Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 99

Thread: A64 X2 4800+ @ 3 GHz & PCMark04: 8548

  1. #51
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,707
    PCMark04: 9017

    God damnit! 3 points from FUGGER's Intel WR
    Favourite game: 3DMark
    Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
    Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri

  2. #52
    Champion
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    1,189
    What clock?

  3. #53
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Belgium, Dendermonde
    Posts
    1,292
    Quote Originally Posted by Sampsa
    PCMark04: 9017

    God damnit! 3 points from FUGGER's Intel WR
    some ln2 might do the trick

  4. #54
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    139
    looks great! impressive
    i7 2600K 4.9Ghz @ 1.424v, Noctua NH-D14, Asus P8P67, 16GB Corsair XMS3 1600Mhz, GB GeForce GTX 460 OC, OCZ 600W PSU - www.LV-88.com

  5. #55
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    357
    Very nice results indeed. Dual core looks awesome.

  6. #56
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    242
    What vcore are you giving it now?
    P4C800E DL,P4 2.4c @ 3.4(droop mod),1G Mushkin 3500 II 2,2,2,8 @ 3.1v,AIW 9800 Pro (450/370 @ 1.9v core),Audiology Platinum,2xDiamonds 8mb Raid0,Lian-Li Pc70,PC P & Cooling 510D,Plextor 708A,Plextor 52x32x52...water cooled...

  7. #57
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    US, Virginia
    Posts
    1,513
    Quote Originally Posted by Sampsa
    Yes but I should still be able to compare power consumption between A64 X2 4800+ and FX-55 if I only change the CPU in the system, right?
    makes sense to me.
    E8400 @ 3600mhz
    4870 @ 790/1100
    2x2GB DDR2

  8. #58
    Xtreme Owner Charles Wirth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    11,653
    Nice!

    My 2K4 was also done at a little over 200FSB as I was testing to get past 5Ghz. Dont forget my mobo was very limitd limited and I should have been well over 5Ghz.

    Pi's are close and I am sure I can do much better.
    Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
    ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
    GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
    64GB Galax Hall of Fame
    Intel Optane
    Platimax 1245W

    Intel 3175X
    Asus Dominus Extreme
    GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
    96GB Patriot Steel
    Intel Optane 900P RAID

  9. #59
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    lake forest, CA
    Posts
    787
    Sampsa needs to send FUGGER his CPU and mobo so FUGGER can put it on his triple cascade and get that X2 up to 4GHz!!

  10. #60
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,707
    Quote Originally Posted by mesyn191
    Sampsa needs to send FUGGER his CPU and mobo so FUGGER can put it on his triple cascade and get that X2 up to 4GHz!!
    Naah, I'll be giving it some LN2 treatment in few days.
    Favourite game: 3DMark
    Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
    Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri

  11. #61
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,707
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER
    Nice!

    My 2K4 was also done at a little over 200FSB as I was testing to get past 5Ghz. Dont forget my mobo was very limitd limited and I should have been well over 5Ghz.

    Pi's are close and I am sure I can do much better.
    I have to say that I can do much better also

    I tried Pentium EE 840 today with Vapochill LS. I have to say that the experiment was HORRIBLE. I was able to run spi1m @ 4,5 GHz but not PCMark04 even at 4 GHz. Asus Probe showed CPU temp 33C under load and Vapo's LCD showed -32C for evap

    Components next to Socket 775 were EXTREMELY hot.
    Favourite game: 3DMark
    Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
    Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri

  12. #62
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,707
    Here are my results with Vapochill LS:






    Favourite game: 3DMark
    Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
    Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri

  13. #63
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,707
    Quote Originally Posted by Sampsa
    Power consumption was 440W during PCMark04
    My mistake, this is not correct because there was also Vapochill LS between the Antec 550W and wall socket
    Favourite game: 3DMark
    Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
    Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri

  14. #64
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,707


    Favourite game: 3DMark
    Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
    Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri

  15. #65
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,559
    Nice show there Sampsa.

    Sampsa needs to send FUGGER his CPU and mobo so FUGGER can put it on his triple cascade and get that X2 up to 4GHz!!
    I have a feeling that it will be in better hands here in Finland
    Also it's quite obvious that this chip ain't going to see anywhere near 4GHz - no matter what cooling.

  16. #66
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    242
    Thanks for sharing all this info with us Sampsa.:beer:
    So, you got to 3.0 @ 1.4v and 3.1 @ 1.55v would it be fair to say that it would scale higher with more vcore? Maybe 3.3-3.4 could be reached with pase.
    P4C800E DL,P4 2.4c @ 3.4(droop mod),1G Mushkin 3500 II 2,2,2,8 @ 3.1v,AIW 9800 Pro (450/370 @ 1.9v core),Audiology Platinum,2xDiamonds 8mb Raid0,Lian-Li Pc70,PC P & Cooling 510D,Plextor 708A,Plextor 52x32x52...water cooled...

  17. #67
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    3.1GHz with a Vapo LS is pretty good going actually considering it is 2 cores. FX-55 on single stage phase was at max getting 3.3GHz.

    Of course this is one chip so it might be bad or might be good. However AMD bringing out a duel core at only 200Mhz less than FX-55 seems to be replicated with the overclock ( 200Mhz drop ).

    Asuming Sampsa's chip is average ( a big IF ) then this is not bad at all and bodes well for the future. I'm actually quite surprised to be honest, I thought x2 would be dire !

    I'm still more interested in Dothan and Fx-57 though at present, but I am really looking forward to what Sampsa can do with very few kelvin. You have to think two cores will like few kelvin an awful lot. More so than voltage of course.

    Regards

    Andy
    Last edited by zakelwe; 05-16-2005 at 09:52 AM.

  18. #68
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,707
    Quote Originally Posted by macci
    Also it's quite obvious that this chip ain't going to see anywhere near 4GHz - no matter what cooling.
    Yes, it would be a miracle to hit 4 GHz with this chip

    Anyway, I'll try to hunt 10k in PCMark04. I'll also try to find out if this CPU can go higher for 3DMark05 than my FX-55 (3474 MHz),
    Favourite game: 3DMark
    Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
    Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri

  19. #69
    silver wall jumper X
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,579
    Awesome score! Good luck on your quest to 10k!

  20. #70
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607
    jesus man, 9 K on PCM'04 and not even 3.1 ghz. thats just crazy...
    I can't wait to see what this does under cascades and LN2.




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  21. #71
    Xtreme Owner Charles Wirth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    11,653
    I had another 2K4 submitted and not published.

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2948934

    200FSB on the link above.
    Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
    ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
    GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
    64GB Galax Hall of Fame
    Intel Optane
    Platimax 1245W

    Intel 3175X
    Asus Dominus Extreme
    GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
    96GB Patriot Steel
    Intel Optane 900P RAID

  22. #72
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,559
    your score went up by 44MArks (9003 => 9047) when you overclocked from 4351MHz to 4817MHz??
    Is this the new dual-core scaling or what??

  23. #73
    Xtreme Owner Charles Wirth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    11,653
    no from 4.669Ghz to 4.8Ghz about 140Mhz gain in speed. The 4.66 was at 333FSB 1:1 3-2-2
    Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
    ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
    GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
    64GB Galax Hall of Fame
    Intel Optane
    Platimax 1245W

    Intel 3175X
    Asus Dominus Extreme
    GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
    96GB Patriot Steel
    Intel Optane 900P RAID

  24. #74
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    lake forest, CA
    Posts
    787
    Man you guys are lucky, I've only ever gotten a good OC once waay back with a Palimino 1700+ @ 2Ghz stable on water.

    Even with my VapoLS I can't break 2.8Ghz stable with my A64 3500+ and you guys got the friggin' 3Ghz dual core A64 and 3.45Ghz FX55!?!

    \must be cuz of the cold weather in Finland...

  25. #75
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,559
    Fugger, what do you mean 'no'?
    you've got a score of 9003 at 4351MHz and 9047 at 4817MHz. Obviously also 9020 at 4668MHz.
    So looks like upping the CPU spee doesn't help much there.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •