Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Which Cpu would you rather have

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    1,544

    Which Cpu would you rather have

    Opteron is a little less money. but which cpu for these needs, Playing computer games, and maybe using the interenet. I don't use any other programs. I always thought if im not multi tasking, ever then I dont need dual core. I know I can get a really good over clock with that opteron 150 and from I have heard a single core right now works better with current games then a lowered clocked dual core cpu.

    Opteron 150
    2.4ghz http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...93#DetailSpecs

    Opteron 165:
    1.8ghz
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103588


    guys please explain when you answer why one over another.
    Current Setup:
    -9850 GX2's in Quad SLI config
    -Asus P5N32-SLI MB
    -2x512mb of PC2-5300 DDR2
    -Intel Celeron D OC'd to 3.2Ghz
    -Windows Me with XP theme
    -WD Caviar 20GB Hard Drive
    -Zip drive
    -Jazz drive
    -3.5" floppy drive
    -5.25" floppy drive

  2. #2
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Tel Aviv, Israel
    Posts
    1,151
    If you are going to be running both at stock speeds, and strictly gaming/browsing web and not ANYTHING else, go for the 150 Opty. But if you have overclocking in mind or you will be doing things like burning CD/DVDs and doing other things simultaniously I'd get the 165.
    Its really easy to say that all you'll ever do with a computer is browse the web or play games, but rarely that actually happens and you end up doing a lot more with your PC than just those two things. It is also very nice to be able to do a lot of things at once without lag, so keep all that in mind when you decide.

    Also if you want your CPU to last I'd get a Dual Core. if you're going to upgrade in a few months to a year and not OC, then get the Single Core.

    If you were to ask me personally what would I chose, I'd go for the dual core, as its more future-proof, its very overclockable, I do more than just game or do one single heavy task at one time. In addition the extra 200MHz (after OCing either chip) you may gain by going single core will not increase your gaming performance by much, plus you'll lose some performance compared to dual cores where one core can be dedicated to the game, while the other will be dedicated to everything else running in the background.
    Last edited by The Coolest; 01-12-2006 at 04:50 AM.
    Member of Overclockers.com Folding @ Home team
    "<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
    Main rig:
    AMD Ryzen 7 2700X / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
    Secondary rigs:
    Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
    Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.

    Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    daytona beach florida
    Posts
    755
    save yourself some money and get a 148 opty.
    Q6600 L723A (400 x9)
    Evga 780i P02
    G.skill 8 GB
    Evga GTX 280
    Raptor X (3) 150's Raid 0
    Targen BZ 1100w
    Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120
    Vista Ultimate x64
    Xclio

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    1,434
    I would get the 165 regardless espec if you are one of those poeple who dont upgrade for a while or multitask a bit.

    It is a good investment

  5. #5
    Love and Peace!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    hiding somewhere!
    Posts
    3,675
    Quote Originally Posted by The Coolest
    If you are going to be running both at stock speeds, and strictly gaming/browsing web and not ANYTHING else, go for the 150 Opty.
    why even bother with an opteron if you don't oc?
    Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    MANCHESTER - UK
    Posts
    471
    Personally if i had to choose, I would take the opteron 165 over the opteron 150.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA USA
    Posts
    183
    I'm actually getting more use out of my 2.6ghz 175 opty then I could ever hope to get out of a fx55-57 @ 3.6ghz. In Q4 the dual core option blows fx55-57 out of the water. I can log 2 characters on WoW at the same time with ease, it used to make the 2nd client LAG horribly since each takes 100% cpu usage even out of fx55 but now they each only take 1/2 :P and can shrink/encrypt/unrar etc. without sweat. Dual core is the way to go imo. There will be alot more games supporting it also with the release of the fx60 and also the sm2 in the future there will be alot of dual core, the games have to support the dual core demanad. Just my 2c

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Durham University, UK
    Posts
    1,143
    Opty 165 2 WIN
    The rig
    CPUs: E6300 ES B0 @ 3220 MHz w/1.35v orthos stable | E6600 B2 @ 3400 MHz w/1.43v --> Sold | Xeon 3050 L2 @ 3304 MHz w/1.45v orthos stable
    MoBo: Asus P5K-E WiFi-AP @ 520 x * orthos stable
    Graphics: 256 MB Connect 3D Radeon X1900XT @ 661/828 (core/mem)
    RAM: 2 x 1 GB Team Xtreem PC2 5300 @ DDR1010 4-4-4-8 / DDR1100 5-5-5-12 w/2.25v orthos stable
    HDDs: 300 GB (16 MB Cache) and 80 GB Maxtor Diamondmax 10 drives
    Optical: NEC ND3500AG DVD +/- RW
    PSU: Antec True Power 2.0 550W
    H2O
    Swiftech MCR220-QP | Laing D5 | AquaXtreme MP-05 Pro LE | DangerDen Maze 4 LP | 2 x 120mm NoiseBlocker SX1 fans
    Lappy
    MSI MS1022 14.1" Widescreen Barebone | Celeron-M 360 1.4 GHz @ 1.86 GHz / Pentium M 715A | GeForce 6200 Go | 80 GB Fujitsu HDD | Sony DVD +/- RW
    Waiting for
    Nehalem

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    343
    Dual core !!

    I dont really multi task much and was a little hesitant of getting one myself.. But now even though im only running @ 2600mhz it feels just as fast as my sandy at 2800mhz.. Dual cores just make things feel so much smoother..

    Now im thinking of getting a 170 or 175..lol.. geez it never ends..

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    USA, Vermont
    Posts
    1,061
    I just had to make a choice something like that and i took the dual core way...most dual cores clock over 2.55 and really the only thing you ned anything faster for is benching 01se pretty much some are reacheing 2.7-2.8 like mine on air other are in the 2,9-3.0 range with water...

    i would go dual core in the next 2-3 months games will use dual cores and a 2.2 dual will be better that a 3ghz single..

    dragon
    http://smbach.com/mad.gif

    Opty 175 Rig
    Lian-Li PC75B case, Thermaltake BT w/ 165 CFM delta fan, Enermax 550watt PSU (36A on 12+), x1950 Pro, DFI Lanparty NForce 4 Ultra-d (moded for SLI so that i can use the second slot at 8x), Opteron 175 CCBWE 0547 TMPW (2.80, 280x10, 1.5 volts), 2x1gb Mushkin Redline xp4000 (280 3-3-2-8, 2.65 volts), 80GB WD

    AM3 Rig
    Lian-Li PC-75b case, Asus Crosshair III Formula, 965 x4 C3 @ 4.1 1.525 volts 2.8 NB 1.25 volts, 2x2gb Dominator GT Cas 8 2000Mhz@ 1720 6-6-5-18-22 1.725 volts, Asus 5770 VT @1010/1435, Seasonic 850watt PSU 2x12v rails 40 amps each, 36GB raptor boot drive, 80GB WD storage drive, HeatKiller LT cpu block, BI GTX 360 with 6x Scythe 3000RPM fans in push/pull, MCP 655 variable pump on setting 5, EK 150ml res, all 1/2 inch

    DFI NF4 BIOS Guide

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    U.K.
    Posts
    1,171
    yeah, i love my dual core...

    since trying one, i couldn't go back to using a single core cpu full time
    i love the fact that i can finally use true multitasking

    with a single core, if i wanted to do anything cpu intensive, the pc would be essentially rendered unuseable until the task had finished
    dual core changed all that, now i can encode a home movie while surfing the net, writing email, listening to mp3's and burning a dvd, all without a hitch or stutter

    gaming performance ain't too bad either
    i950 (3035B684)
    Gigabyte EX58A-UD3R
    3x4GB G.Skill PC3-12800 7-8-7-24
    HIS Radeon HD 6970 2GB & Dell 3007WFP-HC
    Asus Xonar DX
    128GB C300, Velociraptor & Sammy F3's
    Corsair AX850W
    Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA USA
    Posts
    183
    Quote Originally Posted by Pyr0

    gaming performance ain't too bad either


    Gaming performance is AWESOME if you have a game like Q4 that can use both cores. Just knowing that in the future more games will be lilke that should be enough to make anyone wanna get out of single core. Gonna be IMPOSSIBLE for any single core processor to beat a dual core opty/x2/fx60+ at or around 3ghz if the game can use both cores.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    1,544
    Quote Originally Posted by Ampz
    Gaming performance is AWESOME if you have a game like Q4 that can use both cores. Just knowing that in the future more games will be lilke that should be enough to make anyone wanna get out of single core. Gonna be IMPOSSIBLE for any single core processor to beat a dual core opty/x2/fx60+ at or around 3ghz if the game can use both cores.
    I have Quake 4 what are you talking about 2 characters I must be missing some thing with that.

    From the looks of it though EVERY ONE said duel core so their must be a reason for this I have an opteron 148 that does 3ghz stable I dont think it would be worth selling it though for say 200.00 and spending another 150.00 or so for a 165. I just don't think i would ever see a difference in performance and it would be a hastle and I would be out some money. I will probably hold on to this 148 for awhile im pretty happy with it. I just like upgrading.
    Current Setup:
    -9850 GX2's in Quad SLI config
    -Asus P5N32-SLI MB
    -2x512mb of PC2-5300 DDR2
    -Intel Celeron D OC'd to 3.2Ghz
    -Windows Me with XP theme
    -WD Caviar 20GB Hard Drive
    -Zip drive
    -Jazz drive
    -3.5" floppy drive
    -5.25" floppy drive

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Silicon Valley, CA
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by Daveb2012
    I have Quake 4 what are you talking about 2 characters I must be missing some thing with that.

    From the looks of it though EVERY ONE said duel core so their must be a reason for this I have an opteron 148 that does 3ghz stable I dont think it would be worth selling it though for say 200.00 and spending another 150.00 or so for a 165. I just don't think i would ever see a difference in performance and it would be a hastle and I would be out some money. I will probably hold on to this 148 for awhile im pretty happy with it. I just like upgrading.
    you easily have a chance of overclocking that 165 to 2.7 if not more and that right there would equal your 148 in gaming and would be much faster in everything else

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
    Posts
    1,175
    This is an easy choice

    Quote Originally Posted by `SippY
    you easily have a chance of overclocking that 165 to 2.7 if not more and that right there would equal your 148 in gaming and would be much faster in everything else
    Exactly what I was going to say
    Wolfdale e8400es @4.5Ghz / Ultra-120 Extreme
    2GB Ballistix @ 589Mhz 4-4-4-x @ 2.5V - SPI 32M
    *** Motherboards tested: DFI Blood Iron (current), Asus P5K3-dlx, DFI P965-S, P5B-Dlx, DFI RD600, Bad Axe 2, EVGA 680i, DS3 and P5W DH ***
    Fan modded Zippy 850W, 500GB 7200.11 and EVGA 8800GTX @678/1062

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •