hi,this is my friend applebred 1.6ghz overclocked,i asked him if i can post his shot of overclocking here,and he agreed,so iam waiting some super pi tests and cpuZ,until that i will post only this..
edit:sry his duron is 1.8ghz stock
hi,this is my friend applebred 1.6ghz overclocked,i asked him if i can post his shot of overclocking here,and he agreed,so iam waiting some super pi tests and cpuZ,until that i will post only this..
edit:sry his duron is 1.8ghz stock
Last edited by komer; 04-06-2005 at 12:43 PM.
45°C in idle.. i doubt he will be able to run benches at that speed
2,6ghz isnt a really extraordinary overclock for those chips, and 260fsb isnt extraordinary either, nice overclock though
what board does he use?
iam sure that 2.6 ghz isnt like on mobiles or amd64 but one is for sure, low end chips can do very nice clocks
it's on the screenOriginally Posted by saaya
E5200
Asus P5Q-VM
A-DATA 2x2GB
Zotac 8800GT
500W Seasonic
Originally Posted by trakslacker
nf7 does 260fsb unmodded? first time i ever hear about this...
abit replaced the nf7-s with the an7 who reached higher fsb speeds, but the highest i have sen unmodded on an nf7-s was 250 iirc
please post some benchmarks and screenshots like cpu-z etc
And you might want to edit out that Windows id code you have posted up. Nice OC!
E4300 @ 3.2ghz, 2x1GB Crucial PC-8500, Gigabyte EP45-UD3P, 4850 X-Fire, OCZ Powerstream 520.
iam waiting my friend to email me some benchmarks....he didnt do 260fsb...i dont know what multi does duron have but we will se when email me benchmarks
1.6ghz duron = 10x166 and they are superlocked, so higher multis wont workOriginally Posted by komer
i have this and one more atm,hope soon i will get cpuz..
the low memory bandwidth looks weird... is he running the meory in async? at what speed? below 200mhz?
Duron 1.6ghz= 12x133Originally Posted by saaya
Duron 1.8ghz= 13.5x133 for stock. The Durons all run a stock FSB of 133mhz and the Semprons run 166mhz
jjcom
i dont know anything atm,he dont respond on my sms,he send me this shots a few days ago,so iam waiting cpuZ and super pi,only i know that he has adata memory,his duron is locked od 13.5
I booted up at 270FSB cas 3-4-4 with some adata pc4000 on a Abit NF7Snf7 does 260fsb unmodded? first time i ever hear about this...
btw I did this long time ago, but prommy cooled :p
|| Core 2 Quad QX6850 ES @ 3.5Ghz 1.35V || Thermalright Ultra 120 || Asus P5K3 Deluxe || Gskill F3-12800CL7D-2GBHZ
|| XFX 8800GTX || Dell 2005FPW 20" || Ultra X-Pro 750W LE || 3 x WD 320GB SD + 1 x Hitachi 500GB
Originally Posted by saaya
Saaya , Abit introduced AN7 with UGuru ...... an easy way to help noobies overclock ..... I have owned both boards ( AN7 and NF7-S , inface I still have my AN7 , good board , real stable ) . NF7-S kills AN7 in terms of overclocking . NF7-S with a modded bios is still one of the fastest if not the fastest NF2 board on the market right now . My max on the AN7 was 235 fsb with Tictac's/Enduracell's bios . While it was 250 mhz for NF7-S ...... same chip , same ram , everything same except the board.
Hope this helps .
yeah, I've got an AN7, does 218mhz FSB with stock BIOS stock everything...just haven't had the time to take the board out of the case and do the "matenice"
Uguru isn't always that great, adjust FSB, system locks, adjust volts, system works fine.
jjcom
ohhh my bad, its a duron... not a sempronOriginally Posted by jjcom
but unmodded? with what nb cooling?Originally Posted by krampak
ive had several nf7-s boards, and id like to disagree. the nf7-s WAS a much better board than the an7 imo, but since it used the older chipset reviisions it overclocked worse than the an7 boards. some an7 boards reach up to 260fsb unmodded (unstable) and i think the an7 boards do 240 on average wich the nf7.s series never really did... maybe that later versions...Originally Posted by |3ourne
dfi infinity nf2 boards reach 250fsb+ unmodded on average afaik. the dfi nf2 board is a much higher and better overclocker, though more unstable and with a slight trend to commiting suicide
I dont see the big woof ??? The new sempy 2600+ 128k Palermo core can do that 24/7 bench stable (1.6 to 2.6)
Perkam
/offtopicOriginally Posted by komer
I have heard that this is because cache is more speed sensitive than the actual core, and lower end chips usually have less cache. Am I correct in this line of thinking. (but then again dothans tens to OC like mad, and they have 2mb)
/offtopic
Nice OC, it's a 1.8ghz duron? ~45% is nothing to sneeze at (62% if it is a 1,6ghz chip ).
Microsoft's homepage can be found at: thesource-dot-ofallevil-dot-com - interesting, no?
Think of something witty and imagine it here.
I've done 8x242 with Barton 2600. 2.3vcore and Nb1c on northbridge. Though i've found them to be max stable around 220-230fsb.
I had a Duron1400 with 256kb cache enabled that dit with 2.2V 2745Mhz pifast (52.13s) and all this with watercooling....so it could be benchabelOriginally Posted by saaya
System:
Opteron 165+ @ 3140mhz @1.5V aircooled
DFI NF4 Ultra-D
4X 512mb Speedpremium PC3500 new BH5
MSI 7900GTO 512MB @ GTX
2x WD 80GB raid 0 + 2x 300GB Maxtor
Channel Well Tech 550W
still no cpuZ...but yeah is a 1.8ghz duron!
I have a AXP 2000+ thats benchstabel 212*12.5 @ 2v. wather temp ca. 18-20
At 213*12.5 It won't boot! so, 2.6 isnt really so big :P
hey sink, welcome to XtremeSystems
yepp, you guys are right, this isnt a real XTREME overclock, so i will move it to the amd section
i dont think so... i think that its because l2 cache is pretty large on the cpu die. a core can only run as fast as its weakest part can run at. since the cache is pretty large theres a high chance that the weakest part is a part of the cache, the less cache you have the lower the chance that theres a limiting part.Originally Posted by Stuperman
its pretty much the same as with 8 or 16 chip memory sticks, the more memory sticks you have the higher the chance that one of them doesnt oc as good and the entire stick can go any higher
Bookmarks