Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: 300HTT seems to be out of my reach!

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    848

    300HTT seems to be out of my reach!

    Hi all,

    Recently got my new 939 setup from a 754 setup and I took the OCZ Platinum Rev2's from the old rig and into this.

    I couldnt seem to get 270 of of these with the 754 setup but with the older memory controller it wasn't too much of a surprise for that to happen.

    So I was hoping to get these sticks (2*512) to really show their worth and go for 300HTT.

    The processor, a 3800 venice was bought second hand, and the previous owner ran it at 2.7Ghz on about 1.47 volts. He did show me a CPU-Z verified screenshot of it doing 2.9 (242*12) but I dont think it was stable obviously.

    So I think the chip is quite good being able to get to 242HTT on its highest multi?

    However, Ive really played around with my memory timings based from kakaroto DDR600 TCCD guide.

    I keep falling on DFIs Memtest86+ 1.55, test 6 and Ive managed to get the errors down to 46 from within the hundereds.

    The setup to try this was:
    3800 Venice 300HTT , 1.45v (maybe I needed more volts through the CPU?)
    2*512 OCZ Plats Rev2 1:1 1T (2.8v, seemed to like 2.8 more than 2.9volts) Was running Dual Channel in slots 1 and 3 (yellow banks)
    DFI Lanparty NF4 SLI-DR, 6-23 bios
    Hiper Type-R 580w PSU

    Any ideas as to where I may be falling?

    Many thanks

    If it ain't watercooled, I don't wanna know.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by Mekrel
    Hi all,

    Recently got my new 939 setup from a 754 setup and I took the OCZ Platinum Rev2's from the old rig and into this.

    I couldnt seem to get 270 of of these with the 754 setup but with the older memory controller it wasn't too much of a surprise for that to happen.

    So I was hoping to get these sticks (2*512) to really show their worth and go for 300HTT.

    The processor, a 3800 venice was bought second hand, and the previous owner ran it at 2.7Ghz on about 1.47 volts. He did show me a CPU-Z verified screenshot of it doing 2.9 (242*12) but I dont think it was stable obviously.

    So I think the chip is quite good being able to get to 242HTT on its highest multi?

    However, Ive really played around with my memory timings based from kakaroto DDR600 TCCD guide.

    I keep falling on DFIs Memtest86+ 1.55, test 6 and Ive managed to get the errors down to 46 from within the hundereds.

    The setup to try this was:
    3800 Venice 300HTT , 1.45v (maybe I needed more volts through the CPU?)
    2*512 OCZ Plats Rev2 1:1 1T (2.8v, seemed to like 2.8 more than 2.9volts) Was running Dual Channel in slots 1 and 3 (yellow banks)
    DFI Lanparty NF4 SLI-DR, 6-23 bios
    Hiper Type-R 580w PSU

    Any ideas as to where I may be falling?

    Many thanks

    Im not sure but isnt Venice known for having bad mem controller to? Im sure you will find your help here. btw welcome to xtremesystems
    (a little bit late for me to say that thou)
    Opteron 165 270x9
    DFI LanParty UT Nf3 Ultra-D
    2x TwinMos Winbond BH-5 @ 442Mhz 1.5-2-2-0
    X850XT

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    848
    Thanks for the Welcome

    Im not to sure about their mem controllers, Ive seen users hitting 2.7 on 3000 Venices - but I suppose it depends on what batch your chip came from.

    Well tried with higher CPU voltage, still no good. Maybe the 704 bios which is suited to TCCD hmm.

    If it ain't watercooled, I don't wanna know.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Lancaster, PA
    Posts
    3,814
    have you tried the orange slots at all?
    A wolf in wolves clothing.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    848
    Yes, I did at first being as a NF4 thread at another forum said these usually were more stable, when I had the errors I decided to try the yellow ones and these weilded less errors although, I think I changed some of the memory settings when I did.

    I will test again with the less errornous settings and the orange slots.

    If it ain't watercooled, I don't wanna know.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    237
    if its failing memtest then surely the ram is holding you back.
    maybe need to slacken back the timings or put a divider on for now and see if it helps
    or try 1 stick at a time
    I7 920 D0 (4.2GHZ HT on) // eVGA Classified // 6GB Corsair dominator 1600mhz // Asus HD5770 x2 // Corsair HX850 /--/
    PA120.3 // EK Supreme LT // MCP655 // MM Ufo (soon to be TJ07)

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Maastricht, Netherlands
    Posts
    257
    try the sticks seperately.. and see how they do...

    Regards
    Bench System:


    CPU:Intel core 2 duo E7400 2.8Ghz @ 3.4Ghz
    CPU:Intel core 2 duo E6400 Conroe Batch L629A7XX
    CPU:Intel core 2 quad Q9400 2.66Ghz @ 3.0Ghz
    MOBO:Asus P5Q Pro
    RAM:Corssair 2x1 GB PC6400 DDR2-800
    RAM:Corssair 2x2 GB PC6400 DDR2-800
    RAM:Avexir DDR2-1066 w/ Handpicked Elpida's
    VGA:Asus GTX 560 1GB
    HD: Westerdigital 160GB SATA
    HD: Westerdigital 500GB SATA
    PSU:Coolermaster Silent Pro 700W

  8. #8
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    517
    try the 5.10-3FIX bios. That works the best for me till now. Can you post use a screenshot of your A64 tweaker settings or a pic of your bios settings ?
    This is the first im hearing about TCCD liking the yellow slots more. Also try to actively cool them . It helps.

  9. #9
    SSD faster than your HDD
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    2,627
    Mekrel,

    Try these settings....this will test whether the ram will run 300 first...then you can work on raising the CPU multi so you can find the best balance.

    In Genie Bios

    300
    auto
    16 16
    7
    100
    disable
    1.500v
    1.300v
    above VID 110%
    1.30v
    1.70v
    2.7V

    DRAM Config

    200
    enable
    2.5
    4
    7
    3 (might have to be 4 here)
    10
    16
    2
    3
    2
    3
    1816 or 2064
    auto (this setting is not in the 704-2BT bios)
    enabled
    auto
    0
    Level 7 (try Level 8 also)
    level 2
    8ns
    normal
    6ns
    256
    disable
    16
    07
    disable

  10. #10
    the jedi master
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Manchester uk/Sunnyvale CA
    Posts
    3,884
    Quote Originally Posted by RyderOCZ
    Mekrel,

    Try these settings....this will test whether the ram will run 300 first...then you can work on raising the CPU multi so you can find the best balance.

    In Genie Bios

    300
    auto
    16 16
    7
    100
    disable
    1.500v
    1.300v
    above VID 110%
    1.30v
    1.70v
    2.7V

    DRAM Config

    200
    enable
    2.5
    4
    7
    3 (might have to be 4 here)
    10
    16
    2
    3
    2
    3
    1816 or 2064
    auto (this setting is not in the 704-2BT bios)
    enabled
    auto
    0
    Level 7 (try Level 8 also)
    level 2
    8ns
    normal
    6ns
    256
    disable
    16
    07 Bypass max at 4 or 5 is better here.
    disable
    I changes bypass max, 7 is quite agressive here
    Got a problem with your OCZ product....?
    Have a look over here
    Tony AKA BigToe


    Tuning PC's for speed...Run whats fast, not what you think is fast

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    848
    Those options would not boot at all had to reset CMOS

    I noticed you had put HTT mutli to auto, but with 300HTT I put it as *3 to stay within the 1000Mhz HTT spec.

    I see the plan though to try and take the CPU out of the equation.

    If it ain't watercooled, I don't wanna know.

  12. #12
    SSD faster than your HDD
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    2,627
    Well, looks like 300 might be out of reach for that pair....try 2.5-4-4 or 3-4-4...it might get you there.

    Or just use slightly lower FSB but try 2.5-3-3-x timings.

  13. #13
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    6,421
    Might as well be your memory controller, try 1 stick at a time at 2T command.
    If it does ok it has got to be your memcontroler.

    Most TCCD will hit DDR 600 at 2,5-4-4-x
    Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z | FX 8350 | 2x4GB Trident-X 2600 C10 | 2x ATI HD5870 Crossfire | Enermax Revo 1050watt | OCZ Vertex 3 60GB | Samsung F1 1TB

    Watercooling: XSPC Raystorm | EK 5870 Delrin fullcover | TFC X-changer 480 w/ 4x Gentle Typhoon | DDC2+ Delrin top | EK 200mm res | Primochill LRT 3/8 tubing

    Case: Murdermodded TJ-07

    sub 9 sec. SPi1M 940BE 955BE 965BE 1090T

  14. #14
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    848
    yeah I pretty sure its the memory controller, but I will try the single stick options.

    I can go with lower FSB, will report back when im back from work late tomorrow.

    If it ain't watercooled, I don't wanna know.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    MANCHESTER - UK
    Posts
    471
    how old is your ocz set?

  16. #16
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    848
    Im not sure, I will check the sticks later for that.

    At the moment im priming, so far 4 hours stable.

    300HTT * 9 but using a 5/6 divider to keep the memory at 250 2.5-3-3-7 , I ran these 2.5-3-3-5 on the old 754 setup, but I swore I read 7 creates better bandwidth somewhere?

    I have not tweaked them with the advanced memory timings yet but once I know this is stable I will have a play to get bandwidth as high as possible

    Thats with vdimm at 2.8 and temps are brilliant, the CPU hasnt even gone above 43 degrees yet with processor using full priority, chipset sticking around 41 degrees with about 1.7 volts going through it. Chipset used to idle higher than that before reseating it with some AS5 and thinner pressure pads.

    Thanks for the help, ill keep an eye out on getting my hands on some proven 300HTT+ sticks so I know if it was the memory controller or the ram itself.

    I have the feeling its the actual sticks though.

    Cheers

    If it ain't watercooled, I don't wanna know.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Belgrade, Serbia
    Posts
    801
    Quote Originally Posted by RyderOCZ
    Mekrel,

    Try these settings....this will test whether the ram will run 300 first...then you can work on raising the CPU multi so you can find the best balance.

    In Genie Bios

    300
    auto x3
    16 16
    7
    100
    disable
    1.500v
    1.300v
    above VID 110%
    1.30v
    1.70v
    2.7V

    DRAM Config

    200
    enable
    2.5
    4
    7 5 or 6
    3 (might have to be 4 here)
    10 7 then 9
    16 14
    2
    3
    2
    3
    1816 or 2064 4708
    auto (this setting is not in the 704-2BT bios)
    enabled
    auto
    0
    Level 7 auto or 8
    level 2 auto or 1
    8ns
    normal put fast
    6ns 5
    256
    disable
    16
    07
    disable
    i have a problems with my g.skill 4400le and i have spent weeks playing with it one thing about my sticks is that more often they react better with tighter timmings than loose so try what i boldeded one by one and see if memtest errors decrease, also even if mt passes tons of loops doesnt mean it will be stable in windows since with some settings i can mt all night but i get bsods in win with whaterer multy or voltage, doesnt cost to try (except time

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •