AMD Athlon64 4200+ TEST First Look

**saaya** · 03-30-2005, 07:54 AM

Originally Posted by HARDCORECLOCKER

Where ???

steven posted a screenshot in the 3500+ preview thread, maybe also in the 3800+ thread, not sure about that.

**Impaqt** · 03-31-2005, 08:21 AM

Originally Posted by terrace215

Yeah, the CPUID isn't going to help here, as really, there is NO DIFFERENCE (but for overclocking locked/unlocked) between the 4000+ and the FX-53, the 4200+ and the FX-55, and the 4400+ and the FX-57.

They are the same parts.
.

THe 4200+ is 90nm. The FX-55 is 130nm. thats NOT the same processor in any sense of the term.

Its mor likely thatthe 4200+ will be a FX-57 thats been downclocked on multi.

**~~terrace215~~** · 03-31-2005, 08:55 AM

Sigh. The *90nm* FX-55, which showed up on disti lists as a future product last month.

That's the question: Is the sample a 4200+, or a 90nm FX-55? That is, how will it be branded? The former *implies* AMD will launch the FX-57 (at 2.8GHz) at the same time as the 4200+. If it is merely to be launched as the 90nm Rev E FX-55, no such implication is there, and it will probably be Q3 before we see the FX-57.

**a.p.versteeg** · 04-04-2005, 11:38 AM

Like this one?

**charlie** · 04-04-2005, 11:41 AM

Originally Posted by a.p.versteeg

Like this one?

ok

you have our undivided attention, now how's it clock?

C

**a.p.versteeg** · 04-04-2005, 11:43 AM

Originally Posted by charlie

ok

you have our undivided attention, now how's it clock?

C

Wait and we will see when we are alowed to show.

**EvilWhiteDragon** · 04-04-2005, 12:20 PM

apversteeg I hate you :P ... why do you have to post pictures of it and you don't/can't OC it yet ?

**trakslacker** · 04-04-2005, 02:18 PM

I believe he has OC'ed it and knows just waht it can do. However he cant tell the rest of us that just yet.

Just get us the results as soon as you are allowed to.

**Orthogonal** · 04-04-2005, 02:47 PM

a.p.versteeg do you really own that chip? Or did you just take the pic from someone who posted the same thing on that Dutch board someone referred to earlier. Are you the same person?

**krampak** · 04-04-2005, 03:11 PM

He has the same nick, so I guess he is the same person...

**Thorry** · 04-05-2005, 01:18 AM

Originally Posted by Orthogonal

a.p.versteeg do you really own that chip? Or did you just take the pic from someone who posted the same thing on that Dutch board someone referred to earlier. Are you the same person?

He really has it...

Actually he has 2...

**Viss** · 04-07-2005, 03:43 PM

According to himself this is a pic of its performance http://home.wanadoo.nl/a.p.versteeg/3300lowVcore.JPG

**Concorde Rules** · 04-10-2005, 03:00 AM

Oooh thats looks soooo goood!

Im stuck here with my 5th rubbish winnie at 290x9, 166 divider

Im waiting for the 3700+ San Diago. Now that should be good

Concorde

**GoriLLakoS** · 04-10-2005, 05:21 AM

when they will be finally out, ready for buy the 4200 chips??

**Vincentvega18** · 04-10-2005, 10:49 PM

3.3 on stock volts...........and since when has cpu-z recognised the new cores?

**a.p.versteeg** · 04-11-2005, 06:38 AM

Originally Posted by Vincentvega18

3.3 on stock volts...........and since when has cpu-z recognised the new cores?

CPU-Z 1.28 is new and will recognice like you can see

.

**groovetek** · 04-16-2005, 01:56 PM

hahah well your secret is out now... so much for that...

3.3g @1.4vcore is nuts though

**cupra** · 04-17-2005, 09:05 PM

that is nice, but i think that we need to wait and see more benchmarking programs

**Silvermirage** · 01-05-2007, 04:53 PM

Some of these things can be deleated, can't they?

Thread: AMD Athlon64 4200+ TEST First Look

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions