New RAM List!!! (now with 1GB stick listing too)

[Toro 45]

PC3500 Level I (2-3-3) --chip--> Winbond CH-5

Is this correct? CH-5 on all Level one Mushkin PC3500


I have a gig of these but never new what chips they were due to the heat spredders, they would barely do 215mhz2-3-3-10 on my NF7 2.9V and no higher at any timmings. Now on my DFI board I did notice when I gave them 3.1V they went to 234fsb 2.5-3-3 but never pushed the voltage beyond that. If they are CH-5 how much voltage can they take and what speed is possible?

[Punisher!]

So Punisher!, what do you think
Not convince ? you need photos ?

There is no need to distinguish the revision. CH5 are gone and BH5 too.

Now just New BH5 and New CH5 (UTT) with new dies (first B and second C) are being produced. So when we speak of UTT and New BH5 all people know what we are talking about.



If you had photos of your JEDEC PCB it would be better.

[KoNiaK]

Punisher!> Saw some photos, but don't have any. Did you see that:

Just to confirm..... I have both the TMSP and TMII UTT (Both AA4T) gigs and neither have the BP PCB..... got them at Newegg.com in the states.

About the chip you're right, I guess people can make the difference, but it's very confusing :/

HousERaT> What is 'TMII' ?

[Punisher!]

Punisher!> Saw some photos, but don't have any. Did you see that:

Nope.

[REDKEN]

subscription
I want to know this too. Upgrading as soon as they come out:

where can I buy G.SKILL PC4800(DDR600 1T) (2.5-4-4-8 1T), PC3200 (2-2-2-5) (F1-3200DSU2-512FF/1GBFF)?

[DltdApS]

some XMS-PC3200LL Rev1.1/2.1 (2-2-2-6-1T) --chip--> Winbond BH-5

is rated 2-3-2-6-1T but it's winbond bh-5

[God_Lx]

PC3500 Level I (2-3-3) --chip--> Winbond CH-5

Is this correct? CH-5 on all Level one Mushkin PC3500


I have a gig of these but never new what chips they were due to the heat spredders, they would barely do 215mhz2-3-3-10 on my NF7 2.9V and no higher at any timmings. Now on my DFI board I did notice when I gave them 3.1V they went to 234fsb 2.5-3-3 but never pushed the voltage beyond that. If they are CH-5 how much voltage can they take and what speed is possible?

If they-re CH-5 they i'll do better... (Or maybe not all CH-5 is that great) i have some CH-5 and it does 215Mhz 2-2-2-5 @ 2.7vdimm (Didn't try higher even) (They do 2-2-2-5 @ 200Mhz with default vdimm but i get some memtest errors...)

[Toro 45]

Damn!! diamonds in the rough, last night I pulled out my new Twinmos chips and threw in the "old" Mushkin, set them to 200 3.1V. 2-2-2-8 and they passed memtest for the first time ever at those timimgs. 205,210,215, 220, 225, 230, 235passed and then failed at 240. Upped the voltage to 3.2V and 240fsb passed. I tried 3.3V with no improvement.

The major difference here is my PSU I was using a 400W Coolmax and bought a new Fortron530W on Monday, this was the first time I could get them over 215 at any timings. To think I was actually thinking about getting rid of them a while back, now there performing better than my Twinmos. Sure glad I stumbled across this thread, I'm tempted to try 3.4V, does CH-5 like the higher voltage?

[God_Lx]

Nice to have helped :P I myself am hoping that mine will do at least the same (I'm waiting for my cpu to try it out :P )

[Lestat]

G.Skill FF DDR600 isnt available yet that i have seen anywhere.


and also i have a few things to say about the OCZ PC3200 EL Plat Rev 2

you claim almost always 300+mhz.. your dreaming, your living a lie.
if you have 300+ mhz OCZ Plat rev 2 then your lucky
personally i think the ram is total crap ive had 2 kits of it and neither one would go over 290 2.5-4-4- or 2.5-3-3- 1T or 2T

2 different AMD64 systems and 2 different Intel systems.

in order to hit and go over 300mhz i had to use a 5:6 divider which is worthless..It proves nothing. and i think i had to use a 2T setting but i cant recall.
hell my OCZ EL Gold PC4000 Rev 2 did 320mhz @ 2.5-4-4-8 1T with a 9:10 divider. which is only 180mhz where as 5:6 is 166mhz

the Plat rev 2 wont do squat with a 9/10 divider.

i think you need to remove that plat rev 2 off the 300+ list and put it into a 275+ catagory. cuz after 275mhz even in single channel single stick it pukes out. although i got to 290 2.5-4-4-8 2T yes 2T well isnt that just special,, its meaningless to go 2T unless your just trying to puch your cpu ghz higher.

[Punisher!]

G.Skill FF DDR600 isnt available yet that i have seen anywhere.


and also i have a few things to say about the OCZ PC3200 EL Plat Rev 2

you claim almost always 300+mhz.. your dreaming, your living a lie.
if you have 300+ mhz OCZ Plat rev 2 then your lucky
personally i think the ram is total crap ive had 2 kits of it and neither one would go over 290 2.5-4-4- or 2.5-3-3- 1T or 2T

2 different AMD64 systems and 2 different Intel systems.

in order to hit and go over 300mhz i had to use a 5:6 divider which is worthless..It proves nothing. and i think i had to use a 2T setting but i cant recall.
hell my OCZ EL Gold PC4000 Rev 2 did 320mhz @ 2.5-4-4-8 1T with a 9:10 divider. which is only 180mhz where as 5:6 is 166mhz

the Plat rev 2 wont do squat with a 9/10 divider.

i think you need to remove that plat rev 2 off the 300+ list and put it into a 275+ catagory. cuz after 275mhz even in single channel single stick it pukes out. although i got to 290 2.5-4-4-8 2T yes 2T well isnt that just special,, its meaningless to go 2T unless your just trying to puch your cpu ghz higher.

Just unlucky.

http://www.anandtech.com/memory/show...px?i=2226&p=20

[Snowman89]

http://www.datorbutiken.com/se/defau...Id=256DDRAD450
what is that for ram?
isnt on adatas homepage either

[dimasdw]

OCZ Technology
EL DDR PC-3200(DDR400)
Dual Channel Gold
512MB×2
2-2-2-5 Timings at 2.8V

What this RAM chip bh-5 or UTT ? it has same Price with the VX series in japan

[Ashe]

It should be bh5, never heard of any UTT doing 2-2-2 @2.8V

[dimasdw]

It should be bh5, never heard of any UTT doing 2-2-2 @2.8V

the shop said this chip is BH5 to..acording to this picture
anyone has test this ram ?

[Wired-HoH]

Hey guys, thought I'd post some tweaks / corrections to the Corsair list. I'm one of the admins of the House of Help, which hosts the Official Corsair Support Forum, and we get asked which ICs are in which revision a lot. Unfortunately, the revision itself isn't enough to definitively state what IC is used, the lot # is needed as well.

CLOSED THREAD - Corsair Ram & Memory Chips Used - replaced by the next thread
IC Inquiry Thread
How To Read the Memory Label


If you would like to know which IC your memory has, just follow the instructions in the IC Inquiry Thread and post within it.

Anyway, I've been keeping a list of what ICs are used with what part #, version #, and lot # and updating it whenever an official answer is given out on that specific combo. Here are some of the tweaks/corrections/confirmations, along with how many sticks I've seen of that part # / revision # combo:


XMS-PC3200C2 Rev1.0 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Winbond CH-5 v1.0 Winbond -5 Rev C (1 stick)
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev1.1/2.1 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Winbond BH-6 v1.1 Winbond -6 Rev B (4 sticks)
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev1.2/2.2 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Winbond CH-6 v1.2 Winbond -5 Rev C (1 stick) v2.2 Winbond -6 Rev C (1 stick)
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev3.1 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Infineon Rev B -5 v3.1 Infineon -5 (2 sticks)
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev4.1 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Samsung TCCD v4.x Infineon Rev B -5 or Samsung -5 TCCX (TCC4 or TCC5 or TCCD) (9 sticks)
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev4.2 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Samsung TCCD & TCC5
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev5.1/6.1 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Mosel Vitelic 5ns v5.x Promos -5 Rev A or Mosel -5 Rev A (8 sticks)

Additions:
XMS-PC4000 Rev3.1 (3-4-4-8) --chip--> Samsung -5 TCCC (2 sticks)

As for all of the Brainpower markings on the Corsair list here:

we design our own PCB's, we do however use brain power to make some of our PCB's but these modules will use our PCB.

[Punisher!]

Hey guys, thought I'd post some tweaks / corrections to the Corsair list. I'm one of the admins of the House of Help, which hosts the Official Corsair Support Forum, and we get asked which ICs are in which revision a lot. Unfortunately, the revision itself isn't enough to definitively state what IC is used, the lot # is needed as well.

CLOSED THREAD - Corsair Ram & Memory Chips Used - replaced by the next thread
IC Inquiry Thread
How To Read the Memory Label


If you would like to know which IC your memory has, just follow the instructions in the IC Inquiry Thread and post within it.

Anyway, I've been keeping a list of what ICs are used with what part #, version #, and lot # and updating it whenever an official answer is given out on that specific combo. Here are some of the tweaks/corrections/confirmations, along with how many sticks I've seen of that part # / revision # combo:


XMS-PC3200C2 Rev1.0 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Winbond CH-5 v1.0 Winbond -5 Rev C (1 stick)
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev1.1/2.1 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Winbond BH-6 v1.1 Winbond -6 Rev B (4 sticks)
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev1.2/2.2 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Winbond CH-6 v1.2 Winbond -5 Rev C (1 stick) v2.2 Winbond -6 Rev C (1 stick)
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev3.1 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Infineon B-5 v3.1 Infineon -5 (2 sticks)
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev4.1 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Samsung TCCD v4.x Samsung -5 TCCX (TCC4 or TCC5 or TCCD) (9 sticks)
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev4.2 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Samsung TCCD & TCC5
XMS-PC3200C2 Rev5.1/6.1 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Mosel Vitelic 5ns v5.x Promos -5 Rev A or Mosel -5 Rev A (8 sticks)

Additions:
XMS-PC4000 Rev3.1 (3-4-4-8) --chip--> Samsung -5 TCCC (2 sticks)

As for all of the Brainpower markings on the Corsair list here:

XMS-PC3200C2 Rev4.1 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Samsung TCCD v4.x Samsung -5 TCCX (TCC4 or TCC5 or TCCD) (9 sticks)

MMh... Samsung TCC4 doesn't hold CAS 2 @ 200 Mhz, tried by myself.

Anyway, thanks for the good job. I will add the addition.

[Punisher!]

Additions:
Added XMS PC4000 Rev. 3.1 and new OCZ PC3200 Gold with New BH5.

[Wired-HoH]

XMS-PC3200C2 Rev4.1 (2-3-3-6-1T) --chip--> Samsung TCCD v4.x Samsung -5 TCCX (TCC4 or TCC5 or TCCD) (9 sticks)

MMh... Samsung TCC4 doesn't hold CAS 2 @ 200 Mhz, tried by myself.

Anyway, thanks for the good job. I will add the addition.

No problemo. However, all of those IC listings I posted were quoted from various posts from Ram Guy, Corsair's official Rep @ HoH. Search HoH for Key Word(s): tcc4 ; Posts Made By: RAM GUY. I'll email him to get a confirmation on it.

When you tested TCC4s, who made the stick, and what were the system specs?

[Punisher!]

No problemo. However, all of those IC listings I posted were quoted from various posts from Ram Guy, Corsair's official Rep @ HoH. Search HoH for Key Word(s): tcc4 ; Posts Made By: RAM GUY. I'll email him to get a confirmation on it.

When you tested TCC4s, who made the stick, and what were the system specs?

They were Samsung retail PC3200 sticks (rated @ 3-3-3-8). CAS 2 didn't work at all, neither @ 166 Mhz (on A7N8X, the same that is in signature, working perfectly @ 2-2-2-3 with GeIL Ultra-X).
The same for TCCC chips... CAS 2 didn't exist.

[Wired-HoH]

That doesn't prove anything overall specifically about the IC in general, because if they may have been tested @ CAS 3 but not CAS 2. They could just be using the lower yielding ICs for that particular model, ones that test fine @ 3-3-3-8, but not at any better timings.

Anyway, still waiting for a response from Ram Guy, I'll probably get one Monday or Tuesday when he gets back into the office.

[KoNiaK]

Nope.

so you don't wannt to change, can't understand why

[RocKer]

XMS-PC3500C2 Rev1.1 (2-3-3-7-1T) --chip--> Winbond BH-5

If a may ask,why is this ram thats on the first page,is with this timing(2-3-3-7-1T).

I have those sticks and the do easy 2-2-2-5 1T from fsb200 to 250 with my a64 3200+(s754),in my sig the are also @ 2-2-2-5,so why 2-3-3-7 1T.

[Wired-HoH]

XMS-PC3500C2 Rev1.1 (2-3-3-7-1T) --chip--> Winbond BH-5

If a may ask,why is this ram thats on the first page,is with this timing(2-3-3-7-1T).

I have those sticks and the do easy 2-2-2-5 1T from fsb200 to 250 with my a64 3200+(s754),in my sig the are also @ 2-2-2-5,so why 2-3-3-7 1T.

Because 2-3-3-7 are the official timings. There are 3500C2s that cannot do 2-2-2-5.

[Punisher!]

That doesn't prove anything overall specifically about the IC in general, because if they may have been tested @ CAS 3 but not CAS 2. They could just be using the lower yielding ICs for that particular model, ones that test fine @ 3-3-3-8, but not at any better timings.

Anyway, still waiting for a response from Ram Guy, I'll probably get one Monday or Tuesday when he gets back into the office.

I am here .