1.4 and are you sure you're just not experiencing vdroop?Originally Posted by sabrewulf165
1.4 and are you sure you're just not experiencing vdroop?Originally Posted by sabrewulf165
Looking good so far, s7e9h3n
Cause it's working well under phase I am quite happy. I hope San Diego will do as well
BTW. Does your nick mean: Stephen?!?
It is not considered as a cheat. A lot of people do itOriginally Posted by s7e9h3n
And if you like to save the screenie in Kunaak's way(800x600 70%), I see no reason why you shouldn't take this screenie in a full quality.
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ NewCastle @ 240 x 10 = 2400 MHz @ 1.550 V
MSI K8N Neo Platinum 1.52 Beta BIOS
2x 512 MB DDR500 A-DATA Vitesta Hynix @ 240 MHz 1:1 2.5-3-3-7 1T 2.85V 24/7
Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro R350
Enermax EG365AX-VE FMA 3.3V@32A 5V@32A 12V@26A
DVD-RW TEAC
Seagate 200 GB SATA + Maxtor 300 GB SATA
Yes, all 90nm parts have at least 1st gen strained silicon. These may (or may not, we don't know for sure yet) have second generation strained silicon, known as "DSL" (Dual Stress Liner).Originally Posted by leviathan18
Interesting that your CPU-Zs show 1.36v on a lot of the "stock" runs with air cooling. Are you deliberately undervolting slightly, or is that just happening despite being set to 1.4v in the BIOS?Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
Actually it's set to "default Cpu VID" (or something like that) in bios. 1.4 is default vcore for the venice. 1.36 is probably due to the motherboard undervolting a bit. Anybody wanna send me an Ultra-D to test with this cpu?Originally Posted by terrace215
It would cost less for postage if you sent me the cpu to test it in the dfiOriginally Posted by s7e9h3n
Yep, I have a complete retail box Ultra-D on the shelf.... you wanna send me the 3500 to test I will send you the DFI to test. LMK!!Originally Posted by s7e9h3n
:banana4:
.................................................. .................................................. .............................................
[+] Abit AN8 Fatal1ty [+] A64 3500+ NC [+] XP120 [+] 2x256 G.Skill DDR600 "LA" [+] MSI 6600GT [+] OCZ 420w Powerstream [+]
.................................................. .................................................. .............................................
Looks great!
It would be nice if AMD had a processor spec list like Intel's Sspec page on their site.
THanks conrad. OMG i posted only 2 hours ago and its 2 pages ahead Will check them out, thx for 2945 linky and OMG Conrad when'd u go mod ??? And lets some benchies in ur sig man !!!Check back a few pages. I think he's playing in this temperature range.
I still wanna see some 3200+/3000+ benchies though before I'm completely conveniced .
Perkam
I'm loving the looks of this Venice core. Hopefully the rest are as awesome as this chip.
P.S. Are you going to test the 3500+ ?
Very nicely done so far s7e9h3n
Would really like to see how the on-die mem controller does on that puppy
Maybe a "tightest timings TCCD, 4 DIMMs" with you FX and then with the Venice? (you could do it with 2 DIMMs, but the difference would probably show up more with 4) Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease.
Thought part of the whole point of doing Venice/SanDiego was to implement the IBM version of Strained Silicon.... aka Super Strained Silicon. Along with SSE3 and better memory controller.
GA-MA790GP-D4SH, 965BE, 3.8Ghz
Ultra120E, 4x2G Gskill 1066
2x 150G VRaptor raid, WD640AALS
8800GT 735/940/1685, LG-BluRay
Well, the cold bug appears gone, SSE3 was verified, so that leaves the mem controller As far as the SS question... something fixed the cold bug... and from the temps at volts, it appears they've cut down further on the leakage current
dose the coldbug have any relationship to the memory controller?Originally Posted by EMC2
Yes. This thread is definitely popular. Since s7e9h3n first posted yesterday just after 1:00PM, this thread has been hit almost 38,000 times. Notice that the moment s7e9h3n puts up a screenshot, the posts start accumulating. Everyone has been waiting a long time for this.Originally Posted by perkam
As for moderating: I woke up yesterday and noticed Kazoo and friends at my door. FUGGER was in the background next to his pimped out Benz S600 sitting low on 24" Lowenharts wrapped in Pirelli P-Zero rubbers. chilly1 instructs him to pop the trunk and reaches for a Louis Vuitton duffle bag. They both commence to walk toward my door and post up next to Kazoo. chilly1 drops the bag and a fat stash of bundled cash makes its way out of the designer pouch. Kazoo hands me a badge that reads XtremeSystems Bodybag Crew and mumbles, "It's time to clean house." FUGGER looks me in the eye and says, "Make sure you do a good job." I put the badge on, shut the door, and log on to XS. The end.
Unknown, but unlikely, could be an initialization problem most anywhere in the chip... I simply meant that the main Q left to be answered was what is the improvement in the mem controller on the VeniceOriginally Posted by bugeyes
--- Conrad ---
SERIOUSLY OT:
^Dude, that sounds so cool. No, seriously.Originally Posted by conrad.maranan
Uhh... lower speed rating Venice action? I wanna see a 3000+ hit 2.9GHz stable on air. Please? Anyone? AMD, are you there? April is so far away...
7700k @ 5.0GHz
ASUS Z170-Deluxe
2x8GB Avexir Raiden DDR4-3000 15-15-15-35
Gigabyte Aorus 1080 Ti @ 2076/1500(6000)
512GB Samsung PM961 + 840 Pro 256GB + some TBs
Corsair AX1200i
X-Star DP2710LED @ 110Hz + 40" Samsung TV
CPU and GPU under water: 9x120 rad + 3x120 + 3x120
...and an HTC Vive!
hmmm...2.9ghz would be 9x322 so someone with Venice + Gskill or Plat2 could do it, though it would be easier with a 3200's 10x multi : only 290 fsb required which many tccd can do.Uhh... lower speed rating Venice action? I wanna see a 3000+ hit 2.9GHz stable on air. Please? Anyone? AMD, are you there? April is so far away...
Perkam
322x9 w/ a 166Mhz memory lock would suit me and my UTT sticks just fine.
Giga UD4P - i7 920 - 6x2GB STT DDR3 - 2x Visiontek HD 4850 - Adaptec 3085 - 2x32GB Patriot Warp - 4x320GB Seagate ES RAID5 - DD TDX - Ultra X3 800
I think you forgot about dividers hereOriginally Posted by perkam
322x9 divider166 = 263MHz --> good for some 6-2-2-2.0-1T BH-5 action
322x9 divider180 (on some boards, like DFI NF4) = 290MHz ---> great for some good clocking TCCD @ 7-3-3-2.5-1T
so, I think 2900MHz on 3000+ is still doable
But still 322 2.5-4-3-7 is doable on G.Skill memory (at least mine does 325) with OPB's (holy) timingsOriginally Posted by bachus_anonym
http://www.sbs.o.se/default.asp?artnr=ADA3500BPBOXOriginally Posted by Pjotr
Caper
I expected more. However, first winchesters SUCKED and later ones got better So I think we can expect the same thing to happen here as well. Venice doesn't suck to begin with, so it will hopefully get close to 3.2 on AIR by Q3-Q4.
For non-believers remember FX-51 needing serious phase to get to 2.8 and some FX-53's getting there on air
i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60Originally Posted by CompGeek
I would love to see the 3500+ results now.
Bookmarks