It might just be that english isn't my first language, but that post was damn confusing...Originally Posted by thomasxstewart
It might just be that english isn't my first language, but that post was damn confusing...Originally Posted by thomasxstewart
i'm a physician, but i'm not as weird as thomasxstewart. while i was reading that post, a few bars of the 'twilight zone' jingle kept repeating in my head. please keep posting, i'm intrigued.
back on topic, i think the major thing everyone on this site is interested in with the fx57 is it's compatibility with subzero cooling. if the price on these chips weren't so outrageously high, i'd take a chance to test one out.
Last edited by jikdoc; 03-11-2005 at 10:08 AM.
i7 980x | corsair dominator 6x4 Gb | TJ07
SLI GTX 580x2 | GT430 | rampage 3 | corsair AX1200
LSI 9265 | OCZ vertex 128x4 raid0 | corsair c300 | hitachi 3tbx3 |
blocks: cpu hk 3.0 | gpu aquacomputer 580x2 | mb ek re3 fc | ram bitspower galaxy
pump: laing d5 x2 | res: koolance 452x2
rad: TC 120.3 120.2 | scythe GTx5
NASs: qnap 879 8x3tb | thecus N5200 2tbx5
At least i'm not the only oneOriginally Posted by Mikael
So has AMD just given up on the whole "939 A64's will be 512k parts" philosophy?
When (if at all?) will we see cheaper 2.6ghz / 512k parts?
I dont think we will see these pieces until 2600mhz becomes "mid-range" which is not going to be before the shrink to 65nm. Just speculation!Originally Posted by sabrewulf165
AMD's road map seems to fall of the face of the earth after 2005. Could this mean the end of the world?
Last edited by blueworm; 03-11-2005 at 11:34 PM.
Registered linux user #271604 Get Counted! http://counter.li.org/
Lian Li PC60, OCZ powerStream 520W PSU,MSI K8N Neo, athlon64 3400+(@220x11),Thermalright XP90C, 1Gb Kingston HyperX (TCCD), Gainward GS 6800GT(@400/1115), Zalman-VF700-Cu, TB SantaCruz, M-audio revolution7.1 > pimeta amp > hd595
As long as I can get my hands on a cheap Venice and they OC like I've heard they can, I don't really careOriginally Posted by blueworm
Nobody has a venice sofar i have seen so you cant now how the oc?Originally Posted by sabrewulf165
I don't know, I'm just going off of hearsay and rumors.Originally Posted by Ferry82
I just heard from my supplier that I will get an FX55 on tuesday (while there are 50 in backorder) How can this be?
Intel Core i7-3770K
ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
EVGA GTX 970 SC
Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
Corsair H80
120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
Corsair RM650
Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v
well amd's roadmap shows Venice going to at least 2.8GHz so its natural we can assume those to overclock to at least that with subsquent batches only improving from there and hitting over 3GHz. as for that fx55, it may be 130nm, avoid it, get a fx57 shortly!
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
What tells you that this is a Rev E A64 4200+, as opposed to a Rev E FX-55?
Did AMD indicate this was a sample for the former?
They have the same characteristics, other than overclocking locking.
I ask because a 4200+ part implies an FX-57 part at the same time,(to keep up the FX "fastest part" reputation) but if this is just the 90nm Rev E FX-55, there is no such implication.
Terrace, the cpuid value for the Rev E San Diegos is finalised at 20F71 this ES is 20F70 so I guess it could be either as it is clearly an early sampling.
Well - the arrogance is strong with this one.Originally Posted by thomasxstewart
edit - you would think, being a doctor, that you might be able to correctly spell 'medicine'. Once, and I'd take it as a typo - but twice?
Last edited by Arseface; 03-14-2005 at 02:57 AM.
Originally Posted by thomasxstewart
Previous system:
DFI NF4 ULTRA 0453A3 KOREA CHIPSET / BIOS 510-2FIX / FX-57 0516WPMW@3.62GHZ / 2x256 CORSAIR 3200LLPT BH-5@13x278MHZ 2-2-2-5@3.69VDIMM / MACH II GT@MOD BY BERKUT / ACTIVE COOLING FOR RAM - MOSFETS - GPU RAM / CHIPSET & GPU CORE WATERCOOLED / OCZ POWERSTEAM 600W / BUILT BY ATI X850XT@660/651 - VGPU@1.73-VDD@2.26-VDDQ@2.21 PENCIL MOD / WIN XP 2x80GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP80 SATA - RAID 0 & WIN 2K 40GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP40 IDE BENCH DRIVE / PIC
----------------><------------------
low votle
Yeah, the CPUID isn't going to help here, as really, there is NO DIFFERENCE (but for overclocking locked/unlocked) between the 4000+ and the FX-53, the 4200+ and the FX-55, and the 4400+ and the FX-57.
They are the same parts.
So the question is, did the sample come with any documentation that suggested how AMD was going to label it?
If they are sampling it as a 4200+, it implies they have an FX-57 about to launch with it.
If they are sampling is as the Rev E 90nm FX-55, it doesn't imply that.
We've been assuming it is the 4200+. I was hoping there was some basis for that assumption, and that sxs might comment.
it is a revE K8-939 CPU (F13140 D43NK00) .....that's all I can tell....
I need a bigger wallet
AMD A64 3200+ || Shuttle AN50R || 1GB Corsair 3200LL || Gigacube Radeon 9800pro @ 495/380 || 2x 120GB Hitachi SATA HDD (RAID 0) || Antec 'TrueControl' 550W || 23626 3Dmarks
Don't we all?Originally Posted by Dexter
lolOriginally Posted by Super strokey
Previous system:
DFI NF4 ULTRA 0453A3 KOREA CHIPSET / BIOS 510-2FIX / FX-57 0516WPMW@3.62GHZ / 2x256 CORSAIR 3200LLPT BH-5@13x278MHZ 2-2-2-5@3.69VDIMM / MACH II GT@MOD BY BERKUT / ACTIVE COOLING FOR RAM - MOSFETS - GPU RAM / CHIPSET & GPU CORE WATERCOOLED / OCZ POWERSTEAM 600W / BUILT BY ATI X850XT@660/651 - VGPU@1.73-VDD@2.26-VDDQ@2.21 PENCIL MOD / WIN XP 2x80GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP80 SATA - RAID 0 & WIN 2K 40GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP40 IDE BENCH DRIVE / PIC
----------------><------------------
Obviously your M.D. isn't anything remotley relating to the English languageOriginally Posted by thomasxstewart
3770k @ 5ghz 1.35v linx stable
Asus Maximus V Extreme
8gb Samsung Green @ 2600mhz 11-11-11-31
EVGA GTX 680
Corsair AX850
XSPC Watercooling
the 4200+ and fx57 will be san diego rev E4 and i think they will be released around april 15th, sorry if this is not news, but the last posts of this thread look like you didnt know it was a san diego rev E4.
thnk the 4200 will hit 3.2 under a mach1 or should I go for the fx-57?
3770k @ 5ghz 1.35v linx stable
Asus Maximus V Extreme
8gb Samsung Green @ 2600mhz 11-11-11-31
EVGA GTX 680
Corsair AX850
XSPC Watercooling
"hit" meaning max screenshot speed? the 3800+ venice already did 3.5ghz on a mach2 gt for a screenshot
Where ???Originally Posted by saaya
Previous system:
DFI NF4 ULTRA 0453A3 KOREA CHIPSET / BIOS 510-2FIX / FX-57 0516WPMW@3.62GHZ / 2x256 CORSAIR 3200LLPT BH-5@13x278MHZ 2-2-2-5@3.69VDIMM / MACH II GT@MOD BY BERKUT / ACTIVE COOLING FOR RAM - MOSFETS - GPU RAM / CHIPSET & GPU CORE WATERCOOLED / OCZ POWERSTEAM 600W / BUILT BY ATI X850XT@660/651 - VGPU@1.73-VDD@2.26-VDDQ@2.21 PENCIL MOD / WIN XP 2x80GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP80 SATA - RAID 0 & WIN 2K 40GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP40 IDE BENCH DRIVE / PIC
----------------><------------------
Bookmarks