Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: LS + FX-55 Results and questions

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    330

    LS + FX-55 Results and questions

    I have been playing with my FX-55 on different coolers for a while now, and I finally decided to use my LS as a 24/7 rig and put the FX-55 in it. This FX-55 is a CAAZC 0441 that I've seen alot of people get bad results from, but mine has been great

    I run it 24/7 at 3245MHz with only 1.6v and -50C temps on the LS. I'm happy with this, but a bit puzzled by the SiSandra scores I'm getting. Anytime I use w2k pro over XP, I normally score about 400 points lower in the mem tests, and about 1000 points lower in the CPU test...is this normal? The 2001 scores show a big improvement however? Is this just a w2k / Sandra thing?

    Oh yeah, here's some SS:

    3245MHz, 1.65v in BIOS. I can now run at same speed but with 1.6v


    SuperPI @ 295x11 2.5-3-3-7 2.7v on the RAM:


    Sandra MEM bench: (With XP Pro I can get about 9K?)


    3300MHz: 24HR Prime Stable at 1.75v, only takes 1.65v for 3300MHz 12+HR now


    3.3GHz on 1.65v isn't bad, and that gives me plenty of room to shot for more. The temps are good, and the RAM still has plenty left
    Shock'D:
    CPU: Intel 2500k @ 5.0GHz
    Motherboard: ASUS MIVE
    RAM: GSKill 1866 @ 7-9-7-24
    Video: 2 x HD6970 @ 940/1425
    PSU: Corsair AX1200W
    Case: Custom TJ07
    Cooling: Cooled by EK and HWLabs

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Manchester (UK)
    Posts
    1,105
    seems a pretty nice fx you got there... 3300mhz prime stable is good. i wouldnt mind about the voltage when using phase change, i dont even when using air

    how about suicide screenies for some eye candy ?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    330
    I'll get some top speed runs later this week. I am out of town right now, but I'll get them asap.
    Shock'D:
    CPU: Intel 2500k @ 5.0GHz
    Motherboard: ASUS MIVE
    RAM: GSKill 1866 @ 7-9-7-24
    Video: 2 x HD6970 @ 940/1425
    PSU: Corsair AX1200W
    Case: Custom TJ07
    Cooling: Cooled by EK and HWLabs

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    950
    Voltage! More Voltage!!
    £58.73 - This is the amount of money a loyal customer is worth to Overclockers.co.uk

    Beware of buying from overclockers.co.uk, they will swindle you by abusing the consumer law if they need to refund you for faulty hardware. Thieving gits

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    632
    Quote Originally Posted by Frost_Bite
    I have been playing with my FX-55 on different coolers for a while now, and I finally decided to use my LS as a 24/7 rig and put the FX-55 in it. This FX-55 is a CAAZC 0441 that I've seen alot of people get bad results from, but mine has been great

    I run it 24/7 at 3245MHz with only 1.6v and -50C temps on the LS. I'm happy with this, but a bit puzzled by the SiSandra scores I'm getting. Anytime I use w2k pro over XP, I normally score about 400 points lower in the mem tests, and about 1000 points lower in the CPU test...is this normal? The 2001 scores show a big improvement however? Is this just a w2k / Sandra thing?

    Oh yeah, here's some SS:

    3245MHz, 1.65v in BIOS. I can now run at same speed but with 1.6v


    SuperPI @ 295x11 2.5-3-3-7 2.7v on the RAM:


    Sandra MEM bench: (With XP Pro I can get about 9K?)


    3300MHz: 24HR Prime Stable at 1.75v, only takes 1.65v for 3300MHz 12+HR now


    3.3GHz on 1.65v isn't bad, and that gives me plenty of room to shot for more. The temps are good, and the RAM still has plenty left
    The bad FX55 you are talking about is the one i have which is week something like 05. It takes me 1.825 volts just to get to 3.2 gighertz
    Tba

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •