Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: Why do the FX's put out more heat?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    213

    Why do the FX's put out more heat?

    Hey guys,

    In the quest to get 3ghz prime stable, I have been through 5 CPU's in the last 6 months ( FX-53, 3200+ winchester, 3800+ venice, 4000+ San Diego, and now FX-55 San Diego).

    I've noticed on both the FX's that they put out more heat than the other chips, why would this be? Esp as 4000+ SD is almost the same chip as FX SD isn't it?

    Temps seem to be around 5-10 degrees higher on compareable voltage, and pwm temps also go up with FX's (in my case from 34 degrees to 40 degrees. I've only noticed this because I've gone through a lot of CPU's in a short time.

    Oh and still can't hit 3Ghz prime stable (even tho she will boot @3ghz on default volts), this FX does 2.98ghz....so close and yet so far
    Last edited by madpete; 05-26-2005 at 05:38 AM.
    Intel Core i7 3820 / ASUS X79 Sabertooth
    Gskill 2133mhz Quad 16GB / Auzentech X-FI Forte
    Sapphire HD5970 OC 2GB
    4x 500GB Western Digital "Black Edition" (Raid5)
    Thermaltake ToughPower 1500w PSU / OCZ 1250W PSU
    Corsair H100
    CoolerMaster CM-690 / Windows 7 Pro 64bit
    Samsung T260HD 26" LCD / HDTV

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    970
    There is no reason that a 4000+ claw should draw less than a FX-53.
    They are the same chip but with unlocked multis.

    Compared to the other chips the 0.13 nm and 1 mb cache makes the difference.
    Opteron 165
    Dfi NF4 Expert
    4x1 1GB twinmos PC 3200
    XFX 7900GT 550/1500

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    213
    Yeah thats what I thought, yet it does happen on my system, i can't really explain it.
    Intel Core i7 3820 / ASUS X79 Sabertooth
    Gskill 2133mhz Quad 16GB / Auzentech X-FI Forte
    Sapphire HD5970 OC 2GB
    4x 500GB Western Digital "Black Edition" (Raid5)
    Thermaltake ToughPower 1500w PSU / OCZ 1250W PSU
    Corsair H100
    CoolerMaster CM-690 / Windows 7 Pro 64bit
    Samsung T260HD 26" LCD / HDTV

  4. #4
    Love and Peace!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    hiding somewhere!
    Posts
    3,675
    i have a suspicion that AMD uses more faster/hotter transistors in the FX line.
    Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Rye, Ny
    Posts
    1,649
    yeah i second ozzimarks comment...they expect people to overclock with the fx so they mite give it a little more headroom

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    300
    FX-55 Clawhammer supposedly had some implementation of strained silicon, which could explain the higher heat. And correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't FX-55 San Diego have a default voltage of 1.5v? If so, the reason for higher heat should be obvious.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by frostedflakes
    FX-55 Clawhammer supposedly had some implementation of strained silicon, which could explain the higher heat. And correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't FX-55 San Diego have a default voltage of 1.5v? If so, the reason for higher heat should be obvious.

    Does it? I didn't think it did.

    If i set mine to auto it reads out as 1.35 ish in smart guardian, which usually means its actually 1.4v.

    But what I was talking about was at the same volts, the FX's are hotter, and they also seem to heat up the PWM more too...as if theres more strain on it.
    Intel Core i7 3820 / ASUS X79 Sabertooth
    Gskill 2133mhz Quad 16GB / Auzentech X-FI Forte
    Sapphire HD5970 OC 2GB
    4x 500GB Western Digital "Black Edition" (Raid5)
    Thermaltake ToughPower 1500w PSU / OCZ 1250W PSU
    Corsair H100
    CoolerMaster CM-690 / Windows 7 Pro 64bit
    Samsung T260HD 26" LCD / HDTV

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by frostedflakes
    Is the OPN on your processor ADAFX55DAA5BN? This correlates with a 1.5v part.
    Frosted, off the top of my head I don't know, but I will check (I always forget to write it down). I was not even aware that there where FX's with 1.5v as default volts, I thought the AA meant variable voltage???

    Edit: Your post appears to have vanished
    Last edited by madpete; 05-26-2005 at 09:59 AM.
    Intel Core i7 3820 / ASUS X79 Sabertooth
    Gskill 2133mhz Quad 16GB / Auzentech X-FI Forte
    Sapphire HD5970 OC 2GB
    4x 500GB Western Digital "Black Edition" (Raid5)
    Thermaltake ToughPower 1500w PSU / OCZ 1250W PSU
    Corsair H100
    CoolerMaster CM-690 / Windows 7 Pro 64bit
    Samsung T260HD 26" LCD / HDTV

  9. #9
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    venezuela caracas
    Posts
    6,460
    4000sd venice winnies all are 90nm fx are 130 so more heat...
    Incoming new computer after 5 long years

    YOU want to FIGHT CANCER OR AIDS join us at WCG and help to have a better FUTURE

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    213
    My FX-55 SD is 90nm

    But anyway, the FX-55 SD, runs hotter than the 4000+ SD at same volts with same cooling, and the PWM temps are also higher (they are both 90nm). There must be something differant about the FX's, just don't know what it is.
    Last edited by madpete; 05-26-2005 at 12:15 PM.
    Intel Core i7 3820 / ASUS X79 Sabertooth
    Gskill 2133mhz Quad 16GB / Auzentech X-FI Forte
    Sapphire HD5970 OC 2GB
    4x 500GB Western Digital "Black Edition" (Raid5)
    Thermaltake ToughPower 1500w PSU / OCZ 1250W PSU
    Corsair H100
    CoolerMaster CM-690 / Windows 7 Pro 64bit
    Samsung T260HD 26" LCD / HDTV

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    300
    Quote Originally Posted by madpete
    Frosted, off the top of my head I don't know, but I will check (I always forget to write it down). I was not even aware that there where FX's with 1.5v as default volts, I thought the AA meant variable voltage???

    Edit: Your post appears to have vanished
    Yeah you're right, after I posted I did some searching and realized I messed up, so I went ahead and deleted the post.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    venezuela caracas
    Posts
    6,460
    maybe is dsl sSOI ????
    Incoming new computer after 5 long years

    YOU want to FIGHT CANCER OR AIDS join us at WCG and help to have a better FUTURE

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    No(r)way
    Posts
    452
    Maybe the temp- sensor on the FX chips has been calibrated differently to further remove the chance of the "cold bug" appearing?
    Just a thought...

  14. #14
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Hammel/Denmark
    Posts
    2,060
    The defult volt for a 90nm Sd is 1.35-1.4v ...............
    The whole world's hip and thats not cool !

    Rip Van Hippy

    Doesn't expecting the unexpected make the unexpected the expected ?

    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak


    -------------------------

  15. #15
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,692
    possibly better memory controller and lower latency cache..... have you try to bench both 4000 SD and FX55 SD side by side at the same clock speed on same voltage and see if there's any difference?
    Core i7 920 D0 3844A717 4.40Ghz HT on @1.36v (LinX/Prime/3D stable), Corsair 850W, 12GB OCZ Platinum 1600, P6T Deluxe V2, EVGA GTX 285 SS, OCZ Vortex SSD 30GB x3 RAID0, HAF 932.
    Water Cooling Setup: XSPC RX360, MCP355 + XSPC Res Top, Swiftech GTZ, 1/2" Tygon, Scythe S-Flex SFF21F push, 20mm yateloon D12SL-12C pull.


    Opteron 148 CABNE 0528 GPMW 3.1Ghz @1.6v Prime Stable. Westy 37" LVM-37W3, DFI Venus 975, 2GB TeamX Cronus Micron, GSkill HZ, Sapphire X1900XTX, Zippy 700W, X-Fi Xtrememusic, 36GB Raptors x2 @Raid-0.
    WC Setup: PA120.3 +Shroud, MCP655, STORM, MCW60, 1/2" Tygon, mini res, Yate Loon.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by ben805
    possibly better memory controller and lower latency cache..... have you try to bench both 4000 SD and FX55 SD side by side at the same clock speed on same voltage and see if there's any difference?

    Ben, no not conducted any side by side benchies, just an observation on my system. It could be as you say, it could also be the calibration of the temp sensor as has also been mentioned but that does explain higher PWM temps too.
    Intel Core i7 3820 / ASUS X79 Sabertooth
    Gskill 2133mhz Quad 16GB / Auzentech X-FI Forte
    Sapphire HD5970 OC 2GB
    4x 500GB Western Digital "Black Edition" (Raid5)
    Thermaltake ToughPower 1500w PSU / OCZ 1250W PSU
    Corsair H100
    CoolerMaster CM-690 / Windows 7 Pro 64bit
    Samsung T260HD 26" LCD / HDTV

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,692
    if someone can do a side by side comparison and confirm the FX to be superior to regular SD...which I think it should, then you got your answers.
    Core i7 920 D0 3844A717 4.40Ghz HT on @1.36v (LinX/Prime/3D stable), Corsair 850W, 12GB OCZ Platinum 1600, P6T Deluxe V2, EVGA GTX 285 SS, OCZ Vortex SSD 30GB x3 RAID0, HAF 932.
    Water Cooling Setup: XSPC RX360, MCP355 + XSPC Res Top, Swiftech GTZ, 1/2" Tygon, Scythe S-Flex SFF21F push, 20mm yateloon D12SL-12C pull.


    Opteron 148 CABNE 0528 GPMW 3.1Ghz @1.6v Prime Stable. Westy 37" LVM-37W3, DFI Venus 975, 2GB TeamX Cronus Micron, GSkill HZ, Sapphire X1900XTX, Zippy 700W, X-Fi Xtrememusic, 36GB Raptors x2 @Raid-0.
    WC Setup: PA120.3 +Shroud, MCP655, STORM, MCW60, 1/2" Tygon, mini res, Yate Loon.

  18. #18
    Love and Peace!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    hiding somewhere!
    Posts
    3,675
    Quote Originally Posted by leviathan18
    maybe is dsl sSOI ????
    DSL = dual stress liners = fancy name for strained silicon

    frodin: i don't think the temp sensor has anything to do with the cold bug. after reading around, i think it's the memory controller failing when it gets really cold. this is just my theory though
    Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them

  19. #19
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,523
    @madpete, what week is your fx55 sd?

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Cheshire, UK
    Posts
    213
    Quote Originally Posted by Dumo
    @madpete, what week is your fx55 sd?

    Dumo,

    0513 mate...

    ADAFX55DAA5BN - CABCE 0513MPAW
    Last edited by madpete; 05-27-2005 at 11:56 AM.
    Intel Core i7 3820 / ASUS X79 Sabertooth
    Gskill 2133mhz Quad 16GB / Auzentech X-FI Forte
    Sapphire HD5970 OC 2GB
    4x 500GB Western Digital "Black Edition" (Raid5)
    Thermaltake ToughPower 1500w PSU / OCZ 1250W PSU
    Corsair H100
    CoolerMaster CM-690 / Windows 7 Pro 64bit
    Samsung T260HD 26" LCD / HDTV

  21. #21
    XIP
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    5,523
    Quote Originally Posted by madpete
    Dumo,

    0513 mate...

    ADAFX55DAA5BN - CABCE 0513MPAW
    Interesting, mine is 0511 CABGE-MPMW. Lets compare notes

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •