Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 107

Thread: NVIDIA Announces GeForce GTX 480M Mobile GPU

  1. #26
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    I'm all for faster mobile gpu's, but Nvidia is gonna have their work cut out for them keeping the heat acceptable.

    I'd like to have non-deformed sperm for at least a while longer!

  2. #27
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by mk-ultra View Post
    lol the jokes went from slow,hot unmanufaturable to hot only
    LOL, yeah i remember that genius with insider info. He was insisting that GTX 258 would be the fastest nVidia GPU. Then was taking about a broken and unmanufaturable product. That genius doesn't dare to write in this forum any more, but many kids are still repeating his ideas and attitude.

    There is not such a thing as a hot product, there is only bad cooling solutions in the world of OCers.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  3. #28
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    401
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    LOL, yeah i remember that genius with insider info. He was insisting that GTX 258 would be the fastest nVidia GPU. Then was taking about a broken and unmanufaturable product. That genius doesn't dare to write in this forum any more, but many kids are still repeating his ideas and attitude.
    How man 512SP GF100s are there, again?
    Gaming Box

    Ryzen R7 1700X * ASUS PRIME X370-Pro * 2x8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200 * XFX Radeon RX 480 8GB * Corsair HX620 * 250GB Crucial BX100 * 1TB Seagate 7200.11

    EK Supremacy MX * Swiftech MCR320 * 3x Fractal Venture HP-12 * EK D5 PWM

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Mats View Post
    Wanted: Lots of jokes about how hot it is and how much power it uses, maybe throw in "can it play crysis?" while you're at it, or a pic of a burning laptop. We just can't get enough of it.

    Really.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
    How man 512SP GF100s are there, again?
    How knows, maybe they need time to fix the drivers, BIOS, yield, heat, power usage, or other stuff. But, and it is a big butt . maybe nVidia doesn't feel the need for 512, at least as long as GTX 480 beats the 5870.
    In my opinion, nVidia needs a double GPU to compete with 5970, not a 512 single GPU.

    Why should they drop the 512 now, to compete with what you think?

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176

  7. #32
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    ^^ you got something constructive to say, or just trying to be funny in the middle of a serious discussion? Grow up.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  8. #33
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Quote Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
    How man 512SP GF100s are there, again?
    Come 485 September we'll find out
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    ^^ you got something constructive to say, or just trying to be funny in the middle of a serious discussion? Grow up.
    There is no serious discussion, merely some light speculation.

    What is said and happens in this thread will in no way affect anything of value.

    Maturity is a three stage process.
    1. Being too open and accepting situations that contradict your feelings of valour.
    2. Becoming entirely unreasonable and controlling.
    3. A mix of 1 and 2.

    ie; grow up yourself and stop being stubborn, a mere calling on someone's bluff in a comical manner in a thread is entirely viable as a response.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    There is no serious discussion, merely some light speculation.

    What is said and happens in this thread will in no way affect anything of value.

    Maturity is a three stage process.
    1. Being too open and accepting situations that contradict your feelings of valour.
    2. Becoming entirely unreasonable and controlling.
    3. A mix of 1 and 2.

    ie; grow up yourself and stop being stubborn, a mere calling on someone's bluff in a comical manner in a thread is entirely viable as a response.
    Can't you catch the point that we are talking about the fastest Mobile GPU on earth?
    What else would be serious enough to stop your childish pictures and funny comments? Got an example what you would consider as serious enough to act as a grown up?

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  11. #36
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    It was actually pretty fast, after all Fermi is just a few months old. Why should we call it "castrated Fermi"? nobody puts a full blown desktop GPU in a notebook. Maybe a flexible and scalable Fermi-architecture is making this possible so fast?
    that dose not show flexibility a new chip would, this shows that it can be castrated, cutting those clusters out dose not help power consumption so its clocked lower and will suck up extra power for no reason.

    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    Hmm, if the way they cut the units are the same...

    0.7x core clock
    ~0.75x memory clock

    So you get 0.8x (max) perf of a GTX 465, which itself like a GTX 285/275 or so...
    GTX260 performance or so?

    It will definitely be the fastest mobile GPU, no thanks to the anemic 128-bit memory interface of Juniper (you can't really clock RAM fast on notebooks). But the gap should be less than expected- about 15-20% more performance? For double the TDP...


    I'm still seeing HP's Envy 15 (if it didn't have that many problems)/17 as the perfect notebook blend for the majority of gamers (who really game)- definitely enough graphics performance, without the heft or uglyness associated with a gaming notebook. These are just gonna sell way more than any Alienware/Clevo, so nVidia really needs a 20-40W lineup on Fermi soon, and hopefully GF104 is (part) of the answer.

    But really, congrats to nVidia on making a 530mm2 chip fit with 100W cooling on a design, and actually selling it! ATI would have a hard time doing that for several reasons.
    there is no chance of this beating the 5870m, the clock speed is to low and that low clock speed will make its texture processing way to slow like close to a mobile g92 but with more geometry like what a 260 original would have. there is no chance that it will compete with the 5870m. the 5870m is close to the 5770 so since the desktop 465 is slower than the desktop 5850 and the desktop 5770 isnt to far behind so with this massive clock down i would expect it to be bottleneck its self in the texture fill rate.

    i will agree that its an accomplishment to get it sub 100W but i would expect that for the gpu not the platform.

    we really need that new fermi die to bring the prices down, it should even match the stupidly giant die in performance with normal power and normal cooling
    Last edited by zanzabar; 05-25-2010 at 01:04 PM.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  12. #37
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by zanzabar View Post
    that dose not show flexibility a new chip would, this shows that it can be castrated, cutting those clusters out dose not help power consumption so its clocked lower and will suck up extra power for no reason.



    ..
    This is a new chip based on Fermi-architecture. I don't get what do you man by a new chip? maybe you want a new architecture?

    By your logic all mobile GPUs should be called "castrated", but you are wrong, all mobile GPUs are new chips based on the respective desktop models.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    Can't you catch the point that we are talking about the fastest Mobile GPU on earth?
    What else would be serious enough to stop your childish pictures and funny comments?

    Got an example what you would consider as serious enough to act as a grown up?
    Beating down on someone you shall never meet, who will never have any relation to your power of choice in your physical life with vigour and distaste.

    You're all very mature people.

    As much as all your 'talking' matters (which is nought considering none of you have responsibility for nvidia) why would a light-hearted and whimsical post emotionally influence you in a NEGATIVE manner?

    Unless you have emotional boundary issues and can't stand the actions of others without trying to assert control.
    Last edited by Jowy Atreides; 05-25-2010 at 01:13 PM.

  14. #39
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    This is a new chip based on Fermi-architecture. I don't get what do you man by a new chip? maybe you want a new architecture?

    By your logic all mobile GPUs should be called "castrated", but you are wrong, all mobile GPUs are new chips based on the respective desktop models.
    wasnt this a physically cut down gf100, if it is a new chip that is not just a gf100 with parts disabled then i take my comment back, also its gddr3 so the 256bit bus is not an advantage over a 128bit gddr5
    Last edited by zanzabar; 05-25-2010 at 01:15 PM.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  15. #40
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    435
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    is the chip going into the laptops really that big, just shut off pieces by lazer cuts or whatever the hell they do? i dont think i would want such a big chip in a laptop, takes up way too much space
    IMO that is some pretty poor reasoning. Takes up too much space? Seriously? Are you the one designing and building the laptop? No, they are prebuilt with all space considerations already taken into account... What do you expect, it will prevent you from installing an extra memory stick or two? Maybe there won't be room for that TEC?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jowy Atreides View Post
    Beating down on someone you shall never meet, who will never have any relation to your power of choice in your physical life with vigour and distaste.

    You're all very mature people.

    As much as all your 'talking' matters (which is nought considering none of you have responsibility for nvidia) why would a light-hearted and whimsical post emotionally influence you in a NEGATIVE manner?

    Unless you have emotional boundary issues and can't stand the actions of others without trying to assert control.
    Well dad, how about the quote in your signature? That sure is a mature and unbiased reflection of yourself.
    Last edited by ElSel10; 05-25-2010 at 01:21 PM.
    i7 920 D0 / Asus Rampage II Gene / PNY GTX480 / 3x 2GB Mushkin Redline DDR3 1600 / WD RE3 1TB / Corsair HX650 / Windows 7 64-bit

  16. #41
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by zanzabar View Post
    wasnt this a cut down gf100, if it is a new chip that is not just a cut down gf100 then i take my comment back
    It is a mobile GPU, and all mobile GPUs are a form of cut down version of their respective desktop GPU. But you shouldn't mix it with a full blown desktop GPU and call it "castrated". It is a new chip based on the Fermi-architecture. It is very simple, and shouldn't need any explanation, actually.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  17. #42
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by zanzabar View Post
    wasnt this a physically cut down gf100, if it is a new chip that is not just a gf100 with parts disabled then i take my comment back, also its gddr3 so the 256bit bus is not an advantage over a 128bit gddr5
    AFACT this is a castrated GF100, in other words, not a new chip. It's using GDDR5 and I actually think that it will be faster than the Mobile Radeon 5870, but not by a huge margin.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  18. #43
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    HD5870M gives you the horsepower of a desktop HD57xx in 50 W

    really, dont expect a GTX465 with core/shader clock reduced from 607/1215 mhz to 425/850 mhz to be very fast and power efficient

  19. #44
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Mi
    Posts
    1,063
    is it dx11 compatable..?

  20. #45
    Banned Movieman...
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmore View Post
    AFACT this is a castrated GF100, in other words, not a new chip. It's using GDDR5 and I actually think that it will be faster than the Mobile Radeon 5870, but not by a huge margin.
    its not using GDDR5, its using GDDR3 for the fifth time. how many times do we have to say this. just go look at the memory bandwidth

    1200 Mhz mem clock
    76.8 GB/sec

    you do the math and it = gddr3

  21. #46
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Helmore View Post
    AFACT this is a castrated GF100, in other words, not a new chip. It's using GDDR5 and I actually think that it will be faster than the Mobile Radeon 5870, but not by a huge margin.
    It doesn't need to be hugely better, a little better would do!

    Of course it is based on Fermi-architecture, what else would you expecting? but what would qualify as a a new chip in your book? Do you want a new architecture, gf15000 to call it new chip? This is not a desktop chip, it is a new Mobile chip.
    Last edited by Sam_oslo; 05-25-2010 at 01:34 PM.

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  22. #47
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,696
    Quote Originally Posted by Xoulz View Post
    is it dx11 compatable..?
    No, DX11 does not exist. Nothing supports it.



































    Workstation:
    3960X | 32GB G.Skill 2133 | Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    3*EVGA GTX580 HC2 3GB | 3*Dell U3011
    4*Crucial M4 256GB R0 | 6*3TB WD Green R6
    Areca 1680ix-24 + 4GB | 2*Pioneer BDR-205 | Enermax Plat 1500W
    Internal W/C | PC-P80 | G19 | G700 | G27
    Destop Audio:
    Squeezebox Duet | Beresford TC-7520 Caiman modded | NAD M3 | MA RX8 | HD650 | ATH-ES7
    Man Cave:
    PT-AT5000E | TXP65VT30 | PR-SC5509 | PA-MC5500 | MA GX300*2, GXFX*4, GXC350 | 2*BK Monolith+
    Gaming on the go:
    Alienware M18x
    i7 2920XM | 16GB DDR3 1600
    2*6990 | WLED 1080P
    2*Crucial M4 256GB | BD-RW
    BT 375 | Intel 6300 | 330W PSU

    2011 Audi R8 V10 Ibis White ABT Tuned - 600HP

  23. #48
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    371
    Quote Originally Posted by Macadamia View Post
    Hmm, if the way they cut the units are the same...

    0.7x core clock
    ~0.75x memory clock

    So you get 0.8x (max) perf of a GTX 465, which itself like a GTX 285/275 or so...
    GTX260 performance or so?

    It will definitely be the fastest mobile GPU, no thanks to the anemic 128-bit memory interface of Juniper (you can't really clock RAM fast on notebooks). But the gap should be less than expected- about 15-20% more performance? For double the TDP...


    I'm still seeing HP's Envy 15 (if it didn't have that many problems)/17 as the perfect notebook blend for the majority of gamers (who really game)- definitely enough graphics performance, without the heft or uglyness associated with a gaming notebook. These are just gonna sell way more than any Alienware/Clevo, so nVidia really needs a 20-40W lineup on Fermi soon, and hopefully GF104 is (part) of the answer.

    But really, congrats to nVidia on making a 530mm2 chip fit with 100W cooling on a design, and actually selling it! ATI would have a hard time doing that for several reasons.
    Why so? A desktop HD5770 has a TDP of 108W and is about equal to a GTX260 - therefore I don't really see any problems for ATI to match this. I do however doubt they'll do it. The 100W mobile GPU market is minuscule - and then you're probably better off with 2*60W mobility Hd5870 anyway.
    Last edited by Boissez; 05-25-2010 at 01:35 PM.

  24. #49
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Oslo - Norway
    Posts
    2,879
    ^^ The performance and TDP remains to be determined by hands on tests and reviews, but for now nVidia is claiming "Expect the fastest performance and visually-stunning graphics".

    ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
    2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
    Silver Arrow , push/pull
    2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
    GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
    CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
    +
    EVGA SR-2 , A50
    2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
    Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
    3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
    XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
    Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
    SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W

  25. #50
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    371
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam_oslo View Post
    ^^ The performance and TDP remains to be determined by hands on tests and reviews, but for now nVidia is claiming "Expect the fastest performance and visually-stunning graphics".
    TDP is not determined by reviewers. And Nvidia proclaims so many things these days...

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •