View Poll Results: What do you want to see in the next guide?

Voters
97. You may not vote on this poll
  • Samsung UCCC 2GB stability guide

    14 14.43%
  • Winbond BH-UTT low latency stability guide

    22 22.68%
  • TCCD DDR600 2.5-3-3-7 24/7 guide

    59 60.82%
  • No guides anymore, figure it out myself!

    2 2.06%
Page 2 of 20 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 481

Thread: TCCD DDR600+ DFI nF4 Ultra/SLI guide

  1. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    36
    gd guide~~!!
    i love it >3<

  2. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    22
    Hi there,
    First thatks for that guide It's my first post here, so please forgive me my English Everybody are sharing with their experiance, so I'll do the same I've tried to reach stable 2,5-3-3-6, but I have no idea how to do it I've tried settigs that kakaroto posted here, I've tried also things he called "when those settings are not stable" and nothin' I have closed case, zalman F2 (low) on the window of case, 2 80mm Thermaltakes on the side and zalman 7000b (low). I'm trying to reach that score in "everyday conditions". Increasing vddr does nothin', better cooling the same. Now I'm testin' 2,5-4-3-6 in windows memtest. It's 800% without error so far. If that settings will be stable It will be ok, but I'm afraid that I would not reach highest frequency (310-315) with nice timings (2,5)

    EDIT:
    I've tried 2,5-4-3-6 on 310 and had errors in #5 so I increased Trp to 4 and #5 was passed... but errors in #8
    Last edited by Crosis; 03-29-2005 at 12:02 AM.

  3. #28
    Bandwidth Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by flexy
    hi kakaroto,

    thanks for the posting and the screenshots.


    i have more information coming after a weekend and today tweaking and benching and priming without end Btw. i have a winnie week 42 3500+, dfi ultra-d, 310p bios, the two OCZ 3200 rev2s...X-120 heatsink

    .......................................
    .......................................
    .......................................

    It MIGHT be that these highly tweaked settings are only good for CPUs at stock speed....eg. you can run your memory at those speeds and the CPU can handle the tight latency if its not overclocked....and if the CPU is already on the edge (like mine w/ 2600mhz)...it just cannot handle the latency ?
    Your are totally right with that!, Memtest86++ test5 is far from 100% stable in windows (Prime95 long time stressing)
    To get your memory fully stable, I think you must run the STD for some passes (~ 1 hour) and test 8 for a long time.

    The memorycontroller is implemented in the core, but I think when the CPU is on the edge, this must have influence to the memorycontroller. But I haven't tested that so..

    Quote Originally Posted by Crosis
    Hi there,
    First thatks for that guide It's my first post here, so please forgive me my English Everybody are sharing with their experiance, so I'll do the same I've tried to reach stable 2,5-3-3-6, but I have no idea how to do it I've tried settigs that kakaroto posted here, I've tried also things he called "when those settings are not stable" and nothin' I have closed case, zalman F2 (low) on the window of case, 2 80mm Thermaltakes on the side and zalman 7000b (low). I'm trying to reach that score in "everyday conditions". Increasing vddr does nothin', better cooling the same. Now I'm testin' 2,5-4-3-6 in windows memtest. It's 800% without error so far. If that settings will be stable It will be ok, but I'm afraid that I would not reach highest frequency (310-315) with nice timings (2,5)

    EDIT:
    I've tried 2,5-4-3-6 on 310 and had errors in #5 so I increased Trp to 4 and #5 was passed... but errors in #8
    First thanks everyone for using the guide, I'm happy it also works on most of the people.

    What is your max stable with 2.5-3-3-6 1T @2.6~2.7v. If you get a speed working stable you can work further with that speed.
    Last edited by kakaroto; 03-29-2005 at 08:34 AM.

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by kakaroto
    The memorycontroller is implemented in the core, but I think when the CPU is on the edge, this must have influence to the memorycontroller. But I haven't tested that so..
    Probably old news...but tweaking various "memory" settings has quite a significant influence on how high you can overclock your CPU.

    Maybe some people who run at a wall w/ their CPU should just relax some memory timings and might get a suprise because their CPU might overclock far better.

    It might be old news for the Pros but i never saw it from that perspective.....eg. if you overclock CPU you think HTT, Core Voltage....but never really the memory timiings. Yesterday in some tests (OCCT, Prime) etc. i came close to 2700 with my winnie which had a hard time before reaching eg. 2610...

    But..of course there are always trade-offs...if you increase latency and timings to get more mhz on the CPU you might lose a similliar amount on the memory (because the timings)...and..after all....the overall performance is the same.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    458
    I noticed that you placed Winchesters, Newcastles and Venice all in the "low to mid-range" of CPUs. While Clawhammers are in the high end, but you didn't include 3500+ Clawhammers in there. What are your thoughts (if any) on the quality of the memory controller of the 3500+ Clawhammers?

    Great guide! I had no idea the number of Winchesters with a poor memory controller was so high!

    6/10!!!
    DFI nF4 Ultra-D
    1 GB of OCZ PC3700EL Platinum TCCD
    AMD 3500+ Clawhammer (XP-120)
    eVGA 6200 -> 6600 softmod

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Alpharetta, GA
    Posts
    423
    Awesome! This is just what I was looking for!!!

    One thing I would say is that TCCD gets hot at any voltage. Active cooling is definitely advisable.
    Current system:
    Case: Modded Watercooled Jpac
    CPU: Intel Q6600 @ 3.5GHz [1.47v] - OCCT stable
    Mobo: DFI LanParty Jr T2RS @ 432fsb [1.37v]
    RAM: Crucial Ballistix Tracer 4*1GB DDR2 @ DDR1095 (5-4-5-15) [2.2v]
    HD: WD 300GB Velociraptor / WD 640GB Caviar
    GPU: HD 4850 Crossfire @ (700 | 2200)
    PSU: OCZ ModXstream 780w

  7. #32
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Orlando, Florida USA
    Posts
    206
    Props on a sick ram guide. Thanks for taking the time to make this, it should assist a lot of people in reaching their overclocking goals. I will let you know what it does for me when I get my tax return -> san diego/venice

  8. #33
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    PORTUGAL
    Posts
    172
    Hi there,

    First of all, thank you for this guide!

    But I have a problem here, those settings seem to work fine @ 1:1, but with the 180 divider, I cannot have my mems stable at 282MHz.


    My rig is:
    A64 3000+ @ 3100MHz, S&M 1.51 stable (Prommy cooled)
    DFI NF4 Ultra-D
    OCZ Powerstream 520W
    ATI X850XT PE
    4x 160 @ RAID0
    and of course, 2x 512 GsKill 4800LA




    Any help will be much appreciated



    Thankx

  9. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by kakaroto
    What is your max stable with 2.5-3-3-6 1T @2.6~2.7v.
    Really? I haven't tried yet :P I've just tried 275 and 300.
    If you get a speed working stable you can work further with that speed.
    In Poland we have a small competition in SuperPi 16M, and I have some results to defeat :P So I'm searching for the best timings at ~315.
    ..:: C2D E4300 @ 3GHz 1,325V
    ..:: Abit AB9 Pro
    ..:: Zalman CNPS 7000B-Cu LED
    ..:: PDP Patriot PC6400LLK 2x1GB
    ..:: HiS X800GTO iTurbo + Zamlan VF700-Cu
    ..:: SoundBlaster Audigy 2 @ Audigy 4 drivers
    ..:: ToPower P5 500W
    ..:: Logitech UltraX + Logitech G5 + Steelpad QCK

  10. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    44
    Nice guide again
    I have tested my Gskill TCCD too, with a lot of different settings.

    My settings are almost the same as this guide now, but I have 2 different vallues:

    Tref:
    A value of 4708 will not result any error in Test #5 of memtest, I have 40 passes without an error. But when I run the STD test, 2-6 errors will pop up in test 3 and 4 each round. Even on a frequency of 260 mhz (haven't test lower than that).
    When I changed this value to 3072 cycles, the errors are gone
    This is a little bit strange, because it's faster and, in theory, it will result in less stability. I have talked about this with Kakaroto, and he saw the same problem. It seems TCCD loves Tref 3072c more than 4708c.

    TRC:
    The other differrent value is the TRC. Reducing this value to 8 (guide: 12) doesn't hit the stability of my system, but it gives a better bandwitdh (3099 MB/s --> 3297MB/s in memtest on ddr600)

    So this will be my optimized memory configuration:

    BIOS Settings

    Vddr: 2.7-2.9v (2.9volt performs best here)
    Tcl: 2.5
    Trcd: 3
    Tras: 6
    Trp: 3
    Trc: 8
    Trfc: 14
    Trrd: 2
    Twr: 2
    Twrt: 2
    Trwt: 2
    Tref: 3072(200MHz 3.9us)
    Twcl: 1

    Bank int.: Enable
    Skew control: 255 +
    Drive strength: 7
    Data strength: 4
    Max. Async: 8ns
    Read Preamble: 5ns
    Idle Cycle: AUTO
    Dyn. Counter: Enable
    R/W Bypass: 16x
    Bypass Max: 7x
    32Bit Gran.: Disable
    Last edited by Tutti-frutti; 03-29-2005 at 11:50 AM.

  11. #36
    Bandwidth Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Tutti-frutti
    Nice guide again
    I have tested my Gskill TCCD too, with a lot of different settings.

    My settings are almost the same as this guide now, but I have 2 different vallues:

    Tref:
    A value of 4708 will not result any error in Test #5 of memtest, I have 40 passes without an error. But when I run the STD test, 2-6 errors will pop up in test 3 and 4 each round. Even on a frequency of 260 mhz (haven't test lower than that).
    When I changed this value to 3072 cycles, the errors are gone
    This is a little bit strange, because it's faster and, in theory, it will result in less stability. I have talked about this with Kakaroto, and he saw the same problem. It seems TCCD loves Tref 3072c more than 4708c.

    TRC:
    The other differrent value is the TRC. Reducing this value to 8 (guide: 12) doesn't hit the stability of my system, but it gives a better bandwitdh (3099 MB/s --> 3297MB/s in memtest on ddr600)

    So this will be my optimized memory configuration:

    BIOS Settings

    Vddr: 2.7-2.9v (2.9volt performs best here)
    Tcl: 2.5
    Trcd: 3
    Tras: 6
    Trp: 3
    Trc: 8
    Trfc: 14
    Trrd: 2
    Twr: 2
    Twrt: 2
    Trwt: 2
    Tref: 3072(200MHz 3.9us)
    Twcl: 1

    Bank int.: Enable
    Skew control: 255 +
    Drive strength: 7
    Data strength: 4
    Max. Async: 8ns
    Read Preamble: 5ns
    Idle Cycle: AUTO
    Dyn. Counter: Enable
    R/W Bypass: 16x
    Bypass Max: 7x
    32Bit Gran.: Disable
    Thanks Tutti-fruti, this finding is very nice

  12. #37
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,692
    I thought the Bank Interleave need to be disable for stability?

  13. #38
    Bandwidth Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by ben805
    I thought the Bank Interleave need to be disable for stability?
    Interleaving allows banks with RAM to alternate their refresh and access cycles.
    If 2x dimms (double sided) is used (2x 512), I recommend Interleaving mode. (4-way)
    When you use single sided dimms (2x256), I recommend disable Interleaving mode (2-way) for best functionality.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    PORTUGAL
    Posts
    172
    Kakaroto: and how about when using the 180 divider?...Mine works more or les fine @ 1:1, but with the 180 divider, it's a no go...



    Thankx

  15. #40
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    for BH-5 2x 512MB interleaving caused instability but for 2x 512MB TCCD they were more stable with interleaving
    ---

  16. #41
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    936
    So if you use all the settings mentioned above in tuti fruti's post and your comp posts at 230 fsb 2x512, but reboots after it gets into windows and loads everything, how do you fix that? This might help some of u too, run your ram 2t, this helped me out, but I think I corrupted my inital os install so I have to reformat now :/ On a differnt note, anyone know what I can do for 1t settings and stopping the reboot? I was using 310p bios for this, I'm switching back to 2-17 and trying the settings now after a fresh install. I have seen you guys talk about ram timings, but what about the other voltages for the MB like LDT and chipset etc...here goes 1 long night of testing...
    ALIENS are bringing my next kentsfield based rig in a UFO case!

  17. #42
    Evil Kitty
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    3,305
    Quote Originally Posted by Tutti-frutti
    Tref:
    A value of 4708 will not result any error in Test #5 of memtest, I have 40 passes without an error. But when I run the STD test, 2-6 errors will pop up in test 3 and 4 each round. Even on a frequency of 260 mhz (haven't test lower than that).
    When I changed this value to 3072 cycles, the errors are gone
    This is a little bit strange, because it's faster and, in theory, it will result in less stability. I have talked about this with Kakaroto, and he saw the same problem. It seems TCCD loves Tref 3072c more than 4708c.
    Same experiences here. I run all of my GSkill DFI combos with a Tref of 3072.
    9900k @ 5.1Ghz
    Asus Maximus Hero XI
    32GB (8 x 4) Gskill @4000
    Strix 2080 Ti OC
    OS & Apps: Samsung 970 Pro 512GB
    Games: Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
    Storage: Crucial M500 2TB
    Seasonic Platinum 1000W
    Phanteks Evolv X

  18. #43
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    Quote Originally Posted by mdzcpa
    Same experiences here. I run all of my GSkill DFI combos with a Tref of 3072.
    When I run super pi, I set 100, 1.95
    3072 can be normal using purpose.

  19. #44
    Evil Kitty
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    3,305
    Quote Originally Posted by Onepagebook
    When I run super pi, I set 100, 1.95
    3072 can be normal using purpose.
    Thanks for the tip, I'll give that a try for benching

    And, yes, the 3072 is for 24/7 use
    9900k @ 5.1Ghz
    Asus Maximus Hero XI
    32GB (8 x 4) Gskill @4000
    Strix 2080 Ti OC
    OS & Apps: Samsung 970 Pro 512GB
    Games: Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
    Storage: Crucial M500 2TB
    Seasonic Platinum 1000W
    Phanteks Evolv X

  20. #45
    Brilliant Idiot
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hell on Earth
    Posts
    11,015
    Great guide thx I just purchased 2x256mb sticks of F1 LA and ill be using this guide to try t hit 8x300. very informative
    heatware chew*
    I've got no strings to hold me down.
    To make me fret, or make me frown.
    I had strings but now I'm free.
    There are no strings on me

  21. #46
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    Quote Originally Posted by mdzcpa
    Thanks for the tip, I'll give that a try for benching

    And, yes, the 3072 is for 24/7 use
    my 2 sets of 2x 512MB Gskill PC4400LE 431 only hit 290mhz 2.5-4-3-7 1T at 2.9v (2.7 and 2.8v errors) on DFI NF4 SLI-D with 310 bios in memtest and 3072 was most stable, with new 325 beta bios 3120 TREF was more stable
    Last edited by eva2000; 03-29-2005 at 07:05 PM.
    ---

  22. #47
    Bandwidth Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir Lancelot
    Kakaroto: and how about when using the 180 divider?...Mine works more or les fine @ 1:1, but with the 180 divider, it's a no go...



    Thankx
    That a mobo bug I guess. I have troubles with high HTT with MP8 and 9.

  23. #48
    xtreme energy
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Europe, Latvia
    Posts
    4,145
    I've mainly used memtest and prime. Is STD some memory stability test? Link to download? Couldn't find it in google.

    What about chipset and LDT voltage? Any suggested values? 1.3 and 1.7 is nice I guess.
    ...

  24. #49
    Bandwidth Freak
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    967
    Quote Originally Posted by kiwi
    I've mainly used memtest and prime. Is STD some memory stability test? Link to download? Couldn't find it in google.

    What about chipset and LDT voltage? Any suggested values? 1.3 and 1.7 is nice I guess.
    Noooo STD is a testing procedure in Memtest86++. You can select the test with "test selection"

    Ik use 290MHz HTT with 1.2 LDT / 1.5v chipset.

  25. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    14
    Thanks for the great guide, I have just received my Gskill GBLA today

    Tests for this week-end on my DFI Nf4 Ultra

Page 2 of 20 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •