Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345
Results 101 to 109 of 109

Thread: The VM Thread

  1. #101
    Ker-Pow !
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,407
    Ah I hadnt seen that product before. Whats it like on memory resources ? Vmware is pretty good if you want to run a lot of VMs and a cpu intensive DC project. Be interesting to see how it performs.

  2. #102
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Southeast Michigan
    Posts
    3
    This is a rough estimate... I have 2 GB of RAM in my rig... sitting at the desktop Commit Charge was 259M. I have two VM's running now, each with 512 MB reserved for them. Now Commit Charge is 1315M. Subtract 1024 for the RAM reserved for the VM's and the 259 that was in use before loading up the VM's and that leaves about 32 MB being used by Virtual Server 2005.

  3. #103
    Xtreme Bandwith Whore
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    2,361
    James if you want VPC, i have it.

  4. #104
    Ker-Pow !
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,407
    Thanks for the offer Haltech but I have it somewhere I think.

  5. #105
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    23
    MS VPC or server for that matter are not exactly the fastest out there. VMwares virtualization is at least 2 years ahead of the competition. Google that info it is readily out there. Also from what I have heard it is not as user friendly but that is up to debate and preferences.

    If you are lookng to run multiple VMs Vmware server is your best bet. It is free now and is more geared for server use. I recommend using a low footprint OS like a nlited windows or Damn Small Linux or even ubuntu to run the VMware server. This should provide a dramatic increase in performance.

  6. #106
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    789
    I see a lot of glossing over exactly which package from vmware.c0m is needed. Currently available are VMPlayer (free, but seems it can only run pre-made proprietary images), VMWare Server 1.0.2 (free), & VMWare Workstation 6 (30-day).
    Which one(s) will work for at least 10 VMs?
    DeXter::2xXeon2.4@3200, GF6800, PC-DL, 1gb Centon, IWT+panaflo air, Win7
    Quad::Q6600(g0)@3400(1.30V), GTX275, 965P-DS3, 4gb HyperX, Asus SilentSquare (air), Win7_64U
    NuQuad::Q9400@3300(1.24V), 8800GT, G31M-ES2L, 2gb Patriot, stock air (bigger Q6600 one), WinXP64
    Crunch::E4300@2400, onboard, GF7100PVT-M3, 2gb Patriot CL5, stock air, Vista64U

  7. #107
    Ker-Pow !
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,407
    Workstation will allow you to create VMs that can be saved to run with VMplayer, as will VMware server. Workstation also allows you to clone the VMs which saves time when creating a VM farm. The downside is that you will need to buy it after 30 days. VMware server will allow you to create the VMs and manage them for free.

    So both workstation and server will do what you require. Both will run in windows and linux. In fact you can download server direct into ubuntu using add remove programs.

  8. #108
    Xtreme D˛OL Watch Dog
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    459
    Workstation also allows you create Teams, with Server you can specify VMs to start automatically when you launch VMWare but can't create Teams.

  9. #109
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,163
    Can anybody suggest me which VM to use? VMware is not free. I'm playing with VirtualBox right now, but I can't make it autostart. Where should I go now? Virtual PC? QEMU? Something else?
    BTW 32 MB is more than enough for XP.
    I'm considering dropping it to 24-26.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •