Is there a great difference in temps between a solid copper container and an aluminum one?
Is there a great difference in temps between a solid copper container and an aluminum one?
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
GSkill F2-8000CL DDR2-1000 2x2GB
Abit IP35 Pro
XFX NVidia GeForce 6800GT @ 435/1210Mhz
2x WD Raptor 36GB RAID 0
Antec TruePower Quattro 1000w
Windows Vista Ultimate x64
The difference is mainly when dealing with loaded temps and with the X2 kicking out a fair bit of heat then i'd go for copper if you get the chance
Pentium M database:
http://www.wwwwwoc.net/db1.htm
Originally Posted by marvt74
Well, the chance is all money...So we'll see.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
GSkill F2-8000CL DDR2-1000 2x2GB
Abit IP35 Pro
XFX NVidia GeForce 6800GT @ 435/1210Mhz
2x WD Raptor 36GB RAID 0
Antec TruePower Quattro 1000w
Windows Vista Ultimate x64
Aluminum is good if you can't afford copper but it kind of sucks at high loads. A properly designed solid alumi unit will hold a load fine, my units hold -61c and -66c but a copper would hold the load closer to the idle. My units idle -70 and -73c. The 2.25" and 3" mousepots that is.
Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250
thate is nice to know , thane i will go for copper has well
are the temperatures overall that much lower with copper, or is the main benefit in the idle-load variation?
Cheers,
Kenny
______
Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.
Some people say that with cryo temps you achieve more load then copper.. to bad this isnt tested "on our oc world"
*EDITed by IFMU*
Signature Removed by XS Staff for not following XS Policies
Forum Policies
so theres a series of decisions based on common sense and probability, but no real testing done? Surely someones had a fun day of checking the differences??
Kenny
______
Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.
Well if you could make solid units to testIts allmost a no job to do that and test every unit we make.
*EDITed by IFMU*
Signature Removed by XS Staff for not following XS Policies
Forum Policies
LOL I cant afford both, so buying a tube of any kind will be an achievement.
My wallet says alu tube, but if the temperature differences are that big, my head says copper. May as well buy quality if it`ll benefit the clocks.
______
Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.
YGPM
Last edited by Highland3r; 03-12-2006 at 08:34 AM.
.:. X2 @ 2.9 .:. E6600 L628 @ 4.73 .:. AB9 @ 512 FSB .:. E6300 @ 100% OC Stable
U.K. overclockers: Represent your country, bench for EP-UK! Unite and show the world there IS a U.K. scene!
Kenny you could use the Team UK tube if you want for cheapness aslong as its ok with SoddemFX
Pentium M database:
http://www.wwwwwoc.net/db1.htm
Doh! yea I forgot about that! LOL Highlander has a similar idea, wont say any more its up to him to say as much as he wants. Might ask Soddem for a loan an see how I get on. Been thinking of moving to DI over my Mach for lower temps so would prob wanna buy one eventually. Will ask him. Cheers!
K
______
Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.
Ok i've got the Team UK one atm but can easily send it you.
You could use my gpu tube aswell if you wanted to use that
Pentium M database:
http://www.wwwwwoc.net/db1.htm
ok. I`ll see about sourcing DI for a couple weekends time and let ya know? Is that ok?
Cheers!
K
______
Sometimes, it's not your time. Sometimes, you have to make it your time. Sometimes, it can ONLY be your time.
Aye if you want to add me to MSN or something it might be in my profile i might be able to give you a few numbers
Pentium M database:
http://www.wwwwwoc.net/db1.htm
Esto es correcto a 25°C. Cuando baja la temperatura la conductividad termica de los materiales sube.* diamant: 1000 - 2600 W/mK
* silver : 429 W/mK
* Copper : 385 W/mK
* gold: 320 W/mK
* aluminium: 229 W/mK (205?)
* platina: 70 W/mK
* steell: 42,9 W/mK
* lood: 34,7 W/mK
* kwik: 8,3 W/mK
* kwarts: 8 W/mK
* ice: 1,6 W/mK
* glas: 0,8 W/mK
* wood: 0,04 ÃÂ:banana: 0,12 W/mK
* asbest: 0,09 W/mK
* aërogel: ca 0.017 W/mK
higher is better in our case and the difference is big
Revisen este enlace por favor (pagina 4): http://personales.ya.com/universal/T...DFs/Tablas.pdf
Es importante destacar ademas que no solo el material interviene en la temperatura final del sistema, pues importa mucho el diseño termico y la superficie de contacto entre el fluido y el tubo. La superficie de contacto es lo que mas ayuda a transferir el calor, y es por esto que los disipadores tienen aletas unidas a una base.
Estas aletas ademas deben tener una relacion entre el espesor y la altura que dependera de la capacidad del fluido para absorber el calor y de las condiciones de agitacion (turbulencia) de este mismo. Tambien tiene que ver con la cantidad de refrigerante que viaje a travez de las aletas.
De este modo, el material es solo un factor secundario en la construccion de un tubo para hielo seco o para nitrogeno liquido. Importa mucho mas su superficie de contacto, la forma de las aletas, el espesor de la base y la distancia maxima entre aletas y foco de calor. Esto se puede lograr conmayor exito en un tubo de 2 piezas. Hay buenas tecnicas para soldar cobre y aluminio sin que la soldadura quede debil o que se pueda quebrar con el frio
Saludos
Now, I' m Projected my first Container in ALUMINIU to DRY ICE.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
