Dual Core AMD Opteron. First screenshot!

[VVJ]

Congratulations! The Single core AMD Opteron processor with Socket 939 really exists!!!

[STEvil]

????

[aoc007]

Yeah man are you sure you didnt miss-type?

[OvaKilla]

i'll take two.

[VVJ]

aoc007:
man, I'm sure, I can type the letters with the keyboard without mistakes! Moreover, CBId is ready to fully identify them! It even knows about OPNs of these processors. I've just announced the second Release of CBId 7.50. See the news. BTW, there are no more confid. news here from me, I have some troubles.

[smegz]

terrace215:


A man who works in the AMD Connectivity Solutions Group ask me to make a very sexual surprise for Intel By the way, he is a registered member on this forum

This is a sham! PCSG (Personal Connectivity Solutions Group) doesn't even work with processors. CPG (Computational Products Group) does. PCSG makes things like the PIC...dummy.

[VVJ]

This is a sham! PCSG (Personal Connectivity Solutions Group) doesn't even work with processors. CPG (Computational Products Group) does. PCSG makes things like the PIC...dummy.

Oh, man, please, do be ridiculous. And you can’t convince me, because I work with PCSG for a year. PCSG provides answers to many customer questions! Its technical documentation includes a lot of information: technical manuals, data sheets, design guides, application notes and so on. I’ll be provided with everything I want… dummy!

[smegz]

What you say is ridiculous. I truly believe that PCSG can get you a great deal of info...on embedded stuff...not Opterons. Don't believe me...check it out for yourself. Anyone with the most minimal web skills can look up this info.

PCSG
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Connectivit...0_2330,00.html

CPG
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/...30_118,00.html

Flash (Spansion)
http://www.amd.com/us-en/FlashMemory...7_1447,00.html

Don't be mad because your information is wrong...obviously your informant doesn't know what he's talking about. If he works for PCSG, he would not have acccess to this kind of stuff. He might be able to show off the embedded processor that is in the PIC (their flagship) but not a pre-release Opteron...give me a break.

[cha0t1c1]

these shots are siiick, really I feel like throwing up...man I can render without sleeping between each frame....I love AMD, definetly going to exchange those 244's of mine for a couple of 270's, I'll be happy tofork out $3000+, for such insanity, just for bragging rights

[Pivo504]

sexxyy cpu

[Saruji]

why are people arguing like little school girls when there is manly overclocking to do?

[cha0t1c1]

any successful overclocking using a dual motherboard?

[smegz]

why are people arguing like little school girls when there is manly overclocking to do?

Simple...he's obviously lying about his source, he is the programmer, he CAN fake results. I'm not convinced that this is genuine. It shows up on no roadmaps...it's a fake to promote his program. There are too many unanswered questions...notice how he clammed up when pushed.

[iboomalot]

Everyone is cheering for these chips.. They own, no question about it. The prices make them crap, though.

some of you people ^^^^^^^^^^^ are cheap skates go buy a skt754 2800+ or a Barton and stop b!tching please.

$550 for a Dual CPU 3500+ speeds with 1meg of L2 that should be clockable to 2.4 - 2.6 gig which would be like having TWO FX-53s or FX-55s that costs $500 / $810 for ONE CPU much less two CPUs.

I can't wait to get mine, all the gaming speed of my current 3500+ with a 50% faster encoding and my tradestation software is designed for dual CPUs so I should see a 80%+ increase in speed on my # crunching.

9-10 months ago the new 3500+ NC cost $500 now you get two plus twice the cache for the same price.

think its pricey, thats your personal opinion ,but you have cheaper options that you can use, instead of dumbing down the AMD cpu to an Intel level.

[smegz]

I'm not convinced that this is genuine. It shows up on no roadmaps...it's a fake to promote his program. There are too many unanswered questions...notice how he clammed up when pushed.

I think I need to qualify this statement....help if I read my post before submitting. The Paris core and Opteron 200 series are on the roadmap. What is not is a 68W part. See the images at AMDBoard.com for details.

AMDBoard Images

Opterons are shown in 2 flavors...95W and 55W (last image on page), not 68W. This combined with the fact that VVJ is supposedly getting his data from someone in PCSG, a group not known to deal with processors, leads me to believe that something is not Kosher.

[smegz]

The Paris core and Opteron 200 series are on the roadmap.

See what I mean...Italy...not Paris

[VVJ]

Man, don’t dig further! You deal with the Russian mafia! :worm: You need some additional info on dual-core Opteron? I can provide it here.

[smegz]

Man, don’t dig further! You deal with the Russian mafia! :worm: You need some additional info on dual-core Opteron? I can provide it here.

Russian Mafia? You? Don't make me laugh man. So go ahead...enlighten me. What pearls of wisdom do you have regarding DC Opterons? What rabbit can you pull out of your questionable hat? Nothing...that's what. Now had thse screens come from an independent source and not from the programmer, they may carry more weight. It would have been more believable if you had said that the part was 55W but to pull 68 out of your hat...

[TSFroggy]

Russian Mafia? You? Don't make me laugh man. So go ahead...enlighten me. What pearls of wisdom do you have regarding DC Opterons? What rabbit can you pull out of your questionable hat? Nothing...that's what. Now had thse screens come from an independent source and not from the programmer, they may carry more weight. It would have been more believable if you had said that the part was 55W but to pull 68 out of your hat...

[knob]

:P

10 char