Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 50 of 50

Thread: DirectX 11 Games release roadmap "Ohh Nvidia was way off"

  1. #26
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by cowie View Post
    what in the world do you need 380gtx for?you own a drive-in size monitor?
    or just to benchmark get high scores ?
    what makes this site correct on the dates btw?
    notice the ati/amd ads lol the chec grmers site may be WAY OFF no?
    its a bash nv news section witch leaves out another section to read at xs
    Yaa why would people buy 5850 x2/5870 x2/GTX 380 such stupid bunch of people. Amm why do they crossfire/SLi cards anyways

    Huh 5870 costs $349 and 5870 x2 is suppose to cost $500-$600 means one can save $100 and electricity instead of 5870 Crossfire. Why did i buy a 6800 GT instead of a 6600 GT??? You have opened my eyes My stupid new 19 inch 1080P deserves a 6200 so that i can play amm Quake 3 "1080P" on it
    Coming Soon

  2. #27
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    If people considered those A titles, what do people consider games like half life, civilization or hell, even crysis?

  3. #28
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    If people considered those A titles, what do people consider games like half life, civilization or hell, even crysis?
    near death experiences
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James

  4. #29
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    1,100
    Quote Originally Posted by kadozer View Post
    Not hard to confirm yourself Look up all the developer game sites your answers are all there. Can you google?
    lol oh sry your so right about the dates it said ATI2-3monthsAMD...wait let me run out and get vista+ A 400DOLLAR card to get the whole game and its dx11 glory and just wait till those games come out wait by then knowing ati and its deprecation the card will be worth only 300DOLLAR

    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post
    Yaa why would people buy 5850 x2/5870 x2/GTX 380 such stupid bunch of people. Amm why do they crossfire/SLi cards anyways

    Huh 5870 costs $349 and 5870 x2 is suppose to cost $500-$600 means one can save $100 and electricity instead of 5870 Crossfire. Why did i buy a 6800 GT instead of a 6600 GT??? You have opened my eyes My stupid new 19 inch 1080P deserves a 6200 so that i can play amm Quake 3 "1080P" on it
    first off ayone who has run out and gets a few 5870's does it cus there crasy gamers or benchmarkers and need to have the lastest and greatest to keep up with the jones's(that dont make you a bad guy btw),maybe the 3x 4890's they had before were too running slow..nah

    as for the 58x2 being cheaper that only means that its slower than 5870 in cf,maybe clock speeds or something idk or care about it,what wont a 295 or 48x2 run?thats why you need dx11 or phx to sell with.

    i really think you bought a 68gt because you could not afford an ultra and was just as good
    i was broke back then so i ran 68 nu in sli,it beat my ultra np,but i was only playing m.o.h AA,you know thats when most people were clueless on if the game was gpu or cpu dependant although things were pure for gaming then not selling out left and right like today come on some games have ads in them.
    as for now with little es worried about getting every frame for crysis and fc2 upgradeing for a crappy games like most of the dx11 games we be, its feeding right into there hands
    hell if they came out with a game that really sufferd from:it sucked on playablity,low frames on top end gear,badly coded/loaded with bugs then dropping support for it! BUT if it looked great like a frecking picture it would sell cus all the punk ass es would hypit it up like the second coming,to the point that even people who should know better are taking for a ride.
    _________________

  5. #30
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    If people considered those A titles, what do people consider games like half life, civilization or hell, even crysis?
    A+ and A++ not to mention A+++
    Coming Soon

  6. #31
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    They just can't win, can they? AMD says some games are coming in 3-6 months. nVidia says games are a year out. AMD lists A titles that are out this same year or early the next as proof, and some people go "Oh, no, that doesn't count."
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,554
    Quote Originally Posted by cowie View Post
    lol oh sry your so right about the dates it said ATI2-3monthsAMD...wait let me run out and get vista+ A 400DOLLAR card to get the whole game and its dx11 glory and just wait till those games come out wait by then knowing ati and its deprecation the card will be worth only 300DOLLAR



    first off ayone who has run out and gets a few 5870's does it cus there crasy gamers or benchmarkers and need to have the lastest and greatest to keep up with the jones's(that dont make you a bad guy btw),maybe the 3x 4890's they had before were too running slow..nah

    as for the 58x2 being cheaper that only means that its slower than 5870 in cf,maybe clock speeds or something idk or care about it,what wont a 295 or 48x2 run?thats why you need dx11 or phx to sell with.

    i really think you bought a 68gt because you could not afford an ultra and was just as good
    i was broke back then so i ran 68 nu in sli,it beat my ultra np,but i was only playing m.o.h AA,you know thats when most people were clueless on if the game was gpu or cpu dependant although things were pure for gaming then not selling out left and right like today come on some games have ads in them.
    as for now with little es worried about getting every frame for crysis and fc2 upgradeing for a crappy games like most of the dx11 games we be, its feeding right into there hands
    hell if they came out with a game that really sufferd from:it sucked on playablity,low frames on top end gear,badly coded/loaded with bugs then dropping support for it! BUT if it looked great like a frecking picture it would sell cus all the punk ass es would hypit it up like the second coming,to the point that even people who should know better are taking for a ride.
    Morrowind when modded can bring my GTX280 to it's knees, same with Oblivion, FO3, Stalker, Darkplaces (Quake 1), do I need to go on? Go and play your unmodded console ports on your 8800gt if it makes you feel better about yourself.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    If people considered those A titles, what do people consider games like half life, civilization or hell, even crysis?
    spot on
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    1,100
    ha ha yep but all they have to do with a sucky "A" game is to put a naked chick on the cover and every level she gives you a bj its an A++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ title after that.

    @ bbb
    like i said make a crappy game look good it it will sell and they will mod it
    Last edited by cowie; 10-11-2009 at 09:52 AM.
    _________________

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Motiv View Post
    Nvidia are basically right in saying you wont be seeing DX11 games for about a year. The ones before then are basically the exception to that rule. Even some of those ones are basically DX10 games with a little extra zing.
    Ironic Nvidia was sure whoring out the 8800 series exactly for these same reasons for DX10. But when the little guy comes back and has something new to meet DX11 well it's just not needed. I'm sure glad we saw so much come of DX10 oh wait I'm still waiting.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  11. #36
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Toronto ON
    Posts
    566
    Quote Originally Posted by ajaidev View Post



    Source

    Nvidia said 6-12 months, its less than 2-3 months if this road map is true. Nvidia were the hell is the GTX380???
    Quote Originally Posted by cowie View Post
    what in the world do you need 380gtx for?you own a drive-in size monitor?
    or just to benchmark get high scores ?
    what makes this site correct on the dates btw?
    notice the ati/amd ads lol the chec grmers site may be WAY OFF no?
    its a bash nv news section witch leaves out another section to read at xs
    It's AMD leaked slide, what ads did you expext to see on them?
    Beside you can try out the EA Phenomic "BatleForge" for free now.
    Core i7-4930K LGA 2011 Six-Core - Cooler Master Seidon 120XL ? Push-Pull Liquid Water
    ASUS Rampage IV Black Edition LGA2011 - G.SKILL Trident X Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR3 1866
    Sapphire R9 290X 4GB TRI-X OC in CrossFire - ATI TV Wonder 650 PCIe
    Intel X25-M 160GB G2 SSD - WD Black 2TB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache SATA 6
    Corsair HX1000W PSU - Pioner Blu-ray Burner 6X BD-R
    Westinghouse LVM-37w3, 37inch 1080p - Windows 7 64-bit Pro
    Sennheiser RS 180 - Cooler Master Cosmos S Case

  12. #37
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by cowie View Post
    *snipe*
    This pretty much sums up your post.


    It's always funny to see,how some people know better what other people "have to want". If they don't agree they are idiots, spoiled kids, punks, etc...


  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    AMD says some games are coming in 3-6 months. nVidia says games are a year out.
    Well thats really convenient for your posturing to simply spin nvidia as claiming a solid year out rather than 6-12 months, afterall you at least gave a range of 3-6 months for ATI's claim.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  14. #39
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Quote Originally Posted by highoctane View Post
    Well thats really convenient for your posturing to simply spin nvidia as claiming a solid year out rather than 6-12 months, afterall you at least gave a range of 3-6 months for ATI's claim.
    There's no functional difference. Heck, you can give them a couple of extra months if you want and say nVidia is claiming 4-10...they're still on the losing end of the argument.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  15. #40
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Heck, you can give them a couple of extra months if you want and say nVidia is claiming 4-10...they're still on the losing end of the argument.
    lolwut

    4 months is q1 2010

    thats when dx11 titles start coming in
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  16. #41
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Some real die hards in here...

    I've said my piece, and it is accurate. That's enough for me.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  17. #42
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    Games are often susceptible to delays, nVidia might be right and the first REAL DirectX11 games might not come until Feb (DIRT2). Even if Dirt2 is running on time, is it really going to be a DirectX 11 title? or is it going to be a DirectX10 game with a DirectX11 code path to speed things up or add a hard to spot effect?
    BOTH ATi and nVidia are right here, ATi had the optimists view and nVidia were the pessimists view... the truth will lay somewhere between the two...
    John
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Istantinople
    Posts
    1,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Some real die hards in here...

    I've said my piece, and it is accurate. That's enough for me.
    No. You are wrong. But then it's always easy to say what you've just said, when you are totally wrong.
    Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
    INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,597
    Well, I never said I was right, just I see that both ATi and nVidia are right, just they have a glass half full or half empty viewpoint, with nVidia looking at the glass half empty
    Stop looking at the walls, look out the window

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,488
    I'm interested in AVP and Stalker. The rest of the list I don't care about or isn't a specific game.

    I'm waiting to see what Fermi brings to the table. But they better start mass production pretty quick because those two games are enough to make me stop waiting if Nvidia can't get their act together.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    942
    Games like DiRT 2 are nothing but a mess of postprocessing effects that DX9 could have easily done. Performance boost is the only current reason to want DX11 and if a bunch of those games rock dx11 faster than they do in dx10 I'll go order my HD5870 now.

  22. #47
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by cowie View Post
    lol oh sry your so right about the dates it said ATI2-3monthsAMD...wait let me run out and get vista+ A 400DOLLAR card to get the whole game and its dx11 glory and just wait till those games come out wait by then knowing ati and its deprecation the card will be worth only 300DOLLAR


    Why so much whining? You asked if the dates on the slide were accurate yes? I even underlined the part that I quoted and answered. Now you are whining about something new...its like you're just looking for the forum to comfort you. Newsflash : video cards depreciate faster then new cars. Maybe consoles are for you and pc games aren't? Why did you quote me lol?

    Confirm your sour grapes of not having DX 11 to play Dirt2 and AVP here fellas.
    Last edited by kadozer; 10-11-2009 at 02:42 PM.

  23. #48
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,030
    Quote Originally Posted by kadozer View Post
    Confirm your sour grapes of not having DX 11 to play Dirt2 and AVP here fellas.
    Yeah, he's so mad not having DX11 hardware to play non-released DX11 titles
    Are we there yet?

  24. #49
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by Luka_Aveiro View Post
    Yeah, he's so mad not having DX11 hardware to play non-released DX11 titles
    Lol so true, not as funny as a non DX 11 card from Nvidia to even play 1 game Oh wait where's the card

  25. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    41
    Quote Originally Posted by Motiv View Post
    Nvidia are basically right in saying you wont be seeing DX11 games for about a year. The ones before then are basically the exception to that rule. Even some of those ones are basically DX10 games with a little extra zing.
    Not even based on DX10, but DX9. Because the "DX11" games are based on DX9 because they are built for the consoles then ported to PC.

    PC is dying

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •