It`s all here at AMDzone
It`s all here at AMDzone
Excellent mate - You're the man today.......
![]()
Previous system:
DFI NF4 ULTRA 0453A3 KOREA CHIPSET / BIOS 510-2FIX / FX-57 0516WPMW@3.62GHZ / 2x256 CORSAIR 3200LLPT BH-5@13x278MHZ 2-2-2-5@3.69VDIMM / MACH II GT@MOD BY BERKUT / ACTIVE COOLING FOR RAM - MOSFETS - GPU RAM / CHIPSET & GPU CORE WATERCOOLED / OCZ POWERSTEAM 600W / BUILT BY ATI X850XT@660/651 - VGPU@1.73-VDD@2.26-VDDQ@2.21 PENCIL MOD / WIN XP 2x80GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP80 SATA - RAID 0 & WIN 2K 40GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP40 IDE BENCH DRIVE / PIC
![]()
----------------><------------------
Methinks a dual core for half the price is the way to go this time around...
Perkam
im with perkam i preffer ten times more a 4400 or 4200 rather than a fx57 in the near future we will see which one is faster
Incoming new computer after 5 long years
YOU want to FIGHT CANCER OR AIDS join us at WCG and help to have a better FUTURE
Seems like a better deal yes! But still looking forward to see how they doOriginally Posted by perkam
![]()
Playing station: DFI UT X48 T3R @ EK NB // Q6600 @ 3,2GhZ @ True (soon Dtek V1) // 280gtx (soon EK 280gtx) // 2*2GB Gskill 12800 CL7 // Corsair HX1000 // 250GB ES.2 - 160GB T166 - 2*160WD RE // Lian Li V2000B // Swiftech 240+360 - 2*DDC 1
Servers: ASUS Crosshair // X2 3800+ // 2*1GB Gskill PC6400 HZ // R3650 // IBM workstation
Laptop: Znote 4200, running on 5th year now
What's the difference between their CPU and an FX55 San Diego?
Theirs being an 'engineering sample'?
Heh...different multy.Originally Posted by RaptorRaider
From what I've seen in their pics the CPU they use seems to have a default multiplier of 13x.
I mean the first picture on the second page.
They call their 2.8Ghz shot 'overclocking'.
This is overclocking comparing to FX55.
It`s just a preview of how FX57 will look and perform like. The real FX57 will have SD core and x14 multy.
Then why do they call theirs a 'special FX57 engineering sample' and do they photoshop the pictures?
I think it`s just a joke. I don`t see the reason why should they edit the pics.
I think they are trying to complain that the holdout on releasing the FX57 is just to squeeze more money out of the FX55 line.
For those of you about to post:
They have an FX-55 SD & overclockin' it at 2.8GHz [ fx-57 freq ].
that's what they meant & did.