Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 75

Thread: Shanghai can now be purchased!

  1. #26
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    CIne10 and PovRay are toy benchmarks and have zero importance(name me one accepted and widely used app based on povray and cine10 engine).
    The rest is OK and a healthy bump in both perf. and lower power draw.

    thanks for posting this

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    510
    Quote Originally Posted by Titan7171 View Post
    ok so single shanghai at 2.7ghz is about equal to 3.3ghz agena? + 50w idle, 98.5w load?
    It's 7.3% faster clock for clock versus the 2.3GHz Opteron 2356 and Cinebench scales almost perfectly with clockspeed. Is your Agena score with 64-bit Cinebench?

  3. #28
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    AMD Opteron 2384 2.7ghz 45nm
    AMD Opteron 2356 2.3ghz 65nm

    Is this correct? Also what speed does the Xeon L540 run at?

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    167
    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    AMD Opteron 2384 2.7ghz 45nm
    AMD Opteron 2356 2.3ghz 65nm

    Is this correct? Also what speed does the Xeon L540 run at?
    2.66ghz 45nm

  5. #30
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    CIne10 and PovRay are toy benchmarks and have zero importance(name me one accepted and widely used app based on povray and cine10 engine).
    The rest is OK and a healthy bump in both perf. and lower power draw.

    thanks for posting this
    you can still compare your own systems performance. I dont have alot of those benchmarks so this is the one Im using for my own reference, thats why Im comparing my score.
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  6. #31
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Titan7171 View Post
    ok so single shanghai at 2.7ghz is about equal to 3.3ghz agena? + 50w idle, 98.5w load?
    shanghai and barcelona are server. agena and deneb are desktop.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by accord99 View Post
    It's 7.3% faster clock for clock versus the 2.3GHz Opteron 2356 and Cinebench scales almost perfectly with clockspeed. Is your Agena score with 64-bit Cinebench?
    That's with an app that showed nearly no improvement going from K8 to K10(single core scores).It uses scalar SSE to benchmark the CPU and is intel "tuned"(they even use it to show off 45nm Penryn and Nehalem gen if chips)

  8. #33
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    shanghai and barcelona are server. agena and deneb are desktop.
    I know this but are the clocks/test results comparable between desktop and server?
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by Titan7171 View Post
    I know this but are the clocks/test results comparable between desktop and server?
    im not sure but i wouldn't say so because of different ram and because the opteron chips are better than phenoms. but really i have no idea.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    im not sure but i wouldn't say so because of different ram and because the opteron chips are better than phenoms. but really i have no idea.
    ok cool I guess someone who knows will chime in.......off to play some left4dead
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  11. #36
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Opteron systems use slower memory. They top out with DDR2-667 ECC Registered.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Opteron systems use slower memory. They top out with DDR2-667 ECC Registered.
    The Shanghai core Opterons will support the DDR2-800 ECC Registered standard.

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...C%20registered

  13. #38
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliverda View Post
    The Shanghai core Opterons will support the DDR2-800 ECC Registered standard.

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...C%20registered
    ECC registered is slow compared to desktop. at 800mhz the timings are like 5-5-5-18 and 6-6-6-24.

    error correcting check < thats what ECC (I think)
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    ECC registered is slow compared to desktop. at 800mhz the timings are like 5-5-5-18 and 6-6-6-24.

    error correcting check < thats what ECC (I think)
    yea ecc registered ram is built for stability.

  15. #40
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    CIne10 and PovRay are toy benchmarks and have zero importance(name me one accepted and widely used app based on povray and cine10 engine).
    The rest is OK and a healthy bump in both perf. and lower power draw.

    thanks for posting this
    I am using Cinema 4D as of now. But I'm using the vRay renderer so it doesn't count
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    so are they launching BD soon or a comic book?

  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    1,209
    opteron will be clocked slower as well, or deneb will be clocked higher then shanghai the other way round. remember the thermal stress in server racks and the much higher need for reliability in the server section..
    1. ASUS Sabertooth 990fx | FX 8320 || 2. DFI DK 790FXB-M3H5 | X4 810
    8GB Samsung 30nm DDR3-2000 9-10-10-28 || 4GB PSC DDR3-1333 6-7-6-21
    Corsair TX750W | Sapphire 6970 2GB || BeQuiet PurePower 450w | HD 4850
    EK Supreme | AC aquagratix | Laing Pro | MoRa 2 || Aircooled

  17. #42
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside an AS355F2
    Posts
    414
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Nehalem gen if chips)

    That's the best one I've seen yet.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Opteron systems use slower memory. They top out with DDR2-667 ECC Registered.
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliverda View Post
    The Shanghai core Opterons will support the DDR2-800 ECC Registered standard.

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...C%20registered
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    ECC registered is slow compared to desktop. at 800mhz the timings are like 5-5-5-18 and 6-6-6-24.

    error correcting check < thats what ECC (I think)
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    yea ecc registered ram is built for stability.
    Quote Originally Posted by Oese View Post
    opteron will be clocked slower as well, or deneb will be clocked higher then shanghai the other way round. remember the thermal stress in server racks and the much higher need for reliability in the server section..
    so because of all these reasons you could say that Opterons are kinda krippled just to be server stable.

    well between the memory increase going from 667/800 to 1066 for Deneb, the clock for clock increase, the increase in total clocks (2.7 vs 3.0ghz) + overclocking we should see very nice increases overall
    AMD 1090T@4.0ghz
    Enzotech sapphire/Mo-Ra extreme rad
    Asus Crosshair IV Formula
    ht 2400mhz / nb 2400mhz
    12gb Gskill 1300mhz
    HIS HD5970
    Enermax Evo Galaxy 1250
    case: XCLIO A380PLUS-BK

    4.61ghz water

    4.5ghz superpi 1M 15.585
    http://i271.photobucket.com/albums/j...rpi4500mhz.jpg
    25,396 06 Phenom 965@ 4.4ghz HIS 5970@960/1260
    21,893 Vantage, Phenom 965 4.2ghz HIS 5970 @960/1260

    Phenom 2 125w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=117414
    Phenom 2 140w 965 test results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...d.php?t=109214
    Phenom 2 AM2+ 940 cold air results
    http://futuremark.yougamers.com/foru...ad.php?t=97430

    If I dont get every single drop out of my cpu I feel like someone is stealing from me

  19. #44
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by Titan7171 View Post
    so because of all these reasons you could say that Opterons are kinda krippled just to be server stable.

    well between the memory increase going from 667/800 to 1066 for Deneb, the clock for clock increase, the increase in total clocks (2.7 vs 3.0ghz) + overclocking we should see very nice increases overall
    there where benchmarks done with Barcelona and 8800 GTX on a sever with 677mhz ECC.

    http://www.anandtech.com/printarticle.aspx?i=3092

    it us to have a 3dmark numbers too. :/

    I think it scored around 9,00 points and a phenom scored around 9,800 10,250.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  20. #45
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,260
    The TDP is only 75w I wonder what stock vcore is for these CPUs

    Wonder what kind of speeds they would get out of a 140w Deneb
    --->TeamPURE<---

  21. #46
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,128
    Quote Originally Posted by demonkevy666 View Post
    ECC registered is slow compared to desktop. at 800mhz the timings are like 5-5-5-18 and 6-6-6-24.

    error correcting check < thats what ECC (I think)
    Just to let people know that memory isn't that crucial with bigger CPU caches. And with wider memory controller the timings become more important rather than the frequency. Also, 800 MHz CAS 4 is slower(only due to the lower bandwidth available, actual CAS latency stays the same) than 1200MHz with CAS 6 or 1600 MHz with CAS 8.

    Quote Originally Posted by knopflerbruce View Post
    The TDP is only 75w I wonder what stock vcore is for these CPUs

    Wonder what kind of speeds they would get out of a 140w Deneb
    Yet this is their first launched 45nm batch, thus I assume they have room to improve, quite a bit.

  22. #47
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Of course, a dual-socket system also has the benefit of running two memory controllers. One bank for each CPU generally.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  23. #48
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    63
    informal, I agree povray is a bit of a toy benchmark, but CineBench?
    I thought Cinebench was from one of the most popular rendering programmes?
    If so I wouldn't call it minor. Optimising for SSE isnt just optimising for intel either, the Opterons do run certains subsets of of SSE faster than their intel equivalents(or they definitely did vs P4 even though intel came up with them, not sure about Conroe etc)AFAIK.

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    288
    Quote Originally Posted by knopflerbruce View Post
    The TDP is only 75w I wonder what stock vcore is for these CPUs

    Wonder what kind of speeds they would get out of a 140w Deneb

    I believe that the 75W number is actually for ACP so true TDP is something like 110W or something like that.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by qurious63ss View Post
    I believe that the 75W number is actually for ACP so true TDP is something like 110W or something like that.
    105W ACP = 125W TDP
    75W ACP = 95W TDP
    55W ACP = 68W TDP

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •