Page 1 of 7 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 153

Thread: AMD Dual-Core Toledo Socket939 CPU-Z Pciture

  1. 04-13-2005, 01:54 AM #1
    sxs112
    sxs112 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882
    Send a message via MSN to sxs112 Send a message via Yahoo to sxs112

    *update*AMD Dual-Core Toledo Socket939 CPU-Z Pciture














    update BIOS

    Socket939
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version.  Name: sandra-cpu-2.jpg  Views: 1964  Size: 70.6 KB  ID: 28679   Click image for larger version.  Name: sandra-cpu-3.jpg  Views: 1933  Size: 64.5 KB  ID: 28680   Click image for larger version.  Name: sandra-RAMiBench-1.jpg  Views: 2117  Size: 96.3 KB  ID: 28681   Click image for larger version.  Name: sandra-cpuArtiBench-2.jpg  Views: 1936  Size: 89.2 KB  ID: 28682  
    Last edited by sxs112; 04-14-2005 at 02:45 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 04-13-2005, 02:07 AM #2
    tictac
    tictac is offline
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    any overclock result @ default voltage & Overvolt voltage?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 04-13-2005, 02:09 AM #3
    sxs112
    sxs112 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882
    Send a message via MSN to sxs112 Send a message via Yahoo to sxs112
    Quote Originally Posted by tictac
    any overclock result @ default voltage & Overvolt voltage?
    ATI RS480 reference board can't OC
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 04-13-2005, 02:31 AM #4
    tictac
    tictac is offline
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    Why dont test it on DFI nForce4 Ultra?

    Is it because the processor wont boot on nForce4 board without proper Processor Microcode Update...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 04-13-2005, 02:35 AM #5
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    nice! 1.3v!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 04-13-2005, 02:37 AM #6
    sxs112
    sxs112 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882
    Send a message via MSN to sxs112 Send a message via Yahoo to sxs112
    Quote Originally Posted by tictac
    Why dont test it on DFI nForce4 Ultra?

    Is it because the processor wont boot on nForce4 board without proper Processor Microcode Update...
    Because... This is Test in the company.. Cannot flow out
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 04-13-2005, 02:41 AM #7
    Chris27
    Chris27 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    209
    smuggle it out the back door
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 04-13-2005, 03:05 AM #8
    babyelf
    babyelf is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    805
    then bring the DFI in lol
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 04-13-2005, 03:24 AM #9
    tictac
    tictac is offline
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    Quote Originally Posted by sxs112
    Because... This is Test in the company.. Cannot flow out
    i see...

    anyway thanks for the info
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 04-13-2005, 03:37 AM #10
    Cyprio
    Cyprio is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    239
    When are these due for general release?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 04-13-2005, 03:59 AM #11
    dng29
    dng29 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    369
    I read somewhere that says next week Apr. 21st is the release of the opteron s940 dual core. June is the release of s939 a64 dual core, no specific date. I'm still waiting on the Venice core and this dual core is coming already. i'll probably wait till end of this year or early next year to upgrade to dual core when longhorn comes out. who's going to take the plunge and get dual core s939?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 04-13-2005, 04:36 AM #12
    reject
    reject is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    1,622
    Send a message via MSN to reject
    can u get a photo of it, at least a blurry pic so we can see if the cores are both in the sime die, i cant remember if the cores are separate or together in one big die
    Quote Originally Posted by bh2k
    sorry m, OI'm a bit drunkz!
    Air benches with 3000+, DFI nf3 and 6800GT 2001SE: 26312 3d03: 13028
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 04-13-2005, 04:55 AM #13
    Vincentvega18
    Vincentvega18 is offline
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Brighton, UK
    Posts
    804
    Send a message via MSN to Vincentvega18
    Well hed have to take the ihs off for that........
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 04-13-2005, 05:15 AM #14
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    and they are in one big die, i dont think amd would work so hard and build dual core chips with two cores in one die and make them work, and then build a new dual core cpu that has two single dies...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 04-13-2005, 05:22 AM #15
    Noldor
    Noldor is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    161
    Why is it only 512kb cache on it? wasnt it supposed to be 1 MB? or is it just not showing up on cpu-z?
    Xtreme-lurker since 2002

    Quote Originally Posted by aMp
    Why do I get the feeling that one day John Connor will have to fight that thing?
    - In reply to FCG's new opteron server
    Lian Li PC75 | Iwaki MD20RZ | Thermochill 120.3 w/ 6 panaflows | Storm G4 | Maze 4
    Hardware soon to come...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  16. 04-13-2005, 05:22 AM #16
    Ferry82
    Ferry82 is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    277
    Send a message via MSN to Ferry82
    Wow men you did it again where do you work?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  17. 04-13-2005, 05:29 AM #17
    saaya
    saaya is offline
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Noldor
    Why is it only 512kb cache on it? wasnt it supposed to be 1 MB? or is it just not showing up on cpu-z?
    wow, i didnt notice that... maybe its a bug? or maybe its a different chip... maybe there will be 1mb and 512kb dual core chips?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferry82
    Wow men you did it again where do you work?
    do you honestly think he will answer that?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  18. 04-13-2005, 06:18 AM #18
    $a1Ty
    $a1Ty is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    311
    isnt it 512kb cache per core, so thats just showing one core
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  19. 04-13-2005, 06:28 AM #19
    [_Silence_]
    [_Silence_] is offline
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    265
    Send a message via MSN to [_Silence_]
    Is it possible for u to run SuperPi/Pifast and Sandra?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  20. 04-13-2005, 07:00 AM #20
    panumas05
    panumas05 is offline
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    38
    Send a message via MSN to panumas05
    Thank for this info.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  21. 04-13-2005, 07:06 AM #21
    matt9669
    matt9669 is offline
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    On a crazy college campus! (Nash, TN)
    Posts
    1,250
    Send a message via AIM to matt9669 Send a message via Yahoo to matt9669
    Quote Originally Posted by sxs112
    ATI RS480 reference board can't OC
    Hmm, they could at the ATI event in Dallas . . . in fact they had OC options I'd never seen before

    1.3V default, that is astounding - though I was under the impression that Toledo was 1MB per core, 512KB is nothing to sneeze at . . . thanks for the info bro!

    EDIT: posted this to the FP!
    Last edited by matt9669; 04-13-2005 at 07:37 AM.
    Want your news on the front page? Click here!



    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  22. 04-13-2005, 07:10 AM #22
    Cossey
    Cossey is offline
    Xtreme DČOL Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    339
    how hot do they run compared to the single cores
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  23. 04-13-2005, 07:48 AM #23
    Gogeta
    Gogeta is offline
    Xtreme Infrastructure Eng
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,184
    Thanks for the info sxs112! I'm guessing they break 100W...

    Anyone know when XP 64bit will be widely available?
    Less is more.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  24. 04-13-2005, 07:55 AM #24
    ibby
    ibby is offline
    Mr Fantasic
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,538
    i know what i am buying...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  25. 04-13-2005, 07:58 AM #25
    Revv23
    Revv23 is offline
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    Send a message via AIM to Revv23
    this is great, at 2200mhz too, means that they wont be much slower then regular A64's...

    plus on 939!

    I'm very exited, i was a bit worried after seeing intel's DC stuff, but on 939 with dual cores and a good clock like that, looks like AMD will remain on top for at least a little while longer.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 1 of 7 1234 ... LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules