Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Revolution in the mac world

  1. #1
    Xtremely slow runner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,289

    Revolution in the mac world

    It's even bigger than the use of intel chips : Apple is producing and selling a mouse with more than ONE button

    http://www.apple.com/mightymouse/

    I just ordered one and i'll tell you how it goes once i get it.
    I had troubles using a MX900 on the PB through BT i guess it'll be more fluid with this one. The only bad points is that there is not a wireless version
    The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings.

    Av by Frisch This is not a Lime tree

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Fairfield, Connecticut
    Posts
    485
    LOL, that is one of the things I ALWAYS loathed about Macintosh machines. Its good to see them step into reality and practicality with this.
    Q6600 @ 3.4GHz - 1.4v, 4GB PC26400, Asus P5B-Deluxe WIFI, BFG 8800GTX OC2, (4x)Seagate 15k.5 SAS RAID0 on Adaptec 4805 w/128MB cache, approx 1.3TB SATA300, Gateway 24" LCD.

  3. #3
    Xtremely slow runner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,289
    It was always possible to use "pc" mouse with two buttons but this mouse looks good
    The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings.

    Av by Frisch This is not a Lime tree

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Fairfield, Connecticut
    Posts
    485
    Yeah, I know that you could use other mice but I'd want one to match if I had a Mac. That one is interesting to me and hints at what the design of the new product line might be like.
    Q6600 @ 3.4GHz - 1.4v, 4GB PC26400, Asus P5B-Deluxe WIFI, BFG 8800GTX OC2, (4x)Seagate 15k.5 SAS RAID0 on Adaptec 4805 w/128MB cache, approx 1.3TB SATA300, Gateway 24" LCD.

  5. #5
    Xtremely slow runner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,289
    Yeah it is interesting, i should be getting it any day now.
    Apple is really taking an aggressive step against the pc's (and ms btw). First going intel which gives more powerful chips, less pricey and allows to renew the whole machines every 6 months or more, now getting a real mouse (which is compatible with windows), the ipod who almost everybody is using and has become the name for mp3 walkman...
    Soon the mac will be like a pc, only better looking and with OSX which gives apple a edge (of course it'll still be more expensive)
    The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings.

    Av by Frisch This is not a Lime tree

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Fairfield, Connecticut
    Posts
    485
    They can't get too anti-MS or MS will can its Mac development center (read: MS Office for Mac) which would hurt them until OpenOffice is 100% interoperable.
    Q6600 @ 3.4GHz - 1.4v, 4GB PC26400, Asus P5B-Deluxe WIFI, BFG 8800GTX OC2, (4x)Seagate 15k.5 SAS RAID0 on Adaptec 4805 w/128MB cache, approx 1.3TB SATA300, Gateway 24" LCD.

  7. #7
    Xtremely slow runner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,289
    And don't forget that ms has shares in apple, so when apple is doing good, ms is loosing and winning money, weird huh?
    If pages really improves and they have an excel equivalent then they won't need office that badly.
    Plus office mac is hell to use on a mac, it's very slow and takes up a lot of ressources. Even office 2k3 windows running under virtual pc is faster! (yes the prog emulated is faster than the native one)

    Anyway i just got the mouse and i'm using it and it looks very nice, it'll post some more once use it some more
    The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings.

    Av by Frisch This is not a Lime tree

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Fairfield, Connecticut
    Posts
    485
    I'll have to get my biohazard suit out of the closet and head on down to the Apple store to check it out. I hope I don't like it, lol.
    Q6600 @ 3.4GHz - 1.4v, 4GB PC26400, Asus P5B-Deluxe WIFI, BFG 8800GTX OC2, (4x)Seagate 15k.5 SAS RAID0 on Adaptec 4805 w/128MB cache, approx 1.3TB SATA300, Gateway 24" LCD.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    311
    it doesnt look very ergonomic, i dont like the feel of the button click as the button is on the under side of the mouse, but thats just me

    about mac going intel, giving them better performance why do you think the G5's are so good because they have the ibm chip

  10. #10
    Xtreme Recruit
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Fortress of solitude, VA, USA
    Posts
    92
    At least it's ambidextrous



    Opteron 144 CAB2E 0546 UPMW . XP-120 HS . Panaflo 120mm L1A . DFI Lanparty NF4 Ultra-D . 2 GB (2x1GB) OCZ EL PC4000 XTC @ 3-4-3-8
    Connect3D x850 xt pe . Dell 1901FP . Seasonic S12 600W . Antec SX1040B

    A64 3000+ Venice 0521BPKW . XP-120 HS . Panaflo 120mm L1A . DFI Lanparty NF4 Ultra-D . 1 GB (2x512) OCZ PC3700EB @ 3-3-2-8
    Connect3D x850 xt pe . Dell 1901FP . Seasonic S12 600W . Antec SX1040B

    my heatware: 75-0-0


  11. #11
    Admin
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Posts
    12,338
    I hate the way it works...I'm used to having my middle and index fingers in constant contact with the buttons. If you do that with this mouse, it will always left click. You have to lift your index to get a right click...really dumb. Anyway, it is fairly ergonomic and ambidextrous. The scroll ball isn't great either...works better in XP than OSX (you cant customize the scroll rate in OSX). It doesn't have a middle button either. Both side buttons need to be depressed simultaneously to register as well.

    While I love the way it looks and the idea behind it (one single button with 2+ button functionality), I'll wait for rev. 2.

  12. #12
    Xtremely slow runner
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,289
    Quote Originally Posted by Vapor
    I hate the way it works...I'm used to having my middle and index fingers in constant contact with the buttons. If you do that with this mouse, it will always left click. You have to lift your index to get a right click...really dumb. Anyway, it is fairly ergonomic and ambidextrous. The scroll ball isn't great either...works better in XP than OSX (you cant customize the scroll rate in OSX). It doesn't have a middle button either. Both side buttons need to be depressed simultaneously to register as well.

    While I love the way it looks and the idea behind it (one single button with 2+ button functionality), I'll wait for rev. 2.
    Most of the people use the mouse with one finger. The scroll bar is really good and it very easy to scroll in a picture with it.
    There is a middle button, press the ball and that's a third click, press the side that's a fourth one (you only need to press one side)
    It also works better under osx, you need to install the drivers. There is no driver for XP so it behaves like a regular mouse.

    I've been using it all night and it ergonomic (i'm a leftie and logitech and other big heavy mouse are not really suited for me). The ball is really nice, it looks very sleak. I've configured it as left and right click plus middle button and the sides are expose. It's not a gamer's mouse and never pretended too.

    As for IBM chips, they were good but the competition evolved ibm didn't. The G5 are stuck at 2.xGHz for more than a year and there is no sign of a mobile chip (the fastest growing market). What used to be top of the line is now just regular.

    Order mac user are not contagious Tell me how it goes
    The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings.

    Av by Frisch This is not a Lime tree

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    311
    well i think thats the main reason mac are going intel is for the laptops right with the next dothan and stuff

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •