
    Ummmm....please read post #34
    Quite a head scratcher...I still can't believe that this architecture relies so heavily on cache... core 2 is quite different from core, sort of sad to think that the cache by itself is where most of the oopmh seems to be coming from. :-/

  17. #42
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Athens , Hellas
    Posts
    555

  18. #43
    xtreme energy
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Europe, Latvia
    Posts
    4,145
    Quote Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
    It's cuz your conroe is 4mb l2 cache
    I think 2MB models will do similar, maybe 1K-2K less than 4MB models
    ...

  19. #44
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Turkey / ANK
    Posts
    214
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam
    There *is* a very large difference- this is just 3158MHz:

    T7200 mobile?
    Q6600 1.390v 3.8G Vid: 1.2125 Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme .DFI LanParty DK P35-T2RS. Crucial Ballistix Tracer 8500 2x1GB.. Seagate 410As Raid0 .. Sapphire HD4870 512mb & Cooling Thermalright HR-03 GT.. 19 LG 1950SQ .. Silverstone OP850 watt. Case Gigabyte Auro3D

  20. #45
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    518
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam
    Quite a head scratcher...I still can't believe that this architecture relies so heavily on cache... core 2 is quite different from core, sort of sad to think that the cache by itself is where most of the oopmh seems to be coming from. :-/
    There a lot more to core than just the cache . Like the 4 x86 decoders for example. But it does look somewhat cache dependent.
    ***Main System ***
    Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13 Ghz @ 3.6 Ghz
    Abit IP35-E
    4GB DDR2 RAM
    XFX HD 5770
    3x 120 GB HD
    2x 160 GB HD
    Antec Trueblue 2.0 480 Watt

  21. #46
    XS_THE_MACHINE
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    4,678
    I suppose your running the mem 1:1 right fugger?? These are some very good results. A good chip running 6x400 with mem running 1:1. That sounds like a good gaming rig.
    "Victory is always possible for the person who refuses to stop fighting"

    clicks to save kids

  22. #47
    Admin
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hillsboro, OR
    Posts
    5,225
    Quote Originally Posted by cupholder2.0
    There a lot more to core than just the cache . Like the 4 x86 decoders for example. But it does look somewhat cache dependent.
    That's exactly what I'm saying. Which is why its so odd that a Yonah is able to keep up with it...I guess pi is just very cache-centric, in 3D it should be a different story.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Taipei,Taiwan
    Posts
    145
    Are conroe and Allendale have the same die size?
    Last edited by oijkue; 06-03-2006 at 07:35 AM.

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    392
    Quote Originally Posted by oijkue
    Are conroe and Allendale have the same die size?
    allendale is conroe it just doesnt have the extra 2mb L2 enabled. What do you think they would do with all the early dies that had some bad L2 cache on it.
    Intel Pentium G3258 | ASRock Z97M OC Formula | Samsung 2x4GB DDR3-1600 | Galaxy GTX660 GC | Samsung PM840 Pro 128GB, PM830 250GB FDE |

    "I Love To Camp!"
    "Comensing Shock Therapy!"

    HeatWare

  25. #50
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by Gautam
    That's exactly what I'm saying. Which is why its so odd that a Yonah is able to keep up with it...I guess pi is just very cache-centric, in 3D it should be a different story.
    For the most part, the shorter PI runs seem to be most affected by the difference in L2 Cache, but run a 32m and the gap lessens even more. Just take a look at the performance of Core Solo vs. Core Duo and you'll see what I mean

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •