Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 228

Thread: Super PI with msec/anticheat mod

  1. #76
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    214
    That's good to hear

    So.. does anyone have any more ideas for new features? I'm kinda bored

  2. #77
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    3
    Hi! I am facing some strange issues. When I OC my P4 3.0E to 4.3GHz, Super PI will post crazy results. At 4.289GHz, my result is 31.562sec. When I bump my FSB 1 MHz higher, the results became 1hr 51min. Of course, it doesn't take that long to complete (slightly more than 30sec). Just that the time shown for each iteration is wrong.

    I used to face this issue when WinXP couldn't detect anything more than 4.3GHz problerly. SP2 seems to solve that problem but it appears that no all programs are working. Any work around?

    Thanks!

  3. #78
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,734
    @snq

    I've just seen some CRAAAZZYYY time in SuperPi 16M with the latest MOD. Checksum turnes out OK Something that might be similar to above post... Just look for yourself, bud:

    11:30 - P4 3.0EGHz @4501MHz (15x300)

    09:06 - P4 530 3GHz @ 3890MHz (15x259)

    The author of that first score says that he was not cheating and numerous runs show pretty much same results...

    Something must be wrong with that MOD. Can you take a look at it, please ?

  4. #79
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    214
    Hmm.. that's odd.
    An explanation could be that your timers are off at such high clocks. I still use windows timing functions in this version, but I believe this timer relies on clock speed and afaik it's calibrated at boot time. Now I'm not sure exactly how this is done but it could be that sometimes (?) the timer is not recalibrated when you change the clockspeed using clockgen or some other tool?
    Obviously it's a problem tho, I'll see what I can do about it! I just hope I don't have to fall back on the old 15-msec-jump-timing :/

  5. #80
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,734
    Quote Originally Posted by snq
    Hmm.. that's odd.
    An explanation could be that your timers are off at such high clocks. I still use windows timing functions in this version, but I believe this timer relies on clock speed and afaik it's calibrated at boot time. Now I'm not sure exactly how this is done but it could be that sometimes (?) the timer is not recalibrated when you change the clockspeed using clockgen or some other tool?
    Obviously it's a problem tho, I'll see what I can do about it! I just hope I don't have to fall back on the old 15-msec-jump-timing :/
    Well, this person says that with Original SuperPI he gets around 14:00, which is about right... So you might wanna try to poke around and see what could be the problem.... And I think so far this happened only on Intel / Prescott...

  6. #81
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    214
    The problem is I changed the function used to get the time, so the problem has to be there. This is really bad news because I really loved this new function without the weird jumps. But if it's acting like this it will have to go

    Unfortunately I don't have a prescott to test with but I will try starting with a heavily underclocked system and throw up the FSB while in windows, that should show me if this function adjusts properly or not.

  7. #82
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    214
    I don't know anything about clocking Intel CPUs but do those things support HT and if so do you have it enabled?

    If so that could be causing the problem.
    Quote Originally Posted by Microsoft
    On a multiprocessor computer, it should not matter which processor is called. However, you can get different results on different processors due to bugs in the basic input/output system (BIOS) or the hardware abstraction layer (HAL). To specify processor affinity for a thread, use the SetThreadAffinityMask function.

  8. #83
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    214
    Can you guys test this one?
    It has the old timing functions, still msecs but with small jumps. I guess for calculating 16M/32M 15 msecs more or less wont be a big deal

  9. #84
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    3
    Thanks, the new version is working properly now. My CPU is running at 4.35GHz instead of 4.305GHz, thus its no longer 1hr 51m, but

    http://home.no/trac3r/super_pi_mod.zip

    I downloaded from this mirror above and I gotten:



    After downloading the 1.4:



    Its working! Thanks!

  10. #85
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    287
    Good work on the PI updates. Now once everyone can use SSE3 we won't have anything to complain about :p
    DFI SLI-DR | Opteron 170 Mach II | 2x512 G.Skill LE | x1900XTX | 2x250GB Hitachi T7K250 RAID 0 | PCP&C 510 SLI | Creative X-Fi
    My Heatware

  11. #86
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    4,734
    thanks snq,

    I posted this information along with a new link on my native forums... I will let you know how it worked out

  12. #87
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    214
    Quote Originally Posted by scsim
    Its working! Thanks!
    Great I still want the really precise timing back tho. I'm thinking of what I could do to work around this problem. On my own system(s) the amount I clock doesn't affect the timer but I guess windows or the bios freaks out at that speed

  13. #88
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    494
    hmm
    doesn't seem to work with clockgen(nf3 one)?
    It gives out the same time as the speeds in which I boot at

  14. #89
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    214
    ArcTan, that's what I was afraid of. The timer is not reinitialized
    Try this one: http://superpi.radeonx.com/super_pi_mod-1.4.zip

  15. #90
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    494
    thanks
    works now

  16. #91
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    29
    impresive reverse engineering work, good job

  17. #92
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    214
    Thanks Sons of Piru

  18. #93
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    105

    re:

    same settings. :/





    Ciao

  19. #94
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    246
    same the guys abouve, my ptime is still 0.500msm differetn from the originall....
    anti cheat=35.629
    originall=35.140....
    inprouved but still wrong
    The God Father OC.Team

  20. #95
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SLOVENIJA
    Posts
    2,594
    what is NOT EXACT IN ROUND ?

    280*9....prime stable and superpi not ?

    works now with 1.4
    Last edited by TEDY; 03-10-2005 at 06:18 AM.
    ASUS P5K-E // E8400 Q746A519
    G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ
    LC 550W GP// XPERTVISION 9600GT

  21. #96
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    didn't know you had a new version out heh but here's what i managed

    max pifast and superpi 1M able







    ---

  22. #97
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Milan
    Posts
    105

    re:

    small improvement w/ previous version.



    Ciao

  23. #98
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    대한민국 강원도 원주시 Wonju, South Korea
    Posts
    963
    Thank you, SNQ! I might do some old school Athlon XP benching and see if I can't beat my old 36s record.
    7700k @ 5.0GHz
    ASUS Z170-Deluxe
    2x8GB Avexir Raiden DDR4-3000 15-15-15-35
    Gigabyte Aorus 1080 Ti @ 2076/1500(6000)
    512GB Samsung PM961 + 840 Pro 256GB + some TBs
    Corsair AX1200i
    X-Star DP2710LED @ 110Hz + 40" Samsung TV

    CPU and GPU under water: 9x120 rad + 3x120 + 3x120

    ...and an HTC Vive!

  24. #99
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    433

    Click on the pic to get the highres version!

    What do you think?

  25. #100
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    529
    Dfi 875p-t with intel 640 on air
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Capture 14.jpg 
Views:	647 
Size:	198.6 KB 
ID:	27591  
    Rampage III Gene I7 950@4.48G--1.485V HR-02 12G G.Skill 1600-1.5V, GTX470-SLI@725core 1750mem, Antec P180 MINI

Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •