ouch 50C case temps!
hope you get better soon.. but hope i get further ahead before you catch up lol
ouch 50C case temps!
hope you get better soon.. but hope i get further ahead before you catch up lol
---
When I feel more up to it I will tweak OS, get fans on memory, and open the door to get ambient down
Might try my UTT aswell.
eva2000:how much better if any are the ultras compared to the gt's in terms of ocing
i got 4 cards in here, the wife says i can only keep 2so which way the ultras or the gt's...
Damnit, wanted 11000 before tonight. Going to need to raise the volts on the 6800's to 1.4v tomorrow, will defintley do better then.
See latest post.
Edit: lol, did one last run, 11103
See latest post.
Last edited by abstrakt; 02-03-2005 at 07:52 PM.
Does anyone know if Nibitor works on the PCI-E 6800 Ultras yet? Last time I checked, Nibitor 1.9 still didn't work yet.
9900k @ 5.1Ghz
Asus Maximus Hero XI
32GB (8 x 4) Gskill @4000
Strix 2080 Ti OC
OS & Apps: Samsung 970 Pro 512GB
Games: Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
Storage: Crucial M500 2TB
Seasonic Platinum 1000W
Phanteks Evolv X
1.9b works fine.Originally Posted by mdzcpa
Are you sure?
Check out this recent thread at mvktech:
http://www.mvktech.net/component/opt...limitstart,10/
It seems that although the BIOS is editable, it isn't producing the right results (the card is not running at 1.5v even though it is set in the bios).
I experienced the same trouble as HeavyH20 did on that thread...the BIOS was editable, but voltage did not change. Do you know more about this situation?
9900k @ 5.1Ghz
Asus Maximus Hero XI
32GB (8 x 4) Gskill @4000
Strix 2080 Ti OC
OS & Apps: Samsung 970 Pro 512GB
Games: Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
Storage: Crucial M500 2TB
Seasonic Platinum 1000W
Phanteks Evolv X
Ultras mate, they're 40-55mhz off the core faster than GTs out of the box stock...eva2000:how much better if any are the ultras compared to the gt's in terms of ocing
i got 4 cards in here, the wife says i can only keep 2
---
Ok I SWEAR this is the last one for tonight/this morning. 11151, just wanted to get past Pedro
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=550364
For tomorrow, tweaked win2k and 20C case ambient I thinkI think the memory will go quite far at low temps as it gets through half a 3DM05 bench at 1400MHz
Last edited by abstrakt; 02-03-2005 at 07:55 PM.
3DMark03 - 22231 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3662416
Is the list no longer being updated?
I noticed the same thing. Looks like it hasn't been updated with the last few days of posts......
D
They are working in a new release. Once 1.9c arrives, it will work.
MSI K8N Diamond
2 x 6800 Ultra PCI-E
Innovatek NV40
AMD 64 3200+
All scores updated!Is the list no longer being updated?
Was out last night (Thursday). So, I missed an evening update. But, the list has been fully updated as of now, before the all important weekend browsing!
The last update was Thursday 4:15 AM. I usually try to visit the list 2 to 3 times per day.
And, BTW, nice numbers for a couple of GT's! And, stock cooling, no less. Get an 03 run in too, when you get a chance.
Last edited by dwwalker14335; 02-04-2005 at 07:51 PM.
MSI K8N Diamond
2 x 6800 Ultra PCI-E
Innovatek NV40
AMD 64 3200+
Amazing, the MSI Diamond SLI runs 3Dmark05 with the bus set @ 350 MHZ (HTTx3)
And that with only 1.6v on Vcore, the maximum vcore with current bios b113, I cant imagine what this MB can do with more voltage.
Unfortunately my FX55 needs voltage to escalate
Here is a pic and update scores :
MSI Diamond SLI
FX55 @ 3100
2 XFX 6800GT 427/1140 Stock Cooler
3D Mark 2005 - 11147 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=546753
3D Mark 2003 - 23666 - http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3661066
Last edited by Pedro Rocha; 02-04-2005 at 02:07 PM.
The voltage item may be what converts everyone to the DFI board. If it were not for the voltage limitations, this board may very well have been the best nForce 4 board available. I guess we will have to find a volt mod.
BTW, nice run. abstrakt has got you by a nose hair, however
MSI K8N Diamond
2 x 6800 Ultra PCI-E
Innovatek NV40
AMD 64 3200+
ultras it is then, there are some very nice scores here...
Just for information purposes, here are my scores running the tests with my 3200 and the Ultra cards at stock clocks.
3DMark05
9,202
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=553952
3DMark03
21,233
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3669368
And with FX-53 stock clocks
3DMark05
10,052
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=553988
3DMark03
22,118
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3669186
Last edited by dwwalker14335; 02-04-2005 at 11:47 PM.
MSI K8N Diamond
2 x 6800 Ultra PCI-E
Innovatek NV40
AMD 64 3200+
you sure about that FX-53 3d2k3 same 22,118 score as 3200+ ?
---
Work in progress. You got me while I was updating the links. Those were both FX-53 clock runs in the post you saw.
The point of the post was to show that the CPU clocks seem to make more of a difference in 05 than 03, which would be contrary to what I would have thought, since 05 is supposedly a pure video test.
Last edited by dwwalker14335; 02-05-2005 at 12:02 AM.
MSI K8N Diamond
2 x 6800 Ultra PCI-E
Innovatek NV40
AMD 64 3200+
yeah that's what i found cpu seems to make a difference in 05 in SLI mode
---
Which tells me that the SLI mode is a driver load on the CPU. So, as the driver evolves, they may make substantial gains in performance.
MSI K8N Diamond
2 x 6800 Ultra PCI-E
Innovatek NV40
AMD 64 3200+
my cards are 6800gt ...
again some 03
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3662511
24k+!!!
cpu is fx53
ram adata DDR600
very nice //mAr
i noticed you used 71.80 drivers, they work for you ? i tried them and alot of artifacting and missing textures when 3dmarking = higher fps, but had to go back to 71.24
---
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks