Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 30

Thread: Best distro for "Overclocking"?

  1. #1
    D²OL 4 Life
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    166

    Best distro for "Overclocking"?

    ok well im still "aqurering" windows xp and i wanted to know what linux os would be the best to use in the mean time.

    I will only be overclocking no games or nothing,


    D2OL will be on and off this summer due to heat
    man, i thought i was wierd, and then i started hanging out here at Xtreme Systems-Disposibleteen
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    Rig1-Sempron2800+,ABIT NF7-S REV 2.0,Radeon9200se,No-Name350watt PSU,
    Maxtor80gigs harddrive,K-Byte 256mb pc2100 & Ultra 256 pc2100 Ram, No-Name CD-Rw Drive

    -----------------------------------------------------------

  2. #2
    XS D2OL & RAM News
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Somewhere, USA
    Posts
    3,589
    I like SuSE, but really any distro should work fine. Check out the suse linux ftp servers, you can get a copy of SuSE 9.1 personal.

    jjcom

  3. #3
    Xtreme Recruit
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    90
    I don't think you'll find that any distros are better than any others strictly for overclocking. Just use whichever one you like best.

  4. #4
    D²OL 4 Life
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    166
    ok thanks shall try suse


    D2OL will be on and off this summer due to heat
    man, i thought i was wierd, and then i started hanging out here at Xtreme Systems-Disposibleteen
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    Rig1-Sempron2800+,ABIT NF7-S REV 2.0,Radeon9200se,No-Name350watt PSU,
    Maxtor80gigs harddrive,K-Byte 256mb pc2100 & Ultra 256 pc2100 Ram, No-Name CD-Rw Drive

    -----------------------------------------------------------

  5. #5
    Xtreme Gentoo User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,468
    There's no best distro for overclocking, it's all a matter of taste. I am, myself, a Debian guy. But yeah, SuSE is definately worth a try.

  6. #6
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    suse 64-bit edition

    Perkam

  7. #7
    XS News
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,115
    Gentoo :P

    But Gentoo takes too much of a time to compile...

    I'd go with Mandrake, or Suse.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The Moral Lowground
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by shadowing
    Gentoo :P

    But Gentoo takes too much of a time to compile...
    Try VidaLinux OS. Its Gentoo but without all the hassle. http://desktop.vidalinux.com/

    Cya.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SC, USA
    Posts
    487
    SuSe 9.3 should be out mid-april with lots of improvement. I Agree with Perkam, SuSe 64 bit all the way!!
    Core 2 Duo E6600 [L625A] 3330MHz 1.375Vcore 24/7
    Core 2 Duo E6600 [L640F] 3330MHz 1.475Vcore
    Crucial 10th Anv 2 x 1GB DDR2-667 @ 463MHz 4-4-4-12
    ASUS P5B Dlx
    FOTRON BLUE STORM 500W
    TT BT with stock Fan
    Gigabyte Nvidia 7600GSw/ Silent Pipe
    WD Cavier 250GB
    Antec P160

  10. #10
    XS News
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,115
    There's only one flaw with Suse. It uses the ReiserFS system. The ReiserFS is pretty unstable...

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    47
    fedoracore 64bit edition, apparantly thats rather good

  12. #12
    Xtreme Gentoo User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,468
    Yeah, I lost faith in ReiserFS a while ago when I lost an entire partition suddenly and could never recover it. Now I'm sticking with the old, slow, and reliable Ext3.

  13. #13
    XS D2OL & RAM News
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Somewhere, USA
    Posts
    3,589
    Can't you choose how you want the drive formated? I know you can choose in 9.0, did they change it in 9.1 or 9.2?

    jjcom

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    royal oak, mi
    Posts
    124
    Quote Originally Posted by masterofpuppets
    Yeah, I lost faith in ReiserFS a while ago when I lost an entire partition suddenly and could never recover it. Now I'm sticking with the old, slow, and reliable Ext3.
    i too am converting back to ext3. i keep hearing of problems w/ 2.4 and reiser. now, the reiser package for debian requires 2.6.

    one of my disks lost its reiser journal/index in a reboot. a quick repair put everything into one directory...all 110gb of it. i restored/reorganized what i didn't have elsewhere and restored the rest from another box (redundancy rocks! )

  15. #15
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    113
    Slackware was stable more so than windows on my last system when overclocked. I agree about using ext3 or maybe ext2, most other file systems I've tried tend to bug out with overclocking when you hit higher clocks.
    Winchester 3000+ (CBBHD 0448 SPAW) @ 2.6GHz 1.440 VCore
    DFI LP NF4 SLI-DR
    GSkill LE 2x512MB @ 290MHz 2.5-4-3-7 3.0VDIMM
    ATI Radeon X800XT @ 540/510
    PCP&C 510 Deluxe SLI
    All Stock cooling
    Saitek Gaming Keyboard + Razor Diamondback Mouse

  16. #16
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    840
    Anyone tried Fedora Core 3 for O/C and running folding@home? I'm trying it out, once I get all the updates for the home desktop version on 2nd PC sig spec machine. (see below)
    Signature? are you kidding? with new stuff coming out every day, why bother ?

  17. #17
    XS D2OL & RAM News
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Somewhere, USA
    Posts
    3,589
    I found something out...in SuSE, 2.16ghz is stable, but in Windows, 2.25ghz is stable and my D2OL output on that rig goes up.

    jjcom

  18. #18
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    657
    Debian

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    192.168.0.1
    Posts
    128
    RED HAT 9.0 by far the best linux i've ever used. and i have been using linux for a few years and i've tryed all of them from debrain all the way to suse to yellow dog. red hats just stable easy to use and a good software bundle in general.
    my cs server:
    amd xp 2600
    abit nf7s v2 with vmods
    ati radeon 9800 xt
    hyper x pc3500 2x256
    ttgi 520 psupply
    eheim 315 gph pump
    dangerden nbridge&GPU block
    x-flow (modded) cpu block
    lian li pc75(black)
    running stable every day use at 2446@10.5*232

  20. #20
    Xtreme Gentoo User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,468
    I disagree. It's terribly out of date from the box, uses a 2.4 kernel (ARGH TEH SLOWNESS), and is from Red Hat (who I hate with a passion).

  21. #21
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    657
    Quote Originally Posted by masterofpuppets
    I disagree. It's terribly out of date from the box, uses a 2.4 kernel (ARGH TEH SLOWNESS), and is from Red Hat (who I hate with a passion).
    I agree. I prefer Debian or Slackware.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Gentoo User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,468
    Gentoo has grown on me alot. Just done a stage1 install on my Pentium II! took hours to bootstrap!!!

  23. #23
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    657
    Out of all the distros I have tried I have never tried Gentoo.

  24. #24

  25. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    AArhus, Denmark
    Posts
    35
    fedora core 4 works for me.. came out the other day..

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •