Results 1 to 25 of 52

Thread: Omega Thermocouple (in IHS) Vs. Onboard Sensors

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme X.I.P. MaxxxRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles, Ca USA
    Posts
    12,551
    Quote Originally Posted by FLB
    The next question is why is so much heat being spread through a relativly thin IHS. "My theory" is that it has to do with the high resistance (compared to the copper spreader) of the tim joint. As thin as the spreader is it's much easier for the heat to move lateraly than to move straight through the TIM joint. The more the heat spreads, the lower the TIM resistance becomes (due to the now larger heat transfer area).
    The problem with your theory is that not so much of the heat is being spread through the IHS as you think...

  2. #2
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    314
    Here I am getting all wrapped up in this. *sigh* Better then watching American Idol with the woman though.

    To stop the side distractions a very clear goal and testing method needs to be established. So far it seems to be evolving which is fine. What info are we after? Are we measuring pure waterblock performance or leaving that job to the block makers? Is it more encompassing then Maxxx has the tools for at the current time? Would forum users get more out of what the "average Joe" will see temp wise at the IHS if the "average Joe" followed the directions for mounting and applying thermal compound from the vendor and had the same pump and radiator as tested. Or are we after something else.

    What I am about to say is all hypothetical. Lets say in a lab enviroment the Storm outperforms a TDX for raw heat transfer performance, but what if 9 out of 10 users have an easier time mounting the TDX to lab specs, where only 5 out of 10 can mount the Storm properly to get those ideal temps. What block is then best? What exactly are we interested in?

    So are we studying absolute heat transfer performance of the blocks or block performance as veiwed from the "average Joe", or some other study. If we define what we are looking for then some of this side talk can be more clearly focused. I don't really care what is decided as the goal, I would be interested in either of my exampes or something else, we just need a clearly defined one so all this excess energy eveyone has is properly channeled.

    edit: thanks for the link FLB.
    Last edited by aicjofs; 03-07-2006 at 09:23 PM.
    3770K @ 4.8Ghz 1.42V | GSkill 2x4GB @ 1066Mhz | Asrock Extreme4
    2600K @ 4.5Ghz 1.38V | GSkill 2x4GB @ 933Mhz CAS 9-10-9 1.5v | Asrock Z68M/USB
    1090T @ 3.8 Ghz 1.42V | Crucial 4x2GB 666 CAS 8 | Asus M4A79XTD EVO
    Q6600 @ 3.66Ghz(8x458) 1.35V | GSkill 2x2GB @ 550Mhz 5:5:3:13 2.1V | Asus Maximus Formula(Rampage 0401) |


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •