Intel hasn't lost money in decades and had US$6.5 Billion in net earnings in the last 12 months.Originally posted by saaya
and about economies of scale and manufacturing techniques, your right, intel is loosing even more money as they spent billions and billions on the development of those cpus and they still came up with a worse performing more expensive to manufacture cpu than amd came up with a much much smaller budget
because its dominating the market and everybody buys celeronsOriginally posted by accord99
Intel hasn't lost money in decades and had US$6.5 Billion in net earnings in the last 12 months.
and both cpus used single channel, they probably didnt have a second stick
Yes, but this has more to do with the lack of public awareness among the computer buying masses. It has nothing to do with the quality of Intel's or AMD's product, and certainly nothing to do with this thread.Originally posted by accord99
Intel hasn't lost money in decades and had US$6.5 Billion in net earnings in the last 12 months.
Please start an "Intel has lots of money so they are always right" thread if you like.
Yes, but I didn't start it. Saaya did with the suggestion that Intel is losing billions of dollars.Originally posted by StormPC
Yes, but this has more to do with the lack of public awareness among the computer buying masses. It has nothing to do with the quality of Intel's or AMD's product, and certainly nothing to do with this thread.
Please start an "Intel has lots of money so they are always right" thread if you like.
He didn't say lost, he said spent on engineering.
This has to do with Intel offering the products that people want for the price that they are willing to pay for it. It has nothing to do with ignorance by the "masses". If that topic had nothing to do with this thread, it would have made no sense to reply to it.Originally posted by StormPC
Yes, but this has more to do with the lack of public awareness among the computer buying masses. It has nothing to do with the quality of Intel's or AMD's product, and certainly nothing to do with this thread.
Please start an "Intel has lots of money so they are always right" thread if you like.
Hehehe so you could start another about AMD has lost lots of money so they must be always wrong", right?Originally posted by StormPC
Yes, but this has more to do with the lack of public awareness among the computer buying masses. It has nothing to do with the quality of Intel's or AMD's product, and certainly nothing to do with this thread.
Please start an "Intel has lots of money so they are always right" thread if you like.
The difference is, AMD is a parts supplier while Intel supplies Whole systems. CPU's are important to them but not everything to Intel, like it is for AMD. If it weren't for Flash Memory sales, AMD would have been in the red or barely broke even LOL!
Donnie27
Last edited by Donnie27; 07-10-2004 at 05:15 PM.
Oh those poor ignorant fools. Don't all the computer users of the world realize they are missing out on %5 better gaming performance by using intels? What intel's doing is worse than worldcom, enron, and michaeal jackson combined. Poor poor foolish bastardsOriginally posted by Speed_Mechanic
This has to do with Intel offering the products that people want for the price that they are willing to pay for it. It has nothing to do with ignorance by the "masses". If that topic had nothing to do with this thread, it would have made no sense to reply to it.
2.6C@3.25 | P4P800-D
X800 PRO 525/560
2x256 Kingston Value CL3
11,360 03Marks
What do you mean? Intel doesn't sell computers, they sell CPUs and motherbaord chipsets. So does AMD.Originally posted by Donnie27
The difference is, AMD is a parts supplier while Intel supplies Whole systems.
Opteron 165 CCBWE 0550UPMW@2.5 GHz 1.3 V 1GB / A64 3500+ 512M / A64 3500+ 512M / AXP 2500+@400FSB 1GB / AXP 2500+@400FSB 512M / AXP 1700+@333FSB 256M / AXP 1700+@300FSB 256M / Athlon 1150 384M / Ferrari 3000 AXP 2500+ laptop
Intel is a systems dealer, they sell 80% of the parts for a computer, AMD sells what, 10%?
Intel Spends more on R&D in one Quarter than AMD will spend in 5 years LOL! Waste? Tell that to the *large part of the market Intel pulls along with it? They'd be up a creek if they depended on AMD to do the same.
Only the Germans and the EU pulled AMD's butt out of the fire this time. Meanwhile Intel loans old enemy Micron $400 million, $200 million to Samsung and another to NEC/Hynix. If it came down to it, which company do you think these companies would vote for?
People aren't crazy for buying Intel products and many gave AMD a shot but though old problematic MVP, AMD 750, VIA KT's of all kinds and even nForce1 and early 2s stunk! It's not like the later, better stable nForce motherboards have been around for years LOL!
Donnie27
Hahahaha!Originally posted by IronYuppie
Oh those poor ignorant fools. Don't all the computer users of the world realize they are missing out on %5 better gaming performance by using intels? What intel's doing is worse than worldcom, enron, and michaeal jackson combined. Poor poor foolish bastards
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks