"WR" First to break 300mhz 2-2-2-5!!Old bh5 Powa!!Super pi1m

[psy^]

Man this is insane :O

But why only a 27sec run?
@ 3ghz with 2-2-2-5 300mhz memory i thought you'd be closer to 25sec

[Lastviking]

Man this is insane :O

But why only a 27sec run?
@ 3ghz with 2-2-2-5 300mhz memory i thought you'd be closer to 25sec

The only i have seen that take 24.9 amd is a 3.3ghz ,and 2x256 is slower than 2x512mb. Do any have 2x256mb tccd that can try 10x300 2.5-x-x-x for me (easyer to compare then)

[s7e9h3n]

The only i have seen that take 24.9 amd is a 3.3ghz ,and 2x256 is slower than 2x512mb. Do any have 2x256mb tccd that can try 10x300 2.5-x-x-x for me (easyer to compare then)

I've got one with 2x512mb TCCD if you want to see it.........

[Lastviking]

I've got one with 2x512mb TCCD if you want to see it.........

k show it + what windows are you using?,2x512 will be faster but it beter than nothing.

[s7e9h3n]

FX55 + GSkill 2x512mb 4800FF
Unoptimized Win2k3

[s7e9h3n]

Actually, if you like, I can run it again right now and just turn bank interleaving off in bios......

EDIT: I just went ahead and turned off BI so here's the result:

[cdelong]

I'm happy to just hit DDR600 at any timings. I tried 6-3-3-2 and corrupted windows. it would just keep rebooting no matter what I did.

I can only dream of those timings at DDR600

[Moso]

@ S7e9h3n,

What is the WR for AMD SuperPi 1m on air ???

[s7e9h3n]

@ S7e9h3n,

What is the WR for AMD SuperPi 1m on air ???

I'm not sure, but I think it's around 24-25 seconds......and that was done in sub-zero outside air temps....

[Lastviking]

Actually, if you like, I can run it again right now and just turn bank interleaving off in bios......

EDIT: I just went ahead and turned off BI so here's the result:

Thx for info i think i will try win2k3 instead of WinXp easyer to compare then. But my time is already faster than 2x512 tccd with bank interleaving on so my time is not to bad but i can be faster.

[Moso]

@ S7e9h3n

I think it's 24.953 sec by Dani in this thread :

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...t=67058&page=7

[Lastviking]

Found something win2k3 give about 0.300+ faster time than WinXp Sp2 could not test @ 300mhz+ today but i compared 10x300(183 divider(273 on the sticks))

[s7e9h3n]

Found something win2k3 give about 0.300+ faster time than WinXp Sp2 could not test @ 300mhz+ today but i compared 10x300(183 divider(273 on the sticks))

Now you understand why we run 2k3 Wouldn't it be kinda hard to compare your 10x300 time to 11x273? First your timings would be very different @ 300 than @ 273. Secondly, it's pretty hard to estimate how much difference in the final time is due to the high FSB, Also, @ x11, you get a better bandwidth efficiency than @ x10......Could it be possible your faster time is due to the ability to run tighter timings? Or did you run the exact same timings on your memory @ 273 as you had @ 300?

[Lastviking]

Now you understand why we run 2k3 Wouldn't it be kinda hard to compare your 10x300 time to 11x273? First your timings would be very different @ 300 than @ 273. Secondly, it's pretty hard to estimate how much difference in the final time is due to the high FSB, Also, @ x11, you get a better bandwidth efficiency than @ x10......Could it be possible your faster time is due to the ability to run tighter timings? Or did you run the exact same timings on your memory @ 273 as you had @ 300?

i did the both run with 10x300(183) in WinXp and Win2k3. Win2k3 give me about 27.000 with 10x300(183) 2x512mb (didnt test 2x256mb), the timings was fair so hard that you had used with your bh5 utt @ 275mhz(its more like my timings with my bh5 @ 300mhz). "I didnt change timings becuse its harder to compare then "

[s7e9h3n]

i did the both run with 10x300(183) in WinXp and Win2k3. Win2k3 give me about 27.000 with 10x300(183) 2x512mb (didnt test 2x256mb), the timings was fair so hard that you had used with your bh5 utt @ 275mhz(its more like my timings with my bh5 @ 300mhz). "I didnt change timings becuse its harder to compare then "

Ok....thanks for clearing that up.....btw, this is the best I can do @ 11x273 -

[corvus_corax]

The only i have seen that take 24.9 amd is a 3.3ghz ,and 2x256 is slower than 2x512mb. Do any have 2x256mb tccd that can try 10x300 2.5-x-x-x for me (easyer to compare then)

In this momment (on my corsair voyager), i have one shot. This was in an unoptimized XP SP2 -without XP theme - I know, my timings are not the best for TCCD (actually i have aother shot with better timings on my 144 )


I hope could be useful

[Xevipiu]

Ok....thanks for clearing that up.....btw, this is the best I can do @ 11x273 -

Mushkin 3500LevelII



TCCD FF

Bye

[s7e9h3n]

Mushkin 3500LevelII

Ummm...what's your point? I was showing LV my fastest 1m time @ 3ghz since he was testing the same with his new install of windows2k3. Yes, your 2x256 sticks do 275 But these 2x512 sticks do 280+ (just haven't tested higher yet) :

[corvus_corax]

My time on 3.0GHz with TCCD 300MHz 2.5-3-3 is very slow...i know. Actually i can almost beat my time with 3GHz but the mems on stock 200MHz (well is 2x512MB, shot here ). For example, my time in a not fully optimized XP SP2 (just with cache the OS Kernel to memory -systemcache=1 and DisableExecutivePaging)


Edit: Awesome memories there s7e9h3n! I need a pair

[FireDragon]

lol srry to dig up an old thread, but that is just INSANE TCCD eat your heart out!!!, 300 mhz on BH-5, just WOW (i was still using BH-5 well UTT bh-5, till about a month ago) when i grabbed these mushkin redlines in my sig

Dragon

[d50man]

wow will they live for another run ... Great job.