Page 5 of 128 FirstFirst ... 23456781555105 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 3191

Thread: Xtreme Twinmos Memory!

  1. #101
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    227
    Quote Originally Posted by tictac
    yeah TwinMOS memory need proper burn in for quite sometimes to perform well

    they are not properly burnin in factory
    Laugh all you want but they only did 230MHz when I got them. Some RAM has been proven to gain from burning in so it is not just a myth.

    the_n00b<:o): too early stick.

  2. #102
    IT Engineer in the making
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Former Kingdom of Bavaria
    Posts
    2,094
    Quote Originally Posted by tom_ed
    Hi,

    Just read this thread and i have unearthed my old twinmos 256mb chips. Stepping is:

    03254
    TMD7608F8E50D

    Ill test them a little later, but they do have the two dimples on each chip. does that mean they are winbond?
    Your Twinmos RAM has Mitsubishi Chips on it. Test it, but it'll never perform like Winbond. I bet it doesn't have the two dimples in the middle, but one half dimple in the middle of the lower edge of the chip.
    Quote from one of our professors:
    "Reality is hiding in the imaginary part."

  3. #103
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Coventry, UK
    Posts
    24
    well heres a pic:



    i think it has 2 large dimples on the chips. testing now...

  4. #104
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    Quote Originally Posted by the_n00b<:o)
    gonna check later.. but heres the cpu-z spd table..
    maybe I will buy a booster, but I dont know if it works on my is7-e

    it works but the VVT track gets all out of whack so the more volts dont really help much...

    tom: that looks like winbond to me buddy, start cooking them and let us know how it goes.

  5. #105
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Hi there guys and HAPPY NEW YEAR......


    Now........Testing those two modules I was quit amazed I could say......

    They ACT like BH-5 modules BUT COLDER.......on an INTEL rig.......

    With 3.2Vdimm(provided by the DDR Maximizer - clean power - .....they reached over 240MHz at Cas 2 - 5 - 2 - 2.........NONE CH-5 chips works at those settings on an INTEL rig so I believe that they are NOT equiv. to CH-5 chips........

    Twinmos 2 x 512MB UTT on an ABIT AS8 Mobo with the 865 chipset.......at 3.55Vdimm....

    PAT = Disabled

    Timings :

    2 - 5 - 2 - 2
    32M
    Auto
    Normal
    4
    Enable
    Disable



    The funny here is that the cpu-z shows "crazy" product date......






    .......and these are 2 x 512MB BH-5 chips for comparison.......at the same config.......




    ALL I have to say is : Twinmos with the UTT chips = BH-5 chips........
    Last edited by hipro5; 01-02-2005 at 08:56 AM.
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  6. #106
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SLOVENIJA
    Posts
    2,594
    so you guys saying

    160$ for a GIG of good overclocking RAM ?
    ASUS P5K-E // E8400 Q746A519
    G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ
    LC 550W GP// XPERTVISION 9600GT

  7. #107
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Quote Originally Posted by TEDY
    so you guys saying

    160$ for a GIG of good overclocking RAM ?
    As I know esdee bought them about 140Euros........

    I think I'll get 2 x 256MB ones to see how they will do.......Hmmmm.......
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  8. #108
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    damn hipro...

    now i want that maximizer ever more lol.


    i need to buy another set of ram for an old computer im selling so ill give these a shot and if they are good then ill keep em and if they are bad then away they go.

  9. #109
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Reno, Nevada
    Posts
    133

  10. #110
    IT Engineer in the making
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Former Kingdom of Bavaria
    Posts
    2,094
    Quote Originally Posted by tom_ed
    well heres a pic:



    i think it has 2 large dimples on the chips. testing now...

    Hmm, interesting. Then Twinmos changed something, as some time ago all Winbond based Twinmos RAMs began with 04xxxx and so on. Yours is 03xxx and is definitely Winbond based.

    Good luck with the sticks.

    Edit: Well, got it wrong. Now I realized that it's the 4 at the end and not in the beginning. So yours are chips from week 25 in 2003 and the 4 means that it's winbond based. That's it.

    So yours should basically be CH-5 chips.
    Last edited by celemine1Gig; 01-07-2005 at 09:14 AM.
    Quote from one of our professors:
    "Reality is hiding in the imaginary part."

  11. #111
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    247
    So would that make this http://www.tekheads.co.uk/s/product?product=601808 the stuff to get ?

    Im going to grab a 2x256 on tues if so.

  12. #112
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SLOVENIJA
    Posts
    2,594
    damn cheap :>
    ASUS P5K-E // E8400 Q746A519
    G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ
    LC 550W GP// XPERTVISION 9600GT

  13. #113
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Coventry, UK
    Posts
    24
    well both been tested on my DFI 250gb @ 3.1v. I would have gone higher but im on a crappy 300w psu that has a 3.3v rail @ 3.15v

    one stick did 240mhz 2-2-2-5 and the other did 247mhz 2-2-2-5. i feel with more volts they could go higher they scaled well up to there.

    Jessfm that is the exact kit that this is, but i dont think they come with winbond chips anymore.
    Last edited by tom_ed; 01-02-2005 at 10:27 AM.

  14. #114
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SLOVENIJA
    Posts
    2,594
    who could buy this for me in europe and send me ? i could wire the money

    got no cc
    ASUS P5K-E // E8400 Q746A519
    G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ
    LC 550W GP// XPERTVISION 9600GT

  15. #115
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    247
    I think its worth a look then.

    But Hipro5 is reffering to a newer chip thats on these ??

    So the chips between BH5 and the new UTT are poor clockers( CH5 or Mitsubishi chips?)

    or am I totaly confused now ( to be fair I have had a couple of beers today)

  16. #116
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    so we should hunt for Twinmos with mtec/Twinmos chip

    week 82 2004 or newer

    Thanks Hipro5

  17. #117
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    227
    Week 82 sounds tough...

  18. #118
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    yes it is

  19. #119
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    so which do i buy?

  20. #120
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Baltics
    Posts
    1,120
    w00t, I just bought a kit of OCZ VX (still on the way), now I have to buy these as well?
    away & gone

  21. #121
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Athens,Hellas
    Posts
    810
    Quote Originally Posted by tictac
    so we should hunt for Twinmos with mtec/Twinmos chip

    week 82 2004 or newer

    Thanks Hipro5
    tictac you need to reboot your brain!!!!
    if this is your first night in xtremesystems,
    you have to overclock.

  22. #122
    XS Intel News & DČOL enhanced
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,205
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5
    Hi there guys and HAPPY NEW YEAR......


    Now........Testing those two modules I was quit amazed I could say......

    They ACT like BH-5 modules BUT COLDER.......on an INTEL rig.......

    With 3.2Vdimm(provided by the DDR Maximizer - clean power - .....they reached over 240MHz at Cas 2 - 5 - 2 - 2.........NONE CH-5 chips works at those settings on an INTEL rig so I believe that they are NOT equiv. to CH-5 chips........

    Twinmos 2 x 512MB UTT on an ABIT AS8 Mobo with the 865 chipset.......at 3.55Vdimm....



    PAT = Disabled

    Timings :

    2 - 5 - 2 - 2
    32M
    Auto
    Normal
    4
    Enable
    Disable



    The funny here is that the cpu-z shows "crazy" product date......






    .......and these are 2 x 512MB BH-5 chips for comparison.......at the same config.......




    ALL I have to say is : Twinmos with the UTT chips = BH-5 chips........

    My CH-5 does the same on abit IC7-G 3.55V

    i'll post shots tommorow

  23. #123
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    yeah ive seen newer ch-5 doing that before...

    but still, what do i buy!?

    lol

  24. #124
    Xtreme Recruit
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    93
    yeah i'm a little confused here as well are we supposed to get the speed premium with the twinmos chips or the cheap ones with the mtec chips?

  25. #125
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    247
    Quote Originally Posted by LSANTHRAX
    yeah i'm a little confused here as well are we supposed to get the speed premium with the twinmos chips or the cheap ones with the mtec chips?
    me 2

Page 5 of 128 FirstFirst ... 23456781555105 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •