Results 1 to 25 of 397

Thread: AMD Shows Deneb (Phenom II) pictures of 6.2GHz CPUz etc

Threaded View

  1. 12-05-2008, 12:36 PM #11
    G0ldBr1ck
    G0ldBr1ck is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Send a message via MSN to G0ldBr1ck
    Quote Originally Posted by frankR View Post
    No one else calling BS on this? Remember when Phenom was supposed to be capable of 4 Ghz on air in Q107.
    OMG, Yes AMD created a Hacked CPUZ then invited all the well know press to come view this new hacked CPUZ. Then they threatend harm to there families if they did not report on this being real. Then they shipped out some ES CPU's and a copy of there hacked CPUZ along with$100,000 usd to well know review sites to make up fake CPUZ Screen shots and tell us how great PHII is. Now after all that they are going to show there hacked fake OC's to tons of Techies in SF, Chicago, and Boston and send them home to tell us all piles of lies...................................and they are doing all this because It will help them as a company. Yep thats it.

    PS. that was not realy directed at you frankR tho I quoted you. It was just in general to all the skepticism. so please take no offense

    PSS. I hear now that this super hacked CPUZ is now being held in a High security vault somewhere deep below Area51.
    Last edited by G0ldBr1ck; 12-05-2008 at 01:01 PM.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules