MMM
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 45 of 45

Thread: Lynnfield 870, 860 and 750

  1. #26
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    There was no way Gulfy was coming to P55 or P57 anyway.

    It's originally a Dual 1366 part. But even its 1366 variant I doubt, seeing as Intel doesn't need anything else right now to keep AMD at bay, at least until late 2010 when Bulldozer finally rears its lazy head.

    Perkam
    It doesn't even need Gulftown, socket 1156 would have been enough...

    Which means it will be a rather boring period ahead with Intel controlling the desktop CPU market at least. AMD can't slash prices much more either or it will sell CPUs without profit. Bulldozer should have arrived early 2010 TBH. :/
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 07-14-2009 at 05:53 AM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    534
    I'm already seeing people buying a Core i5 motherboard with integrated graphics (the video output at least) and a Core i5 Lynnfield (wich has no gpu)...

  3. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,601
    Huh?

  4. #29
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by doompc View Post
    I'm already seeing people buying a Core i5 motherboard with integrated graphics (the video output at least) and a Core i5 Lynnfield (wich has no gpu)...
    P55 and P57 dont have any FDI so there should be no problem. If you want output for clarkdale buy a H or Q chipset.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    534
    @Hornet331, I know that, but try to explain the average guy that a H55 board supports one kind of Core i5 but not another kind of Core i5.

    At Computex I heard a lot of people complaining that you won't be able to have a quad core with integrated graphics.
    Don't try to argue with them that if you don't need a good GPU you probably won't need a quad core cpu.
    The point is that dumb people do this kind of things.

    And this new "simple" naming scheme is very confusing. Two completely diferent processors under the same name will cause a lot of trouble.
    I thought the Clarkdale will be called Core i3 e the Lynnfield Core i5/i7.
    But having Clarkdale and Lynnfield under the Core i5 name just because they have the same thread count is just stupid.
    Last edited by doompc; 07-14-2009 at 06:33 AM.

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    I gotta think the 7-series will be the sweet spot. Isn't the only difference going to be (essentially useless) HT support? I could see 3dmark fiends wanting that but for most people who don't have a need for 8 threads of anything I can't see the 8-series being that popular.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    386
    At Computex I heard a lot of people complaining that you won't be able to have a quad core with integrated graphics.
    is this confirmed? surely not
    Gaming Box:: q6600 @3.0 :: 9800gtx :: Abit IP35 :: 4gb :: 1.4TB :: akasa eclipse :: Win7
    Development:: PhenomII 955BE @3.2 :: 4200 :: asus M4A785 M Evo :: 1.25TB ::Win7
    Media Centre :: q6600 @3.0 :: x1950pro :: asus p35 epu :: 8gb :: 320 GB :: Lc17B :: Win7
    server:: I7 860 :: p55 gd65 :: 3450 :: 8 TB :: 8gb :: Rebel 12 :: server 2008 R2

  8. #33
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    534
    Lynnfield doesn't have integrated GPU like Clarkdale and even if NVIDIA was able to make a chipset for the 1156 platform, it doesn't make sense to put a IGP on the DMI link.

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    eu/hungary/budapest.tmp
    Posts
    1,591
    Quote Originally Posted by Yakyb View Post
    is this confirmed? surely not
    Have you seen the first pics of Clarkdale?
    There's two chips: one 32nm and on a separate die, the IGP and IMC
    at 45nm.Even Clarkdale will only have onboard PCI-e, and no onboard
    IGP. Clarkdale will only come in two-core configurations, no quad-core.
    Lynnfield won't even have that second chip, it will not have on-die,
    neither on-package IGP, the second chip wouldn't even fit under the
    IHS as it is now.

    ---

    Me, unless some good but very processor-intensive game comes out,
    I'll wait for 850, which should be 2.66G 4C/8T, and hopefully closer
    to the $200 mark than the $300.
    Usual suspects: i5-750 & H212+ | Biostar T5XE CFX-SLI | 4GB RAndoM | 4850 + AC S1 + 120@5V + modded stock for VRAM/VRM | Seasonic S12-600 | 7200.12 | P180 | U2311H & S2253BW | MX518
    mITX media & to-be-server machine: A330ION | Seasonic SFX | WD600BEVS boot & WD15EARS data
    Laptops: Lifebook T4215 tablet, Vaio TX3XP
    Bike: ZX6R

  10. #35
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

  11. #36
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Nice Turbo Boost on Clarksfield... 60 - 77% overclocks. Maybe we soon see the return of Turbo button on our comp cases.
    Last edited by RPGWiZaRD; 07-14-2009 at 10:41 AM.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  12. #37
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by RPGWiZaRD View Post
    Personally I hope 860 will allow for easier 4.2~4.3GHz (200 - 205 BCLCK) stable clocks on air than 920.
    Given >4Ghz + is more of a thermal issue for air, unless these run slightly cooler ( doubtfully ) I don't see them exceeding 4 on air. That would be quite optimistic.

    I wish AMD could compete in this segment. The lack of competition is making the market stagnant. Sure gaming wise, PII vs I7 isn't that far apart but in everything else Intel holds a dominating lead. At least it is not as bad as the X2 days ( AMD had a severe monopoly then ) I'm able to stomach the CPU and memory prices at this point but I still think many of these x58 motherboards are way overpriced. I'm also not going to to change sockets over $100 give or take so at that point may as well get the better of the two. I've always spent a fair bit on my boards but Im starting to feel its been a waste as sometimes I feel what more did they really bring to the table.
    Last edited by Chickenfeed; 07-14-2009 at 11:06 AM.
    Feedanator 7.0
    CASE:R5|PSU:850G2|CPU:i7 6850K|MB:x99 Ultra|RAM:8x4 2666|GPU:980TI|SSD:BPX256/Evo500|SOUND:2i4/HS8
    LCD:XB271HU|OS:Win10|INPUT:G900/K70 |HS/F:H115i

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    1,062
    No one know for sure Intel will discontinue 920 when it launches 860 and 870? Cuz it doesn't make any sense to pay the same price for a lower clock 920 over a 870? Btw, does lower TDP allow better overclocking? Let just hope that the 860 will be the new legendary Q6600.

    CPU: Core i7-2600K@4.8Ghz Mobo: Asus Sabertooth P67 Case: Corsair 700D w/ 800D window
    CPU Cooler:
    Corsair H70 w/ 2 GTs AP-15 GPU: 2xGigabyte GTX 670 WindForce OC SLI
    RAM: 2x8GB G.Skill Ripjaws PSU: Corsair AX850W Sound card: Asus Xonar DX + Fiio E9
    HDD:
    Crucial M4 128GB + 4TB HDD Display: 3x30" Dell UltraSharp 3007WFP-HC
    Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 Headphone: Sennheiser HD650

  14. #39
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    1000 Elysian Park Ave
    Posts
    2,669
    $300 for 8 threads? Dang, i might just look for a second hand Q9550.
    i3-8100 | GTX 970
    Ryzen 5 1600 | RX 580
    Assume nothing; Question everything

  15. #40
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Athens, Greece
    Posts
    563
    Hold on a sec and help me out here please because I have fallen behind on the iCore platform. I am still on a Q9550 @ 4.1Ghz and I was wondering if it is worth it to switch to a iCore 7 920 just before it is phased out.

    Is the new socket better/worse? If worse would you buy a 920 now only to have a cheaper entry point on the 1336 platform or would an 850 be a better choice speed wise?
    Hardware :Asus Rampage Extreme, 4870X2 (Crossfire X) EK FC Blocks, CPU Q9550@490FSB/4,180Ghz, RAM 4GB DDR3, Auzentech Prelude X-fi,PSU - Thermaltake Toughpower 1200 Watt,
    3 Loops with TFCs360 and a PA.120.2/DDCs.

  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by JargonGR View Post
    Hold on a sec and help me out here please because I have fallen behind on the iCore platform. I am still on a Q9550 @ 4.1Ghz and I was wondering if it is worth it to switch to a iCore 7 920 just before it is phased out.

    Is the new socket better/worse? If worse would you buy a 920 now only to have a cheaper entry point on the 1336 platform or would an 850 be a better choice speed wise?
    But Core i7 920 won't be phased out until sometime next year.
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  17. #42
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by iTravis View Post
    No one know for sure Intel will discontinue 920 when it launches 860 and 870? Cuz it doesn't make any sense to pay the same price for a lower clock 920 over a 870? Btw, does lower TDP allow better overclocking? Let just hope that the 860 will be the new legendary Q6600.
    I for one might be tempted to choose an 860 or 870 and a P57 board over a 920 because of Braidwood. If it is out on schedule and if performance is as high as promised i.e. real world performance almost equal to current MLC SSDs when paired with a couple of HDDs in RAID 0 then it might make the P57 platform a better option for more frugal enthusiasts.

  18. #43
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    33
    Am I the only one that doesn't like that core i7 is a two-socket platform? Intel really just put out too many too similar chips. Their options were to make all of socket 1156 Core i5, and have Core i5 Lynnfield be very similar in performance to core i7 Nehalam, or to make Lynnfield Core i7 and have Core i7 be on two different platforms. Eww.
    DFI Lanparty DK T3eh6 || Intel Core i7 920 D0 || 6GB OCZ Platinum || EVGA GTX285 || Corsair TX850 || CoolerMaster CM690 || Windows 7 x64

    Swiftech MCR320 || 3x Yate Loon High Speed || Laing DDC 3.2 || Enzotech Sapphire

  19. #44
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    3,766
    Quote Originally Posted by geo View Post
    if thats correct, is HT worth another $90 ?
    it could make a 30% difference with the right software.

  20. #45
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by GAR View Post
    it could make a 30% difference with the right software.
    or more, CFD apps just love HT (~60% more performance between HT on/off)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •