25sec SP 1M with Opteron 146 on water !!!

[HARDCORECLOCKER]

And here's the 32M :

[Zeus]

BH-5 is nice but TCCD is as good for SuperPi:



If only this ram would allow me to run trcd@3...

[M.Beier]

BH-5 is nice but TCCD is as good for SuperPi:



If only this ram would allow me to run trcd@3...

Nope they aint..

EDIT:
Is that a WinXP 64bit?? - Looks like the std. background - If it is, thats why, 64bit XP gives a slightly better time..

[Zeus]

They aint?
Care to elaborate?

It's just plane XP pro w/ SP2, background is one of those apple wallpapers.

[funkflix]

U can touch BH5 in SPi, if u have a 27Mhz plus with the TCCD, but only with 2.5-3-3-5 and really tight subtimings.





Edit: Sure with 2.5-4-3-7 too, but u need much higher clocks.

[HARDCORECLOCKER]

And IMO BH-5 is easier to handle - tight the timings and bump the voltage, that's all.

TCCD is a bit more tricky and takes more time to find perfect settings.

[msimax]

./.

[HARDCORECLOCKER]

./.

+

[Gautam]

Your OS untweaked? Did you try max mem 104? Seems a tiny bit slow. Wait whats all that crap in your task bar?

I have an extremely dumb question. What did you do to get that font?

For some reason my daily XP install has the same weird font, and scores unnaturally well in SuperPi.

Neways some rippin clocks and times in here, nice job all of you.

[afireinside]

Haha I have no idea. I just set windows appearance to best performance and off I went.

[Mr.President]

And IMO BH-5 is easier to handle - tight the timings and bump the voltage, that's all.

TCCD is a bit more tricky and takes more time to find perfect settings.

I don´t think so, i have much more problems with my BH6 because the 166 diver worked only with 1 of some CPUs. I had never troubles with my Tccd they allways worked fine with 308 2,5-3-3

[HARDCORECLOCKER]

Maybe it's the same old question like the one if INTEL or AMD is the better chip..........

[C_B]

great
the same time as my little 30$ Pentium M ...