why would amd suddenly start locking the downward multi's on their chips? i think it's still unlocked below stock for cool&quiet to workOriginally Posted by drcrawn
why would amd suddenly start locking the downward multi's on their chips? i think it's still unlocked below stock for cool&quiet to work
Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them
In case anyone is still interested.....Superpi when my system was at stock was 32secs
[Case] Thermaltake Tsunami {2x 120mm + 1x 92mm}
[Mobo] MSI K8N NEO 2 Nforce 3 Ultra
[CPU] Athlon 64 FX-60 @ Stock
[Cooler] Thermalright XP-90 + Panaflo 92mm
[RAM] 2 x 1GB OCZ EL Plat XTC @ Stock
[Gfx] Sapphire X1950pro @ 614/719
[Sound] Audigy 2 ZS Platinum
[Storage] 2 x WD Caviar 200 GB HD in RAID 0
[Optical] LG 4160 Dual Layer DVD Burner + LG H44N Dual Layer DVD Burner
[PSU] Enermax 550W {+3.3V = 36A}{+5V = 36A}{+12V = 36A}{-5V = 1A}{-12V = 1A}{+5Vsb = 2.2A}
[Net] Draytek 2800G on Aquiss Max (3.5mb)
that's pretty good.. how's the overclocking going?
Got a fan over those memory sticks? No? Well get to it before you kill them
why 'd they do it? No reason.
E5200
Asus P5Q-VM
A-DATA 2x2GB
Zotac 8800GT
500W Seasonic
he seem to be missing from this thread after the two posts.
Asus Rampage Formula X48
Intel Q9650 @ 4.33GHZ
OCZ Platinum DDR2-800
Palit 4870x2
Creative Xi-Fi Extreme Music
Corsair HX1000
LL 343B Case
Thermochill 120.3
2xMCP355
KL 350AT
KL 4870X2 FC WB
DD Chipset Block
no word from him? this sucks and I now dont believe he even has a 4200+otherwise he would have oced by now and activately posting
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
looks quite nice, put this baby under phase or water cooling to get some oc results
System #1:
i7 975 for bench, W3540 @ 4,4 Ghz HT On, Asus P6X58 Premium, 3x2048 Corsair Dominator 2000CL7, Sapphire 5970 @ stock, Corsair HX1000, 1xOCZ Vertex2 120GB, 3x1TB WD Green
Cooled by:
Loop 1: Watercool HK rev 3.0, Laing Ultra 18W /w XSPC Res Top, Thermochill PA120.3 /w Phobya Fans @ 5V Pull
Loop 2: EK 5970 Nickle, Laing Ultra 18W /w XSPC Res Top, Thermochill PA120.3 /w Phobya Fans @ 5V Pull
Loop 3: EK Asus NB/SB, Mips Asus Mosfet 1 + 2, Laing Ultra 18W /w XSPC Res Top, Thermochill PA120.2 /w Phobya Fans @ 5V Pull
4,6Ghz (21x220) 1,42Vcore with Single Stage (HT enabled)
http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/1251/83962063.jpg
AMD @ testing
X4 955, Asus Crosshair III, same Rams as on Intel Setup, Sapphire 4870X2 @ Stock, PC Power&Cooling 910W
the guy posts this and then disapears. something don't smell right.
{2012 27imac-3.4i7-680mx-32gb ram-768SSD+External TB Samsung840pro ssd + TB velociraptors-Moto828mkIII/Marantz/Amphion Sound-HPzR30w 2nd monitor}
wow good cpu
» Newcastle 3200+@2585Mhz Daily use
» DFI Ut nF3 250GB
» 2x256Mb Mushkin PC3200 Level II BH5
» Sapphire X800Pro VIVO@XT PE Stock cooling
» Fortron FSP400-60PN 400w
» CPU Cooled by Ybris K10 Hurican & BIX II
» CM Stacker
or maybe damaged goods...wow good cpu
I think he is from Taiwan.
http://www.digital-info.net/vbb/showthread.php?t=2635
That heatspreader looks wierd.
Last edited by NiCKE^; 03-05-2005 at 01:01 AM.
Intel FTW!
Beanna
that is an intel chip in the second link man... 775 chiips all look like that
lol
this chip looks very promising.. any word when it will hit retail?
and get us some OCing shots
32 at 200x13? damn, sounds like the cache got some latency improvments as well
why does the chip name say 2200+?
Bios cant read 4200+...as said in this thread
What's the max clocks. Dont give a damn about stock benches. FIRE THATUP! :banana4:
NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)
Heatware: 13-0-0
*vader voice* Impressive
I would like to see how it would overclock on a 3 stage cascade
2x 1.6ghz LV Xeons @ 2.8ghz each
Asus NCCH-DL
Corsair XLPT v1.1 1024mb
XFX 6800 GT
sweeeet
have a pic of the heatsink it comes with? does it have heatpipes like the fx55 heatsink? i guess no because it runs much cooler since its a 90nm chip, but maybe were lucky and amd is bundling the same sweet heatsinks of the fx55 chips with them!
I'm almost sure he got it OEM (that is if he's not faking it). He is a. under NDA or b. he stole it or c. he's faking it.sweeeet
have a pic of the heatsink it comes with? does it have heatpipes like the fx55 heatsink? i guess no because it runs much cooler since its a 90nm chip, but maybe were lucky and amd is bundling the same sweet heatsinks of the fx55 chips with them!
anyway this is a nice indication that the fx-57 aint far away after all...
C2D E6300 @ 3.5ghz | 2x1GB ADATA "Micron D9" @ 500 4-4-4-12 2.3v | Asus P5B-E Plus C2 | Sapphire X1900XT 512MB | Tuniq Tower 120
AMD locking the lower multi's would be the stupidest move they could ever make. Nearly the entire enthusiast community would drop them. Not everyone can afford an FX chip.why would amd suddenly start locking the downward multi's on their chips? i think it's still unlocked below stock for cool&quiet to work
I've got a feeling that this will turn out to be one of the new 90nm San-Diego FX55s, rather than the 4200+ (although they should be essentially the same chip). Of course I *hope* it will be a 4200+, as that would imply the imminent release of the FX57, but I'm not getting my hopes up.
But I think we don't have to speculate about it - I bet a monthly income that in the same hour the FX-57 will be released an XS member will post it here so we are all on the safer side here at XS........
Previous system:
----------------><------------------
That is what Iwas trying to say in my post. If I get 32s with a winnie oc'ed and these chips do those speeds stock with 200FSB that is a fairly impressive starting point!
As said, an FX55 on Neo2 also pulls 32s at stock. The potential for these chips looks good. I'd love to see some 3d01 comparisons between this cpu and a FX55.
Now for the waiting game...
I'm pretty sure he's insider.Who else can be X.I.P here under ~200 post ?I'm almost sure he got it OEM (that is if he's not faking it). He is a. under NDA or b. he stole it or c. he's faking it.
anyway this is a nice indication that the fx-57 aint far away after all...
Last edited by Nanobot; 03-04-2005 at 05:13 PM.
Asus P6T Deluxe, Core i7 920 @ 4.1ghz, Corsair Dominator Tri channel 1600Mhz
Evga GTX285, Raptor 150GB, Corsair HX620
Apogee GTZ, PA 120.3, CM Stacker STC-01, DDC 3.1 MCP355/XSPC top.
Win Vista Premium X64
no word from him. I will go and say hes faking it. fx55 and 4000+ diego are imminent but 4200+ is in q3. Venice has been pushed up too so I may have one in a month or so
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks